Impact of Farmer Field School Approach on Adoption of Climate-Resilient Practices among Smallholder Maize Farmers in [Region]

Project Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Farmer Field School (FFS) approach in promoting the adoption of climate-resilient agricultural practices among smallholder maize farmers in [Region], aiming to contribute evidence on scalable extension strategies under climate stress. A mixed-methods design was employed, combining a quasi-experimental panel with in-depth qualitative inquiries across two cohorts of farmers FFS participants and non-participants, tracked over three growing seasons. The primary outcome measures include adoption rates of climate-resilient practices (soil moisture conservation, crop diversification, drought-tolerant maize varieties, intercropping, timely planting, and optimized fertilizer use), yield fluctuations, input efficiency, and perceived risk management capacities. Secondary outcomes captured include knowledge acquisition, farmers’ empowerment, social learning processes, and networks formed within farmer groups. Quantitative data were collected through structured baseline and endline surveys (n ? 420 households per arm) and seasonal farm records, while qualitative data were obtained from focus group discussions, key informant interviews with extension agents, and participant observations in 12 FFS cycles. Difference-in-differences and propensity score matching were applied to estimate treatment effects, controlling for plot size, farmer age, education, access to credit, and market proximity. The analysis reveals that FFS participation significantly increased the likelihood of adopting two or more climate-resilient practices by 28 percentage points (p < 0.01) and improved maize yields by 12–18% under drought-prone conditions relative to controls. Mechanisms driving adoption include enhanced field-based experiential learning, collaborative problem-solving, peer accountability, and improved access to weather and climate information through extension linkages and farmer-managed demonstration plots. The program also strengthened risk coping strategies, as farmers diversified livelihoods and adopted weather-indexed insurance concepts introduced during FFS sessions. However, heterogeneity in adoption was observed, with higher gains among households with prior extension exposure, better market access, and stronger social networks; barriers included seed accessibility, upfront input costs, land tenure security, and limited capacity of some lead farmers to facilitate multiple cycles. The cost-benefit analysis indicates favorable returns on investment, with a break-even horizon of approximately 2.8 years and a benefit-cost ratio exceeding 1.6 under conservative yield scenarios. Qualitative findings highlight the importance of iterative learning cycles, gender-responsive facilitation, gendered access to resources, and the role of local champions in sustaining adoption. The study provides actionable recommendations for policymakers and development practitioners (i) scale FFS through district-level training hubs and integration with existing extension services; (ii) strengthen input supply chains and credit access to reduce initial adoption barriers; (iii) institutionalize peer-led monitoring and knowledge dissemination through farmer Field School alumni networks; (iv) tailor FFS content to local agro-ecologies and climate projections; and (v) incorporate farmer-to-farmer learning with weather advisories and climate risk financing. The findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of how FFS, as a participatory extension methodology, can effectively accelerate uptake of climate-resilient maize production practices among smallholders in climate-affected regions, while outlining pathways for sustainable program design and policy alignment.

Project Overview

What This Project Is About

---

A straightforward look at how Farmer Field School (FFS) methods influence smallholder maize farmers’ use of climate-resilient practices. It explores what FFS involves, why it is used, and how it might change farmers’ daily farming decisions and practices in a specific region.

---

---

The Problem It Addresses

---

Many smallholder maize farmers face climate-related risks and struggle to adopt new practices that reduce vulnerability. There is a gap in understanding whether FFS, a participatory learning method, actually leads to wider and faster adoption of climate-resilient techniques like improved planting times, soil management, and drought-tolerant maize varieties.

---

---

Objectives of the Project

---

1. Assess the extent to which FFS participation affects the adoption of climate-resilient practices among smallholder maize farmers.
2. Identify which components of FFS (peer learning, field demonstrations, farmer-led experimentation) influence adoption most.
3. Explore barriers and enablers to adoption within the local farming system.
4. Provide practical recommendations for improving FFS design to boost climate resilience.

---

---

What You Will Do Step by Step

---

1. Review literature on FFS and climate-resilient farming.
2. Design a study with participating farmers in the chosen region.
3. Collect data through surveys, focus groups, and field observations.
4. Analyze data to compare adopters and non-adopters and identify key influences.
5. Interpret results and relate them to existing knowledge.
6. Draft recommendations for policymakers and extension services.

---

---

Expected Outcome

Clear understanding of whether FFS supports adoption of climate-resilient practices, plus actionable steps to strengthen FFS programs and extension messaging to improve maize farming resilience.