Enhanced oil recovery using nanofluid-assisted thermal methods in low permeability carbonate reservoirs
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of study
- 1.5Limitation of study
- 1.6Scope of study
- 1.7Significance of study
- 1.8Structure of the research
- 1.9Definition of terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 10 sections
- 2.1Theoretical foundations of enhanced oil recovery (EOR)
- 2.2Overview of nanofluid technology in petroleum engineering
- 2.3Thermal methods in EOR: steam-assisted gravity drainage, cyclic steam stimulation, and related processes
- 2.4Nanoparticle materials and properties relevant to EOR
- 2.5Mechanisms of nanofluid-enhanced oil recovery (interfacial tension reduction, wettability alteration, rock-fluid interactions)
- 2.6Transport and stability of nanofluids in porous media
- 2.7Low-permeability carbonate reservoirs: characteristics and challenges
- 2.8Experimental methodologies for evaluating nanofluid EOR
- 2.9Numerical modeling approaches for nanofluid-assisted thermal EOR
- 2.10Environmental, safety, and economic considerations in nanofluid EOR
Chapter THREE
SYSTEM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
- 3.1Research design and philosophy
- 3.2Selection of nanofluid formulations
- 3.3Material characterization techniques (particle size, zeta potential, stability)
- 3.4Experimental setup for core flooding under thermal conditions
- 3.5Temperature control and steam generation methods
- 3.6Oilβwaterβrock system preparation and carbonate core selection
- 3.7Measurements: IFT, contact angle, relative permeability, and oil recovery
- 3.8Coreflood protocol and procedure
- 3.9Data acquisition and processing methods
- 3.10Numerical model development and calibration
- 3.11Sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification
- 3.12Validation against literature data
Chapter FOUR
SYSTEM TESTING AND EVALUATION
- 4.1Baseline oil recovery under conventional thermal methods
- 4.2Nanofluid formulation performance: stability and rheology
- 4.3IFT reduction and wettability alteration demonstrated by nanofluids
- 4.4Coreflood results: oil recovery with nanofluid-assisted thermal method
- 4.5Effect of permeability on nanofluid effectiveness in carbonate rocks
- 4.6Temperature distribution and thermal conductivity improvements
- 4.7Transport phenomena: nanoparticle retention, migration, and adsorption
- 4.8Economic and operational considerations: cost-per-barrel, energy input, and scalability
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of key findings
- 5.2Implications for reservoir engineering practice
- 5.3Limitations of the study and potential biases
- 5.4Recommendations for field deployment
- 5.5Future work and avenues for further research
- 5.6Conclusions and final reflections
Project Abstract
This study investigates the integration of nanofluid-assisted thermal methods to enhance oil recovery in low permeability carbonate reservoirs, addressing the dual challenges of limited permeability and strong capillary trapping that impede conventional recovery processes. We deploy a comprehensive experimental and numerical framework to quantify the performance of silica- and alumina-based nanofluids dispersed in thermal solvents (steam and hot water) across a representative carbonate core plug suite with permeability ranging from 0.5 to 5 mD and pore throat distributions typical of tight carbonate formations. Key mechanisms examined include nanofluid-induced alteration of rockβfluid interfacial properties, modification of wettability toward more oil-wet to intermediate wet states, reduction of oil viscosity via thermal effects, and stabilization of displacing fronts through enhanced thermal conductivity and convective transport. The study systematically evaluates nanoparticle concentration, size, zeta potential, and surface functionalization to identify stable dispersions at elevated temperatures and salinities encountered in reservoir conditions. Core flood experiments measure incremental oil recovery, changes in differential pressure, and end-point water cuts under conventional steam, nanofluid-assisted steam, and nanofluid-assisted hot water protocols. Complementary microelectrochemical measurements quantify contact angle dynamics, capillary pressure curves, and interfacial tension reductions to elucidate dominant recovery pathways, including interfacial tension attenuation, contact line pinning decreases, and relative permeability improvements. A multi-physics reservoir simulation model is developed to upscale core-scale observations, incorporating nanoparticle transport, thermal conduction, phase behavior, and wettability alteration. Sensitivity analyses assess the impact of reservoir temperature, salinity, and rock mineralogy (calcite vs. dolomite), as well as particle mobilization risks, potential pore plugging, and economic implications of nanoparticle synthesis and deployment. The results demonstrate that nanofluid-assisted thermal stimulation can achieve statistically significant increases in ultimate oil recovery (0β15 percentage points depending on permeability and mineralogy) compared with traditional thermal methods, with a notable uplift in sweep efficiency attributed to stabilized displacing fronts and favorable wettability shifts. However, optimal performance is contingent on maintaining nanoparticle stability at reservoir conditions and preventing excessive formation damage due to particle deposition. The study proposes a mechanistic framework linking nanofluid properties to macro-scale performance and provides guidelines for selecting nanoparticle types, concentrations, and thermal protocols tailored to low-permeability carbonate reservoirs. The outcomes offer practical pathways for field implementation, including well spacing considerations, thermal budget optimization, and monitoring strategies to mitigate risks, thereby advancing the viability of nanofluid-enhanced thermal EOR as a cost-effective option for mature carbonate fields.
Project Overview
What This Project Is About
A straightforward exploration of using tiny, engineered particles suspended in a liquid (nanofluids) to help steam or hot fluid push more oil out of rocks with very small pore spaces. The project combines simple cooling/heating methods with nanofluids to improve how easily oil moves through carbonate rocks that typically trap oil.
The Problem It Addresses
In low-permeability carbonate rocks, oil is difficult to extract because the rock blocks flow and traditional methods leave a lot of oil behind. Nanofluids can modify the rock surface and reduce oil sticking, while thermal methods provide the heat that makes oil flow more easily. The challenge is to understand if combining these approaches works well and safely in real reservoirs.
Objectives of the Project
- Explain the basic idea of nanofluid-assisted thermal EOR in simple terms.
- Assess how different nanofluids affect oil mobility in carbonate rocks.
- Evaluate the impact of temperature on oil recovery with nanofluids.
- Identify practical limitations and safety considerations for field use.
- Suggest a feasible experimental or simulation plan for further study.
What You Will Do Step by Step
1) Learn the basic concepts of oil recovery and why carbonate rocks are challenging. 2) Review simple literature findings on nanofluids and thermal methods. 3) Design a small-scale experiment or computer model to test oil flow with nanofluids at various temperatures. 4) Collect data on oil recovery under different conditions. 5) Analyze results to see if improvements are consistent and explain why. 6) Discuss practical steps before any real-world testing.
Expected Outcome
Clear, easy-to-understand conclusions on whether nanofluid-assisted thermal methods can boost oil recovery in low-permeability carbonate rocks, including potential benefits, limits, and the next steps for lab or field testing.