The role of the public complaints commission in protecting worker’s rights against administrative injustice and maladministration in nigeria
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Administrative Injustice
- 2.2Understanding Worker’s Rights
- 2.3Role of Public Complaints Commission
- 2.4Legal Framework for Protecting Worker’s Rights
- 2.5Previous Studies on Administrative Injustice
- 2.6Impact of Maladministration on Workers
- 2.7International Perspectives on Worker’s Rights
- 2.8Strategies for Addressing Administrative Injustice
- 2.9Case Studies of Worker’s Rights Violations
- 2.10Theoretical Framework for Analyzing Worker’s Rights
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design and Methodology
- 3.2Sampling Techniques
- 3.3Data Collection Methods
- 3.4Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.5Ethical Considerations
- 3.6Research Limitations
- 3.7Validity and Reliability
- 3.8Research Instrumentation
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Research Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Worker’s Rights Violations
- 4.3Public Complaints Commission Interventions
- 4.4Factors Influencing Administrative Injustice
- 4.5Recommendations for Addressing Worker’s Rights Violations
- 4.6Comparison with International Standards
- 4.7Implications for Policy and Practice
- 4.8Future Research Directions
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Contributions to Knowledge
- 5.4Practical Implications
- 5.5Recommendations for Stakeholders
- 5.6Areas for Further Research
Project Abstract
<p> </p><p>This research project is titled “The Role of the Public Complaints Commission</p><p>in Protecting Worker’s Rights against Administrative Injustice and</p><p>Maladministration in Nigeria”. The research work has been prompted by the</p><p>observation made on the decline in the discharge of its roles in some state</p><p>offices of the Commission, despite overall achievement of organizational</p><p>target. The main purpose of this research therefore was to find out what must</p><p>have been responsible for the decline. To achieve this, data were collected and</p><p>interview conducted. In the data collected, simple descriptive presentations in</p><p>Annual reports were consulted. In the course of this research, findings revealed</p><p>that limitations of the Act have made a negative impact on the performance of</p><p>Commission’s staff, but that the staff encounters problems while carrying out</p><p>their respective jobs. Responses also revealed that the Commission needs to</p><p>continually conduct training programmes especially on investigation, as that</p><p>will boost staff performance. Finally, the argument in this work is that,</p><p>although the PCC has recorded some achievements regarding the discharge of</p><p>its mandate from the time of its inception to date, it might not be rated high on</p><p>its score board. In this regard, (the researcher/study) have made</p><p>recommendations that will have far reaching significance and they are sure to</p><p>make the commission more focused, more robust and more dynamic, if they are</p><p>judiciously implemented.</p> <br><p></p>
Project Overview
<p>
</p><p> <strong>INTRODUCTION</strong></p><p><strong>1.1</strong> <strong>BACKGROUND</strong></p><p>Hon. Chief Justice J.V. Milvain of the trial division of the Supreme</p><p>court of Albarat, Canada delivering judgement on 6th January 1990 in the case</p><p>of “Feldbrugge V. Netherland A/100/1986 where the complainant was refused</p><p>the payment of his social benefit after he fell sick and was retired as a result of</p><p>ill health – held that the right to continue to receive benefit after sickness is</p>
<br><p></p>