Evaluation of elephant grass (pennisetum purpureum) as substrate for bioethanol production using co-cultures of aspergillus niger and saccharomyces cerevisiae
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Bioethanol Production
- 2.2Properties of Elephant Grass (Pennisetum purpureum)
- 2.3Aspergillus Niger in Bioethanol Production
- 2.4Saccharomyces Cerevisiae in Bioethanol Production
- 2.5Co-Cultures in Bioethanol Production
- 2.6Bioethanol Substrates
- 2.7Fermentation Process in Bioethanol Production
- 2.8Challenges in Bioethanol Production
- 2.9Advancements in Bioethanol Technology
- 2.10Environmental Impacts of Bioethanol Production
Chapter THREE
SYSTEM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
- 3.1Research Methodology Overview
- 3.2Selection of Elephant Grass Substrate
- 3.3Cultivation and Maintenance of Aspergillus Niger
- 3.4Cultivation and Maintenance of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
- 3.5Co-Culture Preparation and Optimization
- 3.6Fermentation Process Design
- 3.7Analytical Techniques for Bioethanol Quantification
- 3.8Data Collection and Analysis Methods
Chapter FOUR
SYSTEM TESTING AND EVALUATION
- 4.1Analysis of Bioethanol Yield
- 4.2Effects of Substrate Concentration on Bioethanol Production
- 4.3Influence of Co-Culture Ratios on Bioethanol Yield
- 4.4Comparison of Aspergillus Niger and Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Performances
- 4.5Optimization of Fermentation Conditions
- 4.6Challenges Encountered in the Study
- 4.7Implications of Findings on Bioethanol Industry
- 4.8Future Research Directions
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Contributions to Bioethanol Production
- 5.4Recommendations for Future Studies
Project Abstract
<p> </p><p>Elephant grass (<em>Pennisetum purpureum</em>) was evaluated for its ethanol production potential using co-cultures of <em>Aspergillus niger</em> and <em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em>isolated from local sources. Proximate and lignocellulose analysis carried out on the plant sample showed that it had crude fibre, lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose contents of 31.5%, 26.78%, 18.76% and 34.16% respectively. <em>Aspergillus niger</em> strains were isolated from soil and bread and were further screened for both qualitative and quantitative cellulase production. Qualitative cellulase assay revealed clear zones around colonies indicative of enzyme activity on solid agar medium containing 0.1% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) for all the isolates. Quantitative cellulase assay showed that <em>A. niger</em> isolate AN-15 from soil gave highest cellulase yield of (0.1792 IU/ml/min) and was therefore selected as a co-culture with</p><p><em>S. cerevisiae</em>.<em> Saccharomyces cerevisiae </em>strains were isolated from palm wine and burukutu.Isolate PW-4 was selected for fermentation based on ethanol tolerance tests and assimilation of more sugars compared to other isolates. Fermentation of grass substrate was carried out at different concentrations ranging from 2-10% and highest ethanol yield of 1.68g/100ml was observed at an optimum substrate concentration of 6% though the yield was much less than that obtained from equal concentration of glucose (8.38g/100ml). Optimization of culture parameters for ethanol production showed maximum ethanol yield at pH 5, 35oC and agitation rate of 300 rpm. The results of the research also revealed that ethanol production by <em>S. cerevisiae</em> beyond the fourth day of fermentation is significantly reduced.</p><p> </p> <br><p></p>
Project Overview
<p>
</p><p><strong>1.0</strong> <strong>INTRODUCTION</strong></p><div>Ethanol fuel, ethyl alcohol (CH3CH2OH), is the same type of alcohol found in alcoholic beverages. It is an oxygenated fuel with a high octane value like that of petroleum fuels known to run combustion engines at higher compression ratios and thus provides superior performance (Wheals <em>et al</em>., 1999). The blending of ethanol into petroleum-based automobile fuels can significantly decrease petroleum use and decrease the release of greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, ethanol can be a safer alternative to the common additive, methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), in gasoline. Methyl tertiary butyl ether is toxic and is a known contaminant in ground water. Thus, ethanol can be a substitute to mitigate the problems associated with the rising energy demands across the world as well as a way to reduce greenhouse gas emission to as high as 85% (Perlack <em>et al</em>., 2005).</div><p>Ethanol may be produced either from petroleum products or from biomass substrate. Today, most of the ethanol produced comes from renewable resources (Bothast and Saha, 1997). Although, most of the ethanol currently produced from renewable resources come from sugarcane and starchy grains, significant efforts are being made to produce ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass (almost 50% of all biomass in the biosphere such as agricultural residues are lignocellulosic biomass). The technological advances in recent years are promising to produce ethanol at low cost from lignocellulosic biomass (Bothast and Saha, 1997).</p><p>Bioethanol production from sugarcane and starch-rich feed stocks such as corn, potato, is considered a first generation process because it has already been developed (Joshi <em>et al</em>., 2011).</p>
<br><p></p>