A pragmatic trial of parent-focused prevention in pediatric primary care: implementation and adolescent health outcomes in three health systems
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Parent-Focused Prevention
- 2.2Theoretical Frameworks in Adolescent Health
- 2.3Previous Studies on Parent-Focused Interventions
- 2.4Impact of Parental Involvement on Adolescent Health
- 2.5Effectiveness of Parent-Focused Programs
- 2.6Challenges in Implementing Parent-Focused Interventions
- 2.7Strategies for Successful Parent-Focused Prevention
- 2.8Technology and Parent-Focused Interventions
- 2.9Cultural Considerations in Parent-Focused Programs
- 2.10Future Directions in Parent-Focused Prevention
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design and Rationale
- 3.2Sampling Methods and Participant Selection
- 3.3Data Collection Techniques
- 3.4Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.5Ethical Considerations
- 3.6Pilot Testing and Validation
- 3.7Instrumentation and Tools
- 3.8Reliability and Validity Measures
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Findings
- 4.2Demographic Analysis
- 4.3Parental Participation Rates
- 4.4Impact on Adolescent Health Outcomes
- 4.5Comparison with Control Groups
- 4.6Qualitative Feedback from Participants
- 4.7Implementation Challenges and Solutions
- 4.8Recommendations for Future Research
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusions
- 5.3Implications for Practice
- 5.4Contributions to the Field
- 5.5Recommendations for Policy
- 5.6Reflections on the Study
- 5.7Areas for Future Research
- 5.8Final Thoughts and Closing Remarks
Project Abstract
<p> Fifty percent of all adolescents will use some form of illicit drugs before the end of high school, 20-25% will meet criteria for depression, and many others will engage in health compromising behaviors like delinquency and violence—with consequences for their long-term health. Evidence-based interventions shown to prevent these behavioral health concerns could improve adolescent health trajectories if implemented widely in pediatric primary care. The American Academy of Pediatrics’ Bright Futures recommends that pediatricians offer developmentally tailored anticipatory guidance to all parents to support their children’s healthy development, but programs providing guidance are not offered universally. This cooperative agreement is part of the National Center for Complimentary and Integrative Medicine’s pragmatic clinical trial collaboratory and tests the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing Guiding Good Choices (GGC), a universal, evidence-based anticipatory guidance curriculum for parents of early adolescents. The pragmatic trial is conducted in three large, integrated healthcare systems in California, Colorado and Michigan serving socioeconomically diverse families. GGC reduced adolescent alcohol, tobacco and marijuana use, depression, and general delinquency in two previous rigorous randomized controlled trials. It also strengthened parenting practices and parent-adolescent relationship quality, both broadly protective against behavioral health concerns. GGC has the capacity to achieve population-level impact on adolescent health if made widely available through pediatric primary care. Parents trust pediatricians’ advice regarding their children’s well-being, and current research with socioeconomically diverse groups suggests that they are eager to participate in family-focused programs offered in primary care clinics. Building on this body of research, the investigative team, in close cooperation with the NIH Healthcare Systems Research Collaboratory and healthcare systems partners, will conduct a cluster-randomized trial of Guiding Good Choices in 72 pediatric primary care practices. Half will be randomly assigned to offer the program universally to parents of adolescents ages 11 to 12, and half will serve as usual care controls. The team will use the RE-AIM framework to test implementation outcomes and effectiveness, including hypothesized reductions in several behavioral health problems (e.g., substance use initiation, mental health symptoms and diagnoses), and emergency department and inpatient service utilization. We will use data from the EHR and a supplemental behavioral health survey to monitor outcomes up to 3 years post intervention. We will also assess the feasibility and sustainability of implementing the intervention in each HCS, including health economic evaluation to understand costs in relation to value gained. We anticipate that evidence of feasibility and effectiveness in three different HCS will foster broad dissemination to achieve public health impact. <br></p>
Project Overview