Terrorism and nigerias economy an assessement of the bokappraisal of the quality of political communication during 2015 general elections..o haram insurgency
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Political Communication
- 2.2Historical Perspectives of Political Communication
- 2.3Theories of Political Communication
- 2.4Models of Political Communication
- 2.5Types of Political Communication
- 2.6Role of Media in Political Communication
- 2.7Impact of Political Communication on Society
- 2.8Challenges in Political Communication
- 2.9Innovations in Political Communication
- 2.10Comparative Analysis of Political Communication Strategies
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Methodology Overview
- 3.2Research Design
- 3.3Data Collection Methods
- 3.4Sampling Techniques
- 3.5Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.6Ethical Considerations
- 3.7Validity and Reliability
- 3.8Limitations of the Methodology
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Data
- 4.3Discussion on Key Findings
- 4.4Comparison with Literature Review
- 4.5Implications of Findings
- 4.6Recommendations for Future Research
- 4.7Practical Applications of Findings
- 4.8Conclusion of Findings
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Research
- 5.2Conclusions Drawn
- 5.3Contributions to Knowledge
- 5.4Implications for Practice
- 5.5Recommendations for Action
- 5.6Suggestions for Further Research
- 5.7Reflection on Research Process
- 5.8Closing Remarks
Project Abstract
Terrorism remains a significant threat to Nigeria's economy, with the Boko Haram insurgency being a major concern. This research project assesses the impact of terrorism, particularly the activities of Boko Haram, on Nigeria's economy. The study focuses on the period leading up to and following the 2015 general elections in Nigeria, analyzing the quality of political communication during this time. The research aims to evaluate how the Boko Haram insurgency has influenced Nigeria's economy and political landscape, with a specific focus on the 2015 general elections. By assessing the quality of political communication during this period, the study seeks to understand how effective communication strategies were in addressing the threat of terrorism and shaping public perceptions. Through a comprehensive analysis of primary and secondary data sources, including government reports, economic indicators, and media coverage, the research project explores the economic costs of terrorism in Nigeria. It examines the direct and indirect impacts of Boko Haram's activities on various sectors of the economy, such as agriculture, oil production, and foreign investment. Furthermore, the study investigates the role of political communication in shaping public discourse and government responses to the Boko Haram insurgency. By examining the messaging strategies employed by political leaders, security agencies, and civil society organizations, the research evaluates the effectiveness of communication efforts in countering the terrorist threat. The findings of this research project have important implications for policymakers, security agencies, and communication professionals in Nigeria. By understanding the economic consequences of terrorism and the role of political communication in addressing security challenges, stakeholders can develop more effective strategies to combat terrorism and promote economic stability. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive assessment of the relationship between terrorism, political communication, and Nigeria's economy. By analyzing the impact of the Boko Haram insurgency on the country's economic development and political environment, the research contributes to a better understanding of the challenges and opportunities facing Nigeria in its efforts to address terrorism and promote sustainable growth.
Project Overview
<p>
</p><p><strong>1.0 INTRODUCTION</strong></p><p><strong>1.1 Background of the Study</strong></p><p>Political Communication is a sub-field of political science and communication that deals with the production, dissemination, procession and effects of information, both through media and interpersonally, within a political context. This includes the study of the media, the analysis of speeches by politicians and those that are trying to influence the political process, and formal and informal conversations among members of the public, among other aspects. The media acts as bridge between government and public. The study and practice of political communication focuses on the ways and means of expression of a political nature. Robert E. Denton and Gary C. Woodward, two important contributors to the field, in <em>Political Communication in America</em> characterize it as the ways and intentions of message senders to influence the political environment. This includes public discussion (e.g. political speeches, news media coverage, and ordinary citizens’ talk) that considers who has authority to sanction, the allocation of public resources, who has authority to make decision, as well as social meaning like what makes someone American. In their words “the crucial factor that makes communication ‘political’ is not the source of a message, but its content and purpose.” David L. Swanson and Dan Nimmo, also key members of this sub-discipline, define political communication as “the strategic use of communication to influence public knowledge, beliefs, and action on political matters.” They emphasize the strategic nature of political communication, highlighting the role of persuasion in political discourse. Brian McNair provides a similar definition when he writes that political communication is “purposeful communication about politics.” For McNair this means that this not only covers verbal or written statements, but also visual representations such as dress, make-up, hairstyle or logo design. With other words, it also includes all those aspects that develop a “political identity” or “image”. Reflecting on the relationship between political communication and contemporary agenda-building, Vian Bakir defines Strategic Political Communication (SPC) as comprising ‘political communication that is manipulative in intent, that utilises social scientific techniques and heuristic devices to understand human motivation, human behavior and the media environment, to inform effectively what should be communicated – encompassing its detail and overall direction – and what should be withheld, with the aim of taking into account and influencing public opinion, and creating strategic alliances and an enabling environment for government policies – both at home and abroad’. </p><p>There are many academic departments and schools around the world that specialize in political communication. These programs are housed in programs of communication, journalism and political science, among others. The study of political communication is clearly interdisciplinary.</p><p>Political communications is an interactive process concerning the transmission of information among politicians, the news media and the public. The process operates down-wards from governing institutions towards citizens, horizontally in linkages among political actors, and also upwards from public opinion towards authorities.</p><p><strong>1.2 Statement of problem</strong></p><p>During the 2015 governorship election in Enugu State, as in other parts of Nigeria, politicians made all manner promises to the general public which they used to sell their parties and the candidates on their platforms. That advertising was delivered does not necessarily mean that it was received, nor does it imply that it was understood and accepted as truthful, such that it actually influenced the behaviour of the electorate in Enugu State during the governorship election. Or were there intervening variables in the communication process? It is in the light of the above that the study decided to investigate the quality of political communication during 2015 general elections.</p><p><strong>1.3 Objective of the study</strong></p><p>This research work titled “appraisal of the quality of political communication during 2015 general elections” The objectives of this research work includes the following;</p><p>1. To appraise the quality of political communication during the 2015 election in Nigeria.</p><p>2. To examine the impact of political communication on the success of 2015 election.</p><p>3. To evaluate the impact of political communication on the development of Nigeria.</p><p>4. To examine the challenges faced by Nigerian 2015 election.</p><p><strong>1.4 Research questions</strong></p><p>1. What is the quality of political communication during the 2015 election in Nigeria?</p><p>2. Does political communication have any impact on the success of 2015 election?</p><p>3. What are the impacts of political communication on the development of Nigeria?</p><p>4. What are the challenges faced by Nigerian 2015 election.</p><p><strong>1.6 Significance of the study</strong></p><p>This research work will be of immense help to the following group of individuals;</p><p>This research work will be of immense help to the researcher as it will help him to know more on the quality of political communication during the 2015 election in Nigeria.</p><p>This study will also be of great importance to politicians in the country as it will enrich their knowledge on the quality of political communication during the 2015 election in Nigeria.</p><p>This study will be of great importance to students and other researchers since it will serve as a reference point for the upcoming researchers.</p><p>This research work will also be of immense help to the general public as it will help the policy makers to enact laws that will guide the quality of political communication in Nigeria.</p>
<br><p></p>