Enhanced oil recovery via low-salinity water-alternate-gas injection in carbonate reservoirs: feasibility, optimization, and environmental impact assessment
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objectives of the Study
- 1.5Limitations of the Study
- 1.6Scope of the Study
- 1.7Significance of the Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Historical perspective of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in carbonate reservoirs
- 2.2Review of low-salinity water flooding (LSWF) mechanisms and theories
- 2.3Gas injection and gas-assisted EOR in carbonates
- 2.4Fluidβrock interactions in carbonate formations
- 2.5Wettability alteration in carbonate rocks
- 2.6Reservoir conditions and rock- fluid properties in carbonate reservoirs
- 2.7Measurement and modeling of interfacial tension and capillary pressure
- 2.8Numerical simulation approaches for LSWF-GI combinations
- 2.9Experimental design and core flooding studies in carbonate rocks
- 2.10Environmental and sustainability considerations in EOR
Chapter THREE
SYSTEM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
- 3.1Research design and approach
- 3.2Reservoir characterization and data acquisition
- 3.3Experimental methodology: core flooding setup and procedures
- 3.4Fluids properties characterization (salinity, alkalinity, brine composition, gas type)
- 3.5Wettability and capillary pressure measurement techniques
- 3.6Laboratory core flooding experiments: LSWF, gas injection, and combined schemes
- 3.7Numerical modeling framework and simulation setup
- 3.8Sensitivity analysis and optimization framework
- 3.9Validation and uncertainty quantification
- 3.10Risk assessment and environmental impact evaluation
Chapter FOUR
SYSTEM TESTING AND EVALUATION
- 4.1Geological model construction for carbonate reservoirs
- 4.2Petrophysical properties and rock- fluid parameters input
- 4.3Experimental results: base case LSWF, gas injection, and hybrid strategies
- 4.4Wettability alteration observations and interpretation
- 4.5Capillary pressure and relative permeability trends under varying salinity and gas content
- 4.6Surfactant-free vs. surfactant-assisted scenarios
- 4.7Numerical simulation results: history matching and forecast
- 4.8Economic and environmental performance assessment of EOR schemes
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of main findings
- 5.2Conclusions drawn from experimental and modeling work
- 5.3Implications for carbonate reservoir management
- 5.4Recommendations for field implementation
- 5.5Limitations and uncertainties
- 5.6Suggestions for future work
Project Abstract
In carbonate reservoirs, enhanced oil recovery (EOR) remains a critical challenge, with low-salinity water-alternate-gas (LSWAG) injection emerging as a promising technique to improve sweep efficiency and recoveries while potentially reducing environmental footprint. This study investigates the feasibility, optimization, and environmental impact of LSWAG as a hybrid EOR method, integrating low-salinity water (LSW) pretreatment with gas-assisted displacement to exploit wettability alteration, brine salinity effects, and interfacial tension modifications. A multidisciplinary approach combines core-flood experiments, petrophysical characterization, and reservoir-scale modeling to quantify incremental oil recovery, operational costs, and reservoir performance under realistic carbonate conditions, including varying mineralogy, porosity, temperature, and capillary pressures. Laboratory experiments use meticulously prepared LSW at multiple salinity ranges to evaluate wettability changes, relative permeability hysteresis, and oil/brine/gas interfacial tension under controlled conditions. Phase behavior experiments assess gas miscibility and solubility trends with salinity variations to determine optimal gas types (e.g., CO2, CH4, or hydrocarbon gases) and injection schedules. Core floods simulate sequential LSW and gas cycles, variations in cycle duration, injection rate, and brine salinity to identify synergies that maximize oil displacement while minimizing unfavorable early water breakthrough. Geochemical analyses track mineral dissolution/precipitation and potential scaling risks to anticipate formation damage and equipment corrosion. On the modeling front, a coupled reservoir simulator is calibrated with experimental data to explore sensitivity to salinity, pore-scale wettability, gas compressibility, and reservoir heterogeneity. The study examines different operational strategies, including conventional LSW, gas-assisted LSW, and alternating sequences, to define an optimal protocol that balances incremental oil recovery against water handling, gas utilization, and energy input. Economic optimization incorporates capex/opex, chemical costs, gas procurement, and carbon footprint, performing scenario analyses to determine break-even oil prices and project viability across varying field scales. Environmental assessment encompasses life cycle assessment (LCA) of LSWAG deployment, quantifying emissions, water usage, and potential disposal impacts, along with risk analyses for aquifer integrity and surface ecosystem implications. Preliminary results indicate that carefully tuned LSW cycles can enhance reservoir wettability toward intermediate-wet states, reducing residual oil saturation and improving gas-assisted sweep efficiency in carbonate rocks with high heterogeneity. The integrated framework demonstrates that LSWAG can offer superior oil recovery gains compared to standalone LSW or gas injection under certain salinity regimes, while presenting manageable environmental trade-offs when optimized for water reuse and gas utilization. The findings provide actionable guidelines for field pilots, including key salinity targets, cycle timing, and monitoring metrics, and contribute to a broader understanding of sustainable EOR practices in carbonate reservoirs.
Project Overview
What This Project Is About
A plain-language overview of the topic and what the project investigates.
The Problem It Addresses
What problem or gap this project tackles and why it matters to the field or society.
Objectives of the Project
- Understand what low-salinity water and gas injection do in carbonate rocks.
- Compare different injection strategies for oil recovery and cost.
- Evaluate environmental impacts of the chosen methods.
- Develop a simple optimization plan that balances energy recovery with safety.
- Summarize practical steps for field implementation.
What You Will Do Step by Step
- Review basic concepts of enhanced oil recovery and carbonate reservoir behavior.
- Learn what low-salinity water and gas injection mean and how they interact.
- Set up simple case studies (lab-scale or computer-simulated) to test strategies.
- Collect data from literature and any available experiments on efficiency and costs.
- Analyze which methods improve oil recovery the most in carbonate rocks.
- Assess environmental factors like water use, emissions, and waste handling.
- Propose an easy-to-follow plan for real-world testing in a field.
Expected Outcome
Students will gain a clear understanding of how low-salinity water-alternate-gas injection could improve oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs, with a simple framework for evaluating feasibility, optimizing the approach, and assessing environmental impacts. The project should produce a concise set of recommendations for further study or field trials.