Zoning policy and the development of democracy in nigeria

Project Abstract

This research project focuses on exploring the relationship between zoning policy and the development of democracy in Nigeria. Zoning policy, a practice of power-sharing and rotation among different regions or ethnic groups, has been a prominent feature of Nigeria's political landscape. The study seeks to investigate how zoning policy influences democratic governance in Nigeria and its implications for political stability and inclusivity. The research will employ a mixed-method approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative methods to gather data. Quantitative data will be collected through surveys and analysis of secondary data on political trends and governance outcomes in Nigeria. Qualitative data will be gathered through interviews with key stakeholders such as policymakers, political analysts, and civil society representatives to provide in-depth insights into the impact of zoning policy on democracy in Nigeria. The study aims to analyze the historical evolution of zoning policy in Nigeria and its impact on electoral politics, political representation, and power dynamics within the country. By examining the role of zoning in shaping the distribution of political power and resources, the research seeks to uncover how this practice influences the consolidation or erosion of democratic principles in Nigeria. Furthermore, the research will investigate the relationship between zoning policy and issues of political inclusivity, social cohesion, and national unity in Nigeria. By exploring how zoning arrangements affect the representation of marginalized groups and the distribution of opportunities in the political sphere, the study aims to provide insights into the potential benefits and drawbacks of this policy on democracy and governance. Overall, this research project contributes to the existing literature on democratization in Nigeria by shedding light on the role of zoning policy in shaping the country's political landscape. By examining the interplay between zoning arrangements and democratic development, the study aims to provide valuable insights for policymakers, scholars, and practitioners interested in understanding the complexities of governance and democracy in Nigeria.

Project Overview

<p> <strong>INTRODUCTION</strong><br><strong>1.1 Background to the study</strong><br>The zoning policy has really caused a lot of political instability in the country as a result of disagreement among politicians but in spite of that it still brings about development of democracy. A recent pieces in the economists highlights the system of zoning, that Nigeria employs to alternate power between the north and south of the country. In the economists word. “candidates are picked alternatively from north and south behind closed doors and presented to voters in rigged polls”. Since independence 50 years ago, Nigeria has not achieved its full potential as the giant of Africa public services across the country<br>are all but non-existent, corruption rife and democracy in the time meaning of the word is not being practiced. For many decades, presidential politics in Nigeria has been saddled with ethnicity or tribal politics, religious intolerance and more recently electoral malpractices, well meaning and patritic elements in the polity had wrested with the idea of the best formula that will guarantee peace and stability in the country. Historically the highest political office in the land has been dominated by the countries citizen’s of northern extradition. This was made possible by subsequent military regimes whose<br>brands of leadership has no space for democratic contraception. The zoning formula was therefore envisage to enable the northern and southern Nigeria to have an equal chance of producing the president during an eight year presidential cycle. The zoning formula was first adopted by the second civilian administration of Alhaji Shehu Shagari and Dr. Alex Ekwueme in 1979, during the first quarter of president Shagari’s second term, the military led by general Buhari truncated regime, thereby making it impossible for southern Nigerian to experience the plan. During the consecutive 15 years of northern dominated military governance, the zoning formula was forgotten for the past ten years, beginning with Chief Olusegun Obasanjo’s civilian regime 1999-2007, and the administration of Shehu Musa Yar’dua and president Goodluck Jonathan 2007 to president, the (PDP) Peoples Democratic Party had started dangling the carrot of the presidential zoning between the southern and the northern sections of the country. Advocates of presidential zoning often cite peace and stability in the policy as the main reason, but Nigerians must seriously ask themselves how zoning both presidential down to even gubernitorial<br>elections have been able to bring peace and stability (development), can zoning or quota produce the best leadership material suitable for development desperately needed at this critical time. According to professor J.T Nwabueze, zoning and rotation principle or policy is part of a democratic culture used for fair play. He went further to say that it counters the negative impulse and tendency of a group of people to remain in office as long as possible and use the resources of the nation to service its narrow and practical interest. It also offers itself as an antidote to a practice that engenders nepotism, promotes<br>corruption, and breed ineiciency, which in turn stultifies growth abs sustainable development. Ifedi Andi Okwenna, 2009, also opined that if power is allowed to systematically rotate between the various zones the political space will not only widen, the process will definitely throw out capable leaders who can transform our country and move it to greater height. <br></p>