Impact of the judicial interpretation of repugnancy doctrine on the customary laws and customary practices in nigeria
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Evolution of Customary Laws in Nigeria
- 2.2Repugnancy Doctrine in Customary Laws
- 2.3Judicial Interpretation of Repugnancy Doctrine
- 2.4Impact of Judicial Interpretation on Customary Laws
- 2.5Case Studies on Repugnancy Doctrine
- 2.6International Perspectives on Customary Laws
- 2.7Critiques on the Repugnancy Doctrine
- 2.8Comparative Analysis with Common Law
- 2.9Influence of Colonial Legacy on Customary Laws
- 2.10Contemporary Issues in Customary Law
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design
- 3.2Data Collection Methods
- 3.3Sampling Techniques
- 3.4Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.5Ethical Considerations
- 3.6Research Variables
- 3.7Research Assumptions
- 3.8Limitations of the Methodology
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Judicial Interpretations
- 4.3Implications for Customary Practices
- 4.4Influence on Legal Framework
- 4.5Socio-Cultural Impact
- 4.6Policy Recommendations
- 4.7Future Research Directions
- 4.8Comparative Studies
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Recommendations
- 5.4Contributions to Knowledge
- 5.5Implications for Policy and Practice
- 5.6Reflection on Research Process
- 5.7Areas for Further Research
- 5.8Conclusion Statement
Project Abstract
<p> </p><p>The introduction of the British Common Law, the Doctrine of Equity and the Statute of General Application by <strong>Ordinance 3 of 1863 </strong>into Nigeria did not abolish the customary law of the people. Rather, the statute introducing such English Laws expressly made provision to the effect that British established courts in Nigeria should observe and enforce the observance of the Customary Law of the people.</p><p>However, it is instructive to state that <strong>Ordinance 4 of 1876</strong> provided for the preservation of such customary laws in clear and unambiguous terms. <strong>Section 18 of Ordinance 4 of 1876 </strong> enjoined the British established courts in the colony to enforce the observance of the customary laws of the people of the colony.</p><p>Subsequent local legislations over the years have since continued to retain these legislation. In essence, every High Court in each of the twenty one jurisdictions in the country is enjoined to observe and enforce the customary law of the people in its area of jurisdiction.</p><p>In the light of the above, there are however, three pre-requisites to be fulfilled before the court can observe and enforce any customary law and these are</p><p>the customary law must not be repugnant to natural justice equity and good conscience,and that such customary law must not be incompatible either directly or by implication with any law for the time being in force, or Contrary to public policy.</p><p>The pre-occupation of the research is a protruding insight into the meaning of the doctrine and its applicability in Nigeria. Of note is its applicability and relevance on our socio-cultural environment.</p><p>The trend of discussions in this work is to enquire into the origin of the doctrine, the purpose and limit of law, nature and classification of customary laws and the basic statutory provisions such as <strong>Section 14(3) of the Evidence Act </strong>and<strong> Section 15 of the High Court Law of Akwa Ibom State </strong>1 which contains the repugnancy and public policy test. Finally we will carefully examine the judicial approach and the implication of this approach to our legal and socio-political.</p> <br><p></p>
Project Overview