Optimization of Enhanced Oil Recovery using Hybrid CO2-Nanoparticle Foam Flooding in Depleted Reservoirs
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objectives of Study
- 1.5Limitation of the Study
- 1.6Scope of the Study
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Theoretical Foundations of Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)
- 2.2Overview of Foam Flooding Technologies
- 2.3Hybrid CO2-Nanoparticle Foam: Mechanisms and Interactions
- 2.4Reservoir Characterization and Heterogeneity
- 2.5CO2 Availability, Transport, and Storage Considerations
- 2.6Nanoparticle Properties and Stabilization in Aqueous Phases
- 2.7Surfactants, Foaming Agents, and Foam Quality Metrics
- 2.8EOR Performance in Depleted Reservoirs: Historical Case Studies
- 2.9Foam-Fluid-Rock Interactions: Wettability and Relative Permeability
- 2.10Environmental, Safety, and Economic Aspects of CO2-Nanoparticle Foams
Chapter THREE
SYSTEM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
- 3.1Research Design and Philosophy
- 3.2Model Selection: Pore-Scale vs. Core-Scale Approaches
- 3.3Materials: CO2, Nanoparticles, Surfactants, Formation Fluids
- 3.4Experimental Setup and Core Preparation
- 3.5Foam Generation and Stabilization Protocols
- 3.6Core Flooding Experiments: Procedure and Parameters
- 3.7Data Acquisition: Pressure, Saturation, and Production Profiling
- 3.8Numerical Modeling Framework: Pore-Scale and Reservoir-Scale Models
- 3.9Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis
- 3.10Validation and Calibration Strategies
Chapter FOUR
SYSTEM TESTING AND EVALUATION
- 4.1Reservoir Simulation Scenarios for Depleted Reservoirs
- 4.2Optimization of Injection Strategies (CO2-Nanoparticle Foam)
- 4.3Foam Stability and Propagation in Heterogeneous Media
- 4.4Capillary Pressure Modification due to Foam Flooding
- 4.5Nanoparticle Transport and Retention Modeling
- 4.6Economic Evaluation: Cost-Benefit and Break-Even Analysis
- 4.7Environmental Impact Assessment of Hybrid Foam Floods
- 4.8Comparative Analysis with Conventional EOR Methods
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Theoretical and Practical Implications
- 5.3Limitations and Recommendations for Future Work
- 5.4Conclusions and Final Thoughts
Project Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of a hybrid CO2-nanoparticle foam flooding approach to enhance oil recovery in depleted reservoirs, integrating experimental, numerical, and techno-economic analyses to establish a viable field-scale implementation framework. The core objective is to quantify the incremental oil recovery, optimize foam stability and mobility control, and understand the interactions among CO2, surfactants, and nanoparticles under reservoir conditions, including high salinity, high pressure, and elevated temperature environments. Laboratory experiments were conducted to synthesize and characterize stable foam formulations using a range of nanoparticles (silica, alumina, and silica-coated magnetic particles) and surfactants compatible with CO2-rich brines. Coreflood experiments in carbonate and sandstone plugs simulating depleted reservoirs assessed displacing efficiency, trapping mechanisms, relative permeability alteration, and resistance factors at representative reservoir temperatures (60–120°C) and pressures (20–40 MPa). The results demonstrated that hybrid foam systems significantly reduced gas mobility, lowered CO2 channeling, and enhanced oil displacement efficiency by promoting favorable interfacial rheology, wettability alteration, and segregated transport pathways that impede gas breakthrough. A dynamic reservoir model incorporating capillary desaturation, foam generation kinetics, gas-liquid partitioning, and nanoparticle transport was developed and validated against experimental data, enabling sensitivity analyses of foam quality, gas slippage, salinity, nanoparticle concentration, and injection rate. The modeling framework was employed to simulate field-scale scenarios, revealing substantial oil recovery gains with manageable adverse effects on injection pressure and foam stability when optimized parameters—foam quality between 0.2 and 0.6, nanoparticle concentration in the range of 0.01–0.1 wt%, and CO2 slug sizes aligning with reservoir heterogeneity—were implemented. Economic viability was evaluated through a discounted cash flow analysis, accounting for CO2 sourcing, nanoparticle synthesis, surfactant consumption, surface facility adjustments, and potential CO2 sequestration credits. Sensitivity analyses highlighted that the most significant economic drivers are CO2 availability, foam longevity, and incremental oil production rate, while the principal technical challenges include nanoparticle retention near the wellbore, long-term stability under complex brine chemistries, and scale-up from corefloods to heterogeneous reservoirs. The study proposes a delineated workflow for field deployment, including a screening framework to identify suitable reservoirs, a pilot design with monitoring plans for foam in-situ behavior, and risk mitigation strategies addressing phase separation, emulsification risk, and environmental considerations. The findings indicate that the hybrid CO2-nanoparticle foam system can markedly improve sweep efficiency and ultimate oil recovery in depleted reservoirs, while maintaining acceptable operational risks when designed with robust particle selection, compatible surfactants, and temperature- and salinity-tolerant formulations. This work contributes a quantitative, integrated methodology for assessing foam-assisted CO2 EOR schemes, offering a pathway toward scalable implementation and informed decision-making in mature oil fields facing declining production.
Project Overview
What This Project Is About
This project looks at ways to recover more oil from old wells by combining two approaches: using CO2 gas to push oil and tiny particles that help foam to block high-flow paths in the rock. The goal is to use a hybrid foam system that travels through depleted reservoirs more effectively and reduces the amount of oil left behind.
The Problem It Addresses
Objectives of the Project
- Review how current enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods work and where they fail in depleted reservoirs.
- Explain what CO2-nanoparticle foam is and how it could improve oil displacement.
- Model the flow of the hybrid foam in simple rock-like systems.
- Assess potential benefits, costs, and environmental considerations of the method.
- Suggest practical guidelines for laboratory testing and pilot studies.
What You Will Do Step by Step
- Study background literature on CO2 flooding and nanoparticle-stabilized foams.
- Define a simple experimental setup to test foam stability and oil recovery in core samples.
- Run small tests varying foam composition, gas flow, and rock properties.
- Collect data on oil recovered, pressure behavior, and foam stability.
- Analyze data to identify trends and optimal conditions.
- Compare results with traditional methods to evaluate improvements.
- Discuss practical challenges and safety considerations.
- Prepare a concise report of findings and recommendations.
Expected Outcome