The imperatives of international criminal tribunals and international criminal court on crime of genocide

 

Table Of Contents


Chapter ONE

INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1Introduction
  • 1.2Background of Study
  • 1.3Problem Statement
  • 1.4Objective of Study
  • 1.5Limitation of Study
  • 1.6Scope of Study
  • 1.7Significance of Study
  • 1.8Structure of the Research
  • 1.9Definition of Terms

Chapter TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

  • 2.1Overview of International Criminal Tribunals
  • 2.2History of International Criminal Court
  • 2.3Legal Framework of Genocide
  • 2.4Case Studies of Genocide Trials
  • 2.5Role of International Criminal Tribunals in Combating Genocide
  • 2.6Challenges Faced by International Criminal Tribunals
  • 2.7Successes of International Criminal Tribunals
  • 2.8Critiques of International Criminal Court
  • 2.9Comparative Analysis of International Criminal Tribunals
  • 2.10Future Prospects of International Criminal Law

Chapter THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  • 3.1Research Design
  • 3.2Data Collection Methods
  • 3.3Sampling Techniques
  • 3.4Data Analysis Procedures
  • 3.5Ethical Considerations
  • 3.6Research Limitations
  • 3.7Research Validity and Reliability
  • 3.8Research Findings Interpretation

Chapter FOUR

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS

  • 4.1Overview of Research Findings
  • 4.2Analysis of Data
  • 4.3Discussion on Key Findings
  • 4.4Comparison with Existing Literature
  • 4.5Implications of Findings
  • 4.6Recommendations for Policy and Practice
  • 4.7Future Research Directions
  • 4.8Theoretical Contributions

Chapter FIVE

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

  • 5.1Summary of Research
  • 5.2Conclusions Drawn
  • 5.3Contributions to Knowledge
  • 5.4Practical Implications
  • 5.5Recommendations for Further Action

Project Abstract

<p> <em>The</em>&nbsp;<em>idea</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>a</em>&nbsp;<em>strong</em>&nbsp;<em>standing</em>&nbsp;<em>tribunal</em>&nbsp;<em>to</em>&nbsp;<em>try</em>&nbsp;<em>serious</em>&nbsp;<em>violations</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>international</em>&nbsp;<em>law</em>&nbsp;<em>has</em>&nbsp;<em>been</em>&nbsp;<em>around</em>&nbsp;<em>since</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>end</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>World</em>&nbsp;<em>War</em>&nbsp;<em>II.</em>&nbsp;<em>After</em>&nbsp;<em>WWII,</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>Nuremberg</em>&nbsp;<em>and</em>&nbsp;<em>Tokyo</em>&nbsp;<em>tribunals</em>&nbsp;<em>were</em>&nbsp;<em>set</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>ad-hoc</em>&nbsp;<em>by</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>Allies,</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>victors</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>World</em>&nbsp;<em>War</em>&nbsp;<em>II</em>&nbsp;<em>to</em>&nbsp;<em>try</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>principals</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>loosing</em>&nbsp;<em>axis</em>&nbsp;<em>power.</em>&nbsp;<em>While</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>Nuremberg</em>&nbsp;<em>was</em>&nbsp;<em>regarded</em>&nbsp;<em>as</em>&nbsp;<em>more</em>&nbsp;<em>successful</em>&nbsp;<em>and</em>&nbsp;<em>significant</em>&nbsp;<em>than</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>Tokyo</em>&nbsp;<em>tribunal.</em>&nbsp;<em>During</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>years</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>cold</em>&nbsp;<em>war,</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>idea</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>future</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>International</em>&nbsp;<em>Criminal</em>&nbsp;<em>Court</em>&nbsp;<em>largely</em>&nbsp;<em>occupied</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>back</em>&nbsp;<em>burner</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>International</em>&nbsp;<em>affairs.</em>&nbsp;<em>With</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>fall</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>Soviet</em>&nbsp;<em>Union</em>&nbsp;<em>in</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>early</em>&nbsp;<em>1990’s</em>&nbsp;<em>various</em>&nbsp;<em>tribunal</em>&nbsp;<em>and</em>&nbsp;<em>international</em>&nbsp;<em>conflicts</em>&nbsp;<em>broke</em>&nbsp;<em>out</em>&nbsp;<em>in</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>world.</em>&nbsp;<em>Most</em>&nbsp;<em>notably,</em>&nbsp;<em>after</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>break-up</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>former</em>&nbsp;<em>Yugoslavia</em>&nbsp;<em>and</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>modern</em>&nbsp;<em>Balkan</em>&nbsp;<em>wars,</em>&nbsp;<em>it</em>&nbsp;<em>was</em>&nbsp;<em>clear</em>&nbsp;<em>war</em>&nbsp;<em>crime,</em>&nbsp;<em>genocide</em>&nbsp;<em>and</em>&nbsp;<em>crimes</em>&nbsp;<em>against</em>&nbsp;<em>humanity</em>&nbsp;<em>were</em>&nbsp;<em>occurring</em>&nbsp;<em>on</em>&nbsp;<em>a</em>&nbsp;<em>mass</em>&nbsp;<em>scale.</em>&nbsp;<em>Similarly,</em>&nbsp;<em>tribal</em>&nbsp;<em>warfare</em>&nbsp;<em>between</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>Hutus</em>&nbsp;<em>and</em>&nbsp;<em>Tutsis</em>&nbsp;<em>in</em>&nbsp;<em>several</em>&nbsp;<em>African</em>&nbsp;<em>countries</em>&nbsp;<em>including</em>&nbsp;<em>Rwanda</em>&nbsp;<em>and</em>&nbsp;<em>Burundi</em>&nbsp;<em>lead</em>&nbsp;<em>to</em>&nbsp;<em>enormous</em>&nbsp;<em>human</em>&nbsp;<em>right</em>&nbsp;<em>abuses.</em>&nbsp;<em>The</em>&nbsp;<em>United</em>&nbsp;<em>Nations</em>&nbsp;<em>Security</em>&nbsp;<em>Council</em>&nbsp;<em>established</em>&nbsp;<em>ad-hoc</em>&nbsp;<em>tribunals</em>&nbsp;<em>to</em>&nbsp;<em>address</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>international</em>&nbsp;<em>crimes</em>&nbsp;<em>arising</em>&nbsp;<em>from</em>&nbsp;<em>those</em>&nbsp;<em>crises,</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>tribunals</em>&nbsp;<em>were</em>&nbsp;<em>set</em>&nbsp;<em>u</em> <br></p>

Project Overview

<p> </p><div><p><strong>INTRODUCTION</strong></p><p>In 1945, two monumental tribunals arose out of the ashes of World War II.</p><p>The International Military Tribunals at Nuremberg, Germany and Tokyo, Japan.</p><p>Both were established by the victorious nations of the World War II, in order to</p><p>provide swift justice for the victims of atrocities and punishment for the</p><p>perpetrators.</p><p>In the decades after the war, several adhoc tribunals were established to</p><p>deal with various states sponsored crimes, including those tribunals set up in</p><p>Bosnia and Rwanda in the 1990s. An all encompassing tool of Justice, though</p><p>had yet to be organized.</p><p>The 1998 meeting of nations in Rome however addressed the wide spread</p><p>desire for international justice by creating the International Criminal Court (ICC).</p><p>The ICC was constructed by the United Nations to be a permanent, non-partisan</p><p>judicial instrument to promote the Rule of Law and ensure that gravest crimes do</p><p>not go unpunished.</p><p>Those “grave crimes” include genocide, crimes against humanity; war</p><p>crimes and the crimes of aggression. The court officially became operational on</p><p>July, 1, 2002 in Hague, Netherlands.</p><p>The entry into force of the ICC statute has enabled the court to exercise</p><p>jurisdiction to try individuals accused of war crimes, crimes against humanity and</p><p>genocide. The court has jurisdiction over crimes committed by individuals who</p><p>1</p></div><div><p>are nationals of states which have ratified its statute, or who have committed</p><p>crimes on the territory of such states. Those conditions are not applicable when a</p><p>case is referred to the court by the United Nations security council.</p><p>In addition, the court can only act when the relevant state is unable or</p><p>unwilling to carry out investigation or prosecutions.</p><p>The ICC is a permanent court with potentially universal and over half of the</p><p>states have so far ratified its statute. Although the U.S initially started an active</p><p>anti-ICC campaign, its opposition has recently lessened since its strategy to</p><p>undermine the court has proven to be ineffective and its fears have prove to be</p><p>unfounded.</p><p>The ICC would not undermine the sovereignty of nations because it would</p><p>function only where states are unable or unwilling to.</p><p>The imperatives of International Criminal Tribunal, A case study of Crimes</p><p>of genocide, deal with the historical evolution of this important branch of Public</p><p>International Law. It is the aim of this research work to critically analyse and</p><p>appraise the contribution of international community to the development of world</p><p>peace. Over the years from antiquity, to the modern times, rules, regulations,</p><p>protocol and conventions were evolved which govern the contract of hostilities in</p><p>both international and non-international conflicts.</p><p>The world has witnessed some of the most gruesome attacks on humanity</p><p>by totalitarian and authoritarian regimes leading to the murder of innocent people</p><p>to such alarming proposition that the international community could not ignore.</p><p>2</p></div><div><p>Global response to the United Nations to make genocide on international crime</p><p>and bring its perpetrator to justice. These efforts culminated in the United Nations</p><p>Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of genocide in 1948.</p><p>And the event in former Yugoslavia and Rwanda which led to the</p><p>destruction of thousands of innocent lives further strengthened the need for an</p><p>International Criminal Court, which had long been under consideration. And with</p><p>the adoption of the Rome Statute of International Criminal Court, International</p><p>community took major steps towards ending the culture of impunity that has so</p><p>often prevailed in our world.</p><p>“<em>In</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>prospect</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>an</em>&nbsp;<em>International</em>&nbsp;<em>Criminal</em>&nbsp;<em>Court</em>&nbsp;<em>lies</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>promise</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>universal</em>&nbsp;<em>justice.</em>&nbsp;<em>That</em>&nbsp;<em>is</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>simple</em>&nbsp;<em>soaring</em>&nbsp;<em>hope</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>this</em>&nbsp;<em>vision,</em>&nbsp;<em>we</em>&nbsp;<em>are</em>&nbsp;<em>close</em>&nbsp;<em>to</em>&nbsp;<em>its</em>&nbsp;<em>realization</em>&nbsp;<em>and</em>&nbsp;<em>we</em>&nbsp;<em>will</em>&nbsp;<em>do</em>&nbsp;<em>our</em>&nbsp;<em>part</em>&nbsp;<em>to</em>&nbsp;<em>see</em>&nbsp;<em>it</em>&nbsp;<em>through</em>&nbsp;<em>till</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>end.</em>&nbsp;<em>We</em>&nbsp;<em>ask</em>&nbsp;<em>you</em>&nbsp;<em>to</em>&nbsp;<em>do</em>&nbsp;<em>yours</em>&nbsp;<em>in</em>&nbsp;<em>our</em>&nbsp;<em>struggle</em>&nbsp;<em>to</em>&nbsp;<em>ensure</em>&nbsp;<em>that</em>&nbsp;<em>no</em>&nbsp;<em>ruler,</em>&nbsp;<em>no</em>&nbsp;<em>state,</em>&nbsp;<em>no</em>&nbsp;<em>junta</em>&nbsp;<em>and</em>&nbsp;<em>no</em>&nbsp;<em>army</em>&nbsp;<em>anywhere</em>&nbsp;<em>can</em>&nbsp;<em>abuse</em>&nbsp;<em>human</em>&nbsp;<em>right</em>&nbsp;<em>with</em>&nbsp;<em>impunity.</em>&nbsp;<em>Only</em>&nbsp;<em>then</em>&nbsp;<em>will</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>innocent</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>distant</em>&nbsp;<em>wars</em>&nbsp;<em>and</em>&nbsp;<em>conflicts</em>&nbsp;<em>know</em>&nbsp;<em>that</em>&nbsp;<em>they</em>&nbsp;<em>may</em>&nbsp;<em>sleep</em>&nbsp;<em>under</em>&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;<em>cover</em>&nbsp;<em>of</em>&nbsp;<em>justice;</em>&nbsp;<em>that</em>&nbsp;<em>they</em>&nbsp;<em>too</em>&nbsp;<em>have</em>&nbsp;<em>rights</em>&nbsp;<em>and</em>&nbsp;<em>that</em>&nbsp;<em>those</em>&nbsp;<em>who</em>&nbsp;<em>violate</em>&nbsp;<em>that</em>&nbsp;<em>rights</em>&nbsp;<em>will</em>&nbsp;<em>be</em>&nbsp;<em>punished”.</em></p><p>The words of the former United Nations Secretary-General, quoted above,</p><p>aptly demonstrated global view with concern on the negative. It also indicates</p><p>the direction of international community wants or intends to go in the quest to</p><p>curb incidences of genocide around the world.1</p><p>1 Kofi Anan, <em>Former</em>&nbsp;<em>United</em>&nbsp;<em>Nations</em>&nbsp;<em>Secretary</em>&nbsp;<em>General.</em>&nbsp;Available at <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.un.org/law/icc/general/overview.htm">http://www.un.org/law/icc/general/overview.htm</a> 16th November, 2010</p><p>3</p></div><div><p>The history of mankind is the story of power struggle, confrontations and</p><p>armed conflict between nations, people and individuals. From earliest times, men</p><p>have been pre-occupied with the problem of how to control the effect of violence</p><p>and its attendant human sufferings with varying degrees of success.</p><p>For example, prior to the middle of the 19th Century, agreements to protect</p><p>victims of wars were of more transient character, binding only, upon the</p><p>contracting parties thereto and based upon strict reciprocity. In reality, they</p><p>constituted purely military agreement usually effectively only for the duration of a</p><p>particular period of hostility. This state of affairs was changed by the birth of</p><p>modern law.</p><p>The general assembly in 1995 session therefore decided to convene a</p><p>preparatory &nbsp; &nbsp; committee &nbsp; &nbsp; of &nbsp; &nbsp; member &nbsp; &nbsp; states; &nbsp; &nbsp; non &nbsp; &nbsp; governmental &nbsp; &nbsp; and</p><p>intergovernmental statutes in light of the myriad of amendment to ILC drafts as at</p></div> <br><p></p>

Blazingprojects Mobile App

📚 Over 50,000 Project Materials
📱 100% Offline: No internet needed
📝 Over 98 Departments
🔍 Software coding and Machine construction
🎓 Postgraduate/Undergraduate Research works
📥 Instant Whatsapp/Email Delivery

Blazingprojects App

Related Research

Law. 2 min read

Impact of Digital Evidence admissibility standards on criminal trials in the 21st ce...

What This Project Is About A plain-language overview of how courts decide if digital evidence like emails, chats, or metadata can be used in criminal trials, an...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 2 min read

Blockchain-based regulatory sandboxes: A comparative study of their legal frameworks...

What This Project Is About A plain-language overview of the topic and what the project investigates. The Problem It Addresses What problem or gap this project ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 3 min read

Assessing the Effectiveness of International Humanitarian Law in Addressing Cyber Wa...

What This Project Is About This project looks at how laws designed to protect people in war apply to cyber attacks, and whether those laws cover online harms we...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 2 min read

A Comparative Analysis of Digital Evidence Admissibility in E-Court Proceedings: Cha...

What This Project Is About A plain-language overview of the topic and what the project investigates. The Problem It Addresses What problem or gap this project ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 2 min read

Impact of Digital Evidence Legislation on Privacy Rights in Cross-Border Cybercrime ...

What This Project Is About A plain-language overview of the topic and what the project investigates. The Problem It Addresses What problem or gap this project ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 2 min read

Impact of digital surveillance laws on privacy rights in the era of AI-driven govern...

What This Project Is About A plain-language overview of how laws regulate digital surveillance and how those rules affect privacy when AI systems collect and an...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 3 min read

Assessing the Efficacy of Digital Evidence Admissibility Standards in Criminal Trial...

What This Project Is About The project examines how courts decide whether digital evidence can be used in criminal trials across common law countries. It looks ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 4 min read

Promoting access to justice through technology: Evaluating the impact of online disp...

What This Project Is About A plain-language overview of how technology can help people solve consumer disputes more easily. The project looks at online dispute ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 4 min read

Impact of Digital Evidence admissibility standards on criminal prosecutions in [Your...

What This Project Is About A plain-language overview of the topic and what the project investigates. The Problem It Addresses What problem or gap this project ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
WhatsApp Click here to chat with us