An assessment of students response to television reality programmes
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of study
- 1.5Limitation of study
- 1.6Scope of study
- 1.7Significance of study
- 1.8Structure of the research
- 1.9Definition of terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Evolution of Reality Television
- 2.2Types of Reality TV Shows
- 2.3Influence of Reality TV on Society
- 2.4Impact on Participants
- 2.5Psychological Effects of Watching Reality TV
- 2.6Reality TV and Pop Culture
- 2.7Criticisms of Reality TV
- 2.8Reality TV and Social Media
- 2.9Globalization of Reality TV
- 2.10Ethics in Reality TV Production
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design
- 3.2Sampling Methods
- 3.3Data Collection Techniques
- 3.4Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.5Ethical Considerations
- 3.6Research Validity and Reliability
- 3.7Research Limitations
- 3.8Research Challenges
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Findings
- 4.2Participants' Responses to Reality TV
- 4.3Preferences and Viewing Habits
- 4.4Emotional Engagement with Reality TV
- 4.5Impact on Behavior and Attitudes
- 4.6Gender Differences in Response
- 4.7Cultural Variances in Perception
- 4.8Comparison with Previous Studies
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusions Drawn
- 5.3Implications for Future Research
- 5.4Practical Recommendations
- 5.5Contribution to the Field
Project Abstract
Television reality programmes have become a significant part of popular culture, attracting a vast audience of viewers, including students. This research aims to assess students' responses to television reality programmes and explore the impact of these shows on their attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining surveys and focus group discussions to gather comprehensive data. The research findings reveal that students have varying responses to television reality programmes, with some expressing strong interest and engagement, while others exhibit skepticism and critical views. The analysis indicates that students often watch reality shows for entertainment purposes, seeking drama, excitement, and escapism from their daily routines. Additionally, students perceive reality programmes as a source of information and inspiration, providing insights into different lifestyles, relationships, and challenges. However, the study also identifies several concerns regarding the influence of television reality programmes on students. There is evidence of potential negative impacts, such as unrealistic expectations, distorted perceptions of reality, and reinforcement of stereotypes. Moreover, students' exposure to excessive drama, conflicts, and sensationalism in reality shows can lead to desensitization and desensitization to real-life issues. Furthermore, the research highlights the role of social comparison and parasocial relationships in shaping students' responses to television reality programmes. Students often compare themselves to the participants on these shows, leading to feelings of inadequacy or superiority. Moreover, students may develop parasocial relationships with reality TV stars, feeling connected to them despite the mediated nature of the interactions. Overall, the study underscores the complex and multifaceted nature of students' responses to television reality programmes. While these shows offer entertainment, information, and social connections, they also raise significant concerns about their potential impact on students' attitudes and behaviors. The findings emphasize the importance of media literacy education to help students critically analyze and evaluate the content they consume, especially in the context of reality television. By fostering a more discerning and reflective approach to media consumption, students can navigate the diverse influences of television reality programmes more effectively and responsibly.
Project Overview
<p>
</p><p><strong>INTRODUCTION</strong></p><p><strong>1.1 Background of the Study</strong></p><p>The mass media, most especially television has become a part of our daily lives, and sources of information, education and entertainment have been described as the primary functions of the media. Lasswell (1948) as cited in Folarin (2005,p.74), assigns three functions to the media:</p><p>v Surveillance of the Environment (the news function).</p><p>v Correlation of the different parts of the Environment (the editorial function).</p><p>v Transmission of the cultural heritage from one generation to the other (the cultural transmission function). (pg 74).</p><p>There is no doub t that the impact of television broadcasting on young people’s lives is broadly considered within what is referred to as “media effects” debate which to a great extent focuses on the potentially negative impact of television on young people’s lives: video violence, gambling, educational performance, television consumerism, etc (Miles 2000,p.87). Steele, J. R. & Brown, J. D. (2005,p.87), identifies three main reasons why television influence should be given a closer look:</p><p>v Young people spend more time with the mass media than they do in school or with their parents.</p><p>v The media are full of portrayals that glamorize risky adult behavior such as excessive drinking and sexual promiscuity.</p><p>v Parents and other socialization agents have arguably shirked their responsibilities when it comes to directing youth away from risky forms of behavior; thereby allowing the media a more fundamental influence.</p><p>In the context of this discourse, many commentators opine that by the age of 18, an individual will have spent more time watching television than any other activity besides sleep (Anderson, 2009,p.76). However, Miles (2000, p.73) is of the view that:</p><p>It is widely assumed that young people are affected more directly and negatively by the media than any other age group, research actually indicates that young people between the ages of 14 and 24 actually form one of the groups who currently spend the least time watching television. This is a paradox that has often been neglected in the literature. Ironically, the mass media itself has a vested interest in exaggerating the impact it has on young people’s lives because media-hype simply makes good ‘copy.’</p><p>Regardless of the actual time young people spend in watching television and using other media, there is no doubt that television broadcasting have played an important role in structuring young people’s lives in some shape and form in a period of rapid social change (Osgerby, 2008,p.12).</p><p>The amount of television programes consumed by young people has drastically expanded in recent years, allowing them to compose their own ‘media menu’ with their own preferences and likings. The youth itself is undergoing a period of rapid change, likewise the ways in which young people use the media. The advent of cable and satellite television has boosted television viewing in recent years (Johnson, 2004). Osgerby (2008,p.20), further points out that “the post-modern age brought with it the proliferation of media and information technologies which challenged traditional conceptions of time and space, symbolized most apparently by the global cultural flows and images evident in the programming of Music Television (MTV). MTV is well known as an entertainment television that airs not only music videos, but reality TV shows and other entertainment programmes”.</p><p>Reimer (2005,p.67), posits that young people’s use of the mass media binds them together more than any social activity (and hence their relationship with social change). Young people could be said to be united through their pursuit of pleasure through the mass media. The media (or the people behind it) are skilled at knowing what will appeal to the mass teenagers and use skillful manipulation to get messages across, buy into an idea or product that communicates an idea – like the status of having the latest ipod, i-touch or cell phone. However, Allahar (2006,p.54), argue that the manner in which television portray aspects of the outside world might be said to actively prevent young people from developing a critical consciousness that will allow them prioritize larger issues of personal and social responsibility.</p><p>Since they are bombarded with tantalizing images of the ‘good life,’ it is not surprising that the young are dispirited by the reality of their poor economic prospects. What lies at the heart of all this activity, however, is the fact that televison can sell young people some element of an identity they have been taught to crave… leisure industries such as music, fashion, and cosmetics have a largely uncritical army of consumers awaiting the next craze or fad. (Allahar, 2006, p.148).</p><p>Reality television show has in recent time significantly proved to be a favourite among the youth – particularly those who fall within the range of ages 18-25 (Chikafe 2012,p.76). Among these programmes is the Big Brother Nigeria which is the focus of this study and hereafter referred to as “Big Brother Naija”. Other common ones here in Nigeria include: MTN Project Fame, Gul etc. “Big Brother Naija”, is a reality TV show based on the Big Brother TV series in which 12 contestants live in an isolated house and compete for a large cash prize worth $100000 at the end of the show by avoiding being evicted by viewers. The first season of the show first aired on DStv Channel 37 from March 5 to June 4, 2006. The voting results are verified by the auditing company of Alexander-Forbes. Chikafa, (2012,p.54), writes that the concept was borrowed from George Orwell’s novel of 1984 titled ‘fictional dystopia of Oceania’ in which he described a world of never-ending surveillance. In the novel, the dictator who watched over the citizens of Oceania was called Big Brother, and his terrifying slogan was ‘Big Brother is watching you’. In the Big Brother television show, contestants confined in the house compete to escape eviction in order to win the prize money. The reality TV show debuted on DSTV channel 37 in 2016 and has since then, with the aid of the growth of satellite television in</p><p>Africa, roused African audience interest and has remained an annual event till date (Mateveke 2012).</p>
<br><p></p>