Justification for and the abolition of capital punishment under human rights law

 

Table Of Contents


  • <p> </p><p>CERTIFICATION PAGE</p><p>ABSTRACT</p><p>TABLE OF CONTENTS</p><p>DEDICATION</p><p>ACKNOWLEDGMENT</p><p>TABLE Of CASES</p><p>TABLE OF STATUTES</p><p>LIST OF ABBREVIATION</p><p>

Chapter ONE

INTRODUCTION

  • </p><p>GENERAL INTRODUCTION</p><p>1.0.0: INTRODUCTION</p><p>1.1.0: OBJECTIVES OF STUDY</p><p>1.2.0: SCOPE OF STUDY</p><p>1.3.0: METHODOLOGY</p><p>1.4.0: LITERATURE REVIEW</p><p>1.5.0: DEFINITION OF TERMS</p><p>1.6.0: CONCLUSION</p><p>

Chapter TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

  • </p><p>CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND HUMAN RIGHT LAW</p><p>2.0.0: INTRODUCTION</p><p>2.1.0PUNISHMENT</p><p>2.1.1FORMS OF PUNISHMENT</p><p>2.1.2COMPENSATION</p><p>2.1.3INCARCERATION</p><p>2.1.4CORPORAL PUNISHMENT</p><p>2.1.5BANISHMENT</p><p>2.1.6CAPITAL PUNISHMENT</p><p>2.1.7OTHER APPROACHES</p><p>2.2.0: HISTORICAL FRAMEWORK OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT</p><p>2.2.1: MODES OF EXECUTION</p><p>2.2.2CRUCIFIXION</p><p>2.2.3STONING</p><p>2.2.4HANGING</p><p>2.2.5: SHOOTING OR FIRING SQUAD</p><p>2.2.6: GAS CHAMBER OR LETHAL GAS MODE OF EXECUTION</p><p>2.2.7: ELECTROCUTION</p><p>2.3.0: WORLD WIDE ANALYSIS OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT</p><p>2.4.0: HISTORY OF HUMAN RIGHTS</p><p>2.5.0: CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND RIGHT TO LIFE</p><p>2.6.0: CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND RIGHT TO HUMAN DIGNITY</p><p>2.7.0: CONCLUSION</p><p>

Chapter THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  • </p><p>JUSTIFICATIONS FOR CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND ITS ABOLITION</p><p>3.0.0: INTRODUCTION</p><p>3.1.0: JUSTIFICATIONS FOR CAPITAL PUNISHMENT</p><p>3.1.1JUST PUNISHMENT</p><p>3.1.2DETERRENCE</p><p>3.1.3INCAPACITATION</p><p>3.2.0ABOLITION OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT</p><p>3.2.1PROPENSITY TO CONDEMN INNOCENT DEFENDANTS</p><p>3.2.2DISCRIMINATLY APPLICATION ON THE BASIS OF RACE</p><p>3.2.3ARBITRARY APPLICATION AGAINST THE POOR</p><p>3.
  • 2.4COMPARING COST TO BENEFITS</p><p>3.3.0FLAWS IN ARGUMENTS FOR ABOLITION</p><p>3.3.1RACIAL BIAS</p><p>3.3.2RISK TO THE INNOCENT</p><p>3.4.0FLAWS IN THE ARGUMENTS FOR CAPITAL PUNISHMENT</p><p>3.4.1CONCLUSION</p><p>

Chapter FOUR

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS

  • </p><p>A COMPARISON OF THE NIGERIAN CAPITAL PUNISHMENT TO THAT OF OTHER SELECTED COUNTRIES</p><p>4.0.0: INTRODUCTION</p><p>4.
  • 1.0THE NIGERIAN AND U.S.A CAPITAL PUNISHMENT COMPARED</p><p>4.
  • 2.0THE NIGERIAN AND AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL PUNISHMENT COMPARED</p><p>4.3.0NIGERIAN AND SOUTH AFRICAN CAPITAL PUNISHMENT COMPARED</p><p>4.4.0: CONCLUSION</p><p>

Chapter FIVE

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

  • </p><p>CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS</p><p>5.0.0: CONCLUSION</p><p>5.
  • 1.0RECOMMENDATIONS</p><p>BIBLIOGRAPHY</p><p>ARTICLES IN JOURNALS</p><p>ARTICLES ON THE INTERNET</p><p>BOOKS</p><p>CHAPTERS IN BOOKS</p> <br><p></p>

Project Abstract

<p> </p><p>The legal infliction of death as a penalty for violating criminal law has been in existence from time immemorial, people have been put to death for various forms of wrong doings and methods of execution have included crucifixion, stoning, drowning, burning at stake, impaling and beheading. Today capital punishment is typically accomplished by lethal gas or injection, electrocution, hanging or shooting.</p><p>The human right proponents see death penalties as a violation of the right to life and human dignity as such countries that are becoming more democratic are eager to abolish it. The trend in most industrialized nations has been to first stop executing prisoners and then substitute long terms of imprisonment for death as the most severe of criminal penalties, about 90 nation have abolished death penalties and an almost equal number of nations, (most of which are developing countries in which Nigeria is included) have retained it</p><p>This thesis considers the argument for and against death penalty in relation to human rights, the argument against this concept goes beyond the Human Right Parlance, as there are other arguments like; the propensity to condemn and execute innocent citizens, the non-deterrent effect of capital punishment, the arbitrary use of the concept against the poor, the discriminately application of the concept on the basis of race, and the lesser argument that proclaims that capital punishment is cruel and inhuman. All these argument have not been reckoned with by anti-abolitionist, as some of them have come up with other modes of executions that they believe are more humane and less cruel, the sole aim of this is to kill the argument of cruel and inhuman treatment</p><p>The retributive nature of the human race would rather love that a murderer be necessarily paid back in His own coin, this is believed to be the anti-abolitionist main reason for insisting on the retention of death penalty. If the cost of executing an innocent person and abolishing the concept of death penalty is compared, it would be discovered that, it is more beneficial to abolish the use of death penalty than to lose valuable citizens to wrongful executions. Moreover, countries that have substituted life sentence for death penalty are not worse off than countries that have retained it.</p> <br><p></p>

Project Overview

Blazingprojects Mobile App

πŸ“š Over 50,000 Project Materials
πŸ“± 100% Offline: No internet needed
πŸ“ Over 98 Departments
πŸ” Software coding and Machine construction
πŸŽ“ Postgraduate/Undergraduate Research works
πŸ“₯ Instant Whatsapp/Email Delivery

Blazingprojects App

Related Research

Law. 2 min read

Legal Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Intellectual Property Rights...

What This Project Is About This project explores how artificial intelligence (AI) affects laws related to intellectual property (IP). Intellectual property incl...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 4 min read

Legal Implications of Digital Privacy Laws in E-Commerce Transactions...

What This Project Is About This project explores how laws designed to protect digital privacy affect online buying and selling (e-commerce). It looks at what ri...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 4 min read

The Impact of Digital Surveillance Laws on Privacy Rights in the 21st Century...

What This Project Is About This project looks at the laws that regulate digital surveillance β€” the way governments and companies monitor people's online activ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 4 min read

The Impact of Digital Privacy Laws on Data Protection in E-Commerce...

This project looks at how digital privacy laws affect the way online businesses protect people's personal information. In today’s world, many people shop onli...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 2 min read

Legal Digital Identity and Privacy Protection in the Era of Blockchain Technologies...

This project explores how digital identity, which means a person's online identity or how they prove who they are on the internet, can be managed legally throug...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 3 min read

The Impact of Digital Evidence in Modern Criminal Proceedings...

This project looks at how digital evidence is changing the way criminal cases are handled in court. Digital evidence refers to information stored electronically...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 3 min read

The Impact of Digital Surveillance Laws on Privacy Rights in the Digital Age...

This project is all about understanding how laws that regulate digital surveillance affect people's rights to privacy. Digital surveillance refers to the monito...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 3 min read

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Legal Research and Case Analysis in the Dig...

Overview: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology in various sectors has significantly transformed the way tasks are performed, enabling eff...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 2 min read

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Legal Practice: Challenges and Opportunitie...

The rapid advancement and integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have significantly transformed various industries, and the legal sector is no...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
WhatsApp Click here to chat with us