EVALUATION OF THE MACRO-NUTRIENT STATUS OF THE CURRENT FIELD PRACTICAL TRAINING (305) EXPERIMENTAL FARMSITE,
Table Of Contents
- CHAPTER ONE1.0 Introduction-
- 11.1Background to Study-
- 11.2Statement of Problem-
- 21.3Objective of Study-
- 31.4Justification of the Study- 3CHAPTER TWO2.0 Literature Review-
- 52.1Soil Macronutrient-
- 52.2Primary Nutrients- 52.
- 2.1Nitrogen- 52.
- 2.2Phosphorus- 62.
- 2.3Potassium-
- 72.3Secondary Nutrients- 82.
- 3.1Calcium- 82.
- 3.2Magnesium- 82.
- 3.3Sulphur-
- 82.4Other Related Studies- 9CHAPTER THREE3.0 Research Methodology-
- 113.1History of the Study Area-
- 113.2Study Area-
- 113.3Climate and Vegetation-
- 123.4Sources of Material Used- 123.
- 5.pH-
- 123.6Electrical Conductivity-
- 133.7Organic Carbon-
- 143.8Available Phosphorus-
- 143.8Total Nitrogen-
- 153.9Exchangeable Bases- 16CHAPTER FOUR4.0 RESULT AND DISCUSSION-
- 184.1Chemical Properties of the Soil- 184.
- 1.1Soil pH- 204.
- 1.2Electrical Conductivity- 244.
- 1.3Percentage Organic Carbon- 264.
- 1.4Available Phosphorus- 284.
- 1.5Available Sulphur- 304.
- 1.6Total Nitrogen- 32CHAPTER FIVE5.0 CONLUSION AND SUMMARY-405.1Summary-405.2Recommendation- -41References-42Appendices-45LIST OF TABLETable1. The Chemical Properties of the Soil Macronutrient Under Study- 19LIST OF FIGURESFigure 1: pH of soil samples compared to the critical values-21Figure 2: EC of soil samples compared to the critical level-23Figure 3: Carbon level of soil samples compared to the critical level-25Figure 4: P level of soil samples compared to the critical level-27Figure 5: Sulphur level of samples compared to the critical level-39Figure 6: N level of soil samples compared to the critical level-31Figure 7: Calcium level of soil samples compared to the critical level-33Figure 8: Mg level of soil samples compared to the critical level-35Figure 9: Sodium level of soil samples compared to the critical level-37Figure 10: K level of soil samples compared to the critical level-39
Project Abstract
The current 305 Field Practical Training Farm site of the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Benin (Ugbowo), Benin City, Edo state in Nigeria was selected for the study. It has been used for cropping (sole and intercropping) over 12 years were analyzed chemically for the evaluation of basic soil parameters viz., pH, EC, OC and macronutrients such as N, P,K and S by using standard methods. Five locations were selected and five different composite samples for the five locations (0-15cm) each were taken and bulked into five. These were further analyzed for chemical properties and available N, P, K and S status. Results revealed that the soil was low in nutrient when compared to critical levels The Organic carbon, available N, Ca and K were low while the P content was high. The available S was quite high ranging from 5.88-10.47mg/kg.pH values were acidic within the range (4.6-5.6) while organic carbon percentage ranged from 1.02-1.57% in surface soils and increased with increasing depth. The Electrical Conductivity (EC) level ranged from 48.70-208g/kg. The concentration of the exchangeable cations were all in a decreasing order of magnitude; Ca++ >Mg++>Na+>K+. The percentage Base Saturation were generally low and rarely exceeding 28%. Available phosphorus ranged from 1.55-20.20mg/kg. Total Nitrogen 0.02-0.09% while exchange-acidity ranged from 0.05-1.00Cmol/kg. However, adequate measures are required to enrich the status of the top soil to increase productivity.
Project Overview
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND TO STUDY
Soil fertility is one
of the important factors controlling yields of the crops. Introduction
of high yielding varieties (HYV) in Nigeria Agriculture in mid-sixties
compelled the farmers to use high doses of NPK fertilizers. These are
needed in relatively large amounts. The soil must supply macronutrients
for desired growth of plants and synthesis of human food. However,
exploitive nature of modern agriculture involving use of organic manures
and less recycling of crop residues are important factors contributing
towards accelerated exhaustion of macronutrients from the soil. The
deficiencies of macronutrients have become major constraints to
productivity, stability and sustainability of soils. Soils with finer
particles and with higher organic matter can generally provide a greater
reserve of these elements whereas, coarse textured soils such as, sand
have fewer reserves and tend to get depleted rather quickly.
Soil
characterization in relation to evaluation of fertility status of the
soils of an area or region is an important aspect in context of
sustainable agricultural production. Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and
sulphur are important soil elements that control its fertility and
yields of the crops. Because of imbalanced and inadequate fertilizer use
coupled with low efficiency of other inputs, the response (production)
efficiency of chemical fertilizer nutrients has declined tremendously
under intensive agriculture in recent years. Variation in nutrient
supply is natural phenomenon and some of them may be sufficient where
others deficient. The stagnation in crop productivity cannot be boosted
without judicious use of macronutrient fertilizers to overcome existing
deficiencies/imbalances.
1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Soil
macronutrients (i.e., Nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K))
are essential to plants (H. Marschner, 1995). They provide nutrients
necessary for plant growth, which are important to maintain ecosystems
and high crop yields. However, macronutrients, particularly N, and P can
be potentially hazardous to water resources when their available
components in soils are excessive, because available macronutrients can
be transported off site in runoff due to rain or irrigation (T. Matoh,
(2004), V. H. Smith,etal (1998). Improper or excessive fertilization has
increasingly become a serious problem and the eutrophication problem
caused by the losses of N and P from farmland to water bodies has caught
peopleΓ’β¬β’s attentions (A. Sharpley, (1995), Y. Chen,etal(2010).
Therefore, proper management of soil N, P, and K is necessary to avoid
deteriorating the environment while meeting the requirement of high crop
productivity. In addition, reducing the losses of macronutrients from
farmland also can save the costs spent on fertilizers.
Most of
macronutrient contents exist in fixed forms in soils (e.g., contained in
organic matter and minerals) and thus cannot be directly utilized by
plants or transported to water bodies. Part of fertilizers applied to
soil also can be fixed by soil and thus become unavailable to plants.
This means that the total content of a macronutrient in soil is only a
potentially available content in a long term, rather than its currently
available content. Apparently the total content and the available
content of a macronutrient are two different measures for the
macronutrient in soil, and it is the availability ratio (i.e., available
concentration/total concentration) that represents the potential
effectiveness of a specific macronutrient in soil. That is to say, all
the three indices may be necessary to understand the general situation
of a macronutrient in soil. It is, therefore, important to investigate
the spatial variability of availability ratios of soil macronutrients
and corresponding controlling factors so that proper measures may be
taken to modify the availability of the macronutrients for site-specific
management.
The information on availability of macro nutrients
of the study area is meager. Therefore, the present study was undertaken
to know the macro nutrients status of soils of the Current Field
Practical Training (305) Farm site of the Faculty of Agriculture,
University of Benin (Ugbowo), Benin City, Edo state in Nigeria and an
attempt was also made to correlate macro nutrients content of the soils
with other soil properties.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The
main objective of this research study is basically to evaluate the
macronutrient status of the Current Field Practical Training (305)
Experimental Farm site soils of the University of Benin (Ugbowo Campus)
in Benin City, Edo state in Nigeria. To achieve the main objective;
these are the following specific objectives;
Evaluate the macro-nutrients status of the soils on the farm site in the study area.
Ascertain
what macro-nutrients is suppose to be sufficient or low for plant
growth, survival and optimal yield in the study area.
Quantify the fertility of the soil in the study area.
1.4 JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY
Soils play an important role to describe the economical growth of the study area.
Soil
fertility evaluation of an area or region is an important aspect in
context of sustainable agricultural production. The macro nutrients
govern the fertility of the soils and control the yields of crops. One
of the most important keys to a productive pasture is good soil
fertility. Nutrients are used by plants to perform a number of functions
necessary to complete their life cycles. Certain nutrients called
essential nutrients are required by the plant; the plant cannot carry
out normal growth without each and every one of them being present in
adequate amounts. Macronutrients are required by plants in greater
amounts than micronutrients due to their functions. Macronutrients are
used in building tissues and proteins within a plant, which make up the
bulk of it. Nutrients are constantly being removed from the soil. They
can be lost by plant uptake, leaching through the soil profile, and
erosion. In some cases, many of these elements may already be present
but are tied up by soil particles, making them unavailable to plants.
Some
soil types may be naturally high in one element but low in another.
Generally, the mineral nutrients which are used the most (i.e.
macronutrients) will need to be added most frequently. Also, some
nutrients are more mobile in the soil than others. This results in a
loss by leaching and reiterates the importance of proper application
rates, as these types of nutrients may affect groundwater if they are
over-applied.