Antitrypanosomal activities of acacia nilotica and khaya senegalensis and the haematological profile of trypanosoma brucei brucei infected wistar rats
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Antitrypanosomal Activities
- 2.2Acacia Nilotica: Properties and Benefits
- 2.3Khaya Senegalensis: Properties and Benefits
- 2.4Trypanosoma Brucei Brucei: Characteristics and Effects
- 2.5Previous Studies on Antitrypanosomal Activities
- 2.6Mechanisms of Action of Acacia Nilotica and Khaya Senegalensis
- 2.7Comparative Analysis of Acacia Nilotica and Khaya Senegalensis
- 2.8Effects of Trypanosoma Brucei Brucei Infection on Wistar Rats
- 2.9Relationship Between Herbal Extracts and Haematological Profile
- 2.10Summary of Literature Review
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Methodology Overview
- 3.2Selection of Herbal Extracts
- 3.3Animal Model and Infection Protocol
- 3.4Administration of Acacia Nilotica and Khaya Senegalensis
- 3.5Blood Collection and Haematological Analysis
- 3.6Data Collection Methods
- 3.7Statistical Analysis Plan
- 3.8Ethical Considerations and Animal Welfare
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Analysis of Haematological Profile in Infected Rats
- 4.2Effects of Acacia Nilotica on Parasite Load
- 4.3Effects of Khaya Senegalensis on Parasite Load
- 4.4Comparison of Herbal Extracts on Trypanosoma Brucei Brucei
- 4.5Changes in Rats' Health Parameters post-Treatment
- 4.6Discussion on Findings in Relation to Previous Studies
- 4.7Implications of Results on Antitrypanosomal Research
- 4.8Recommendations for Future Research
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Conclusion and Summary of Research
- 5.2Recap of Study Objectives and Findings
- 5.3Contributions to Antitrypanosomal Knowledge
- 5.4Practical Applications and Future Considerations
- 5.5Final Thoughts and Closing Remarks
Project Abstract
<p> This study was aimed at investigating antitrypanosomal activities and haematological profile of crude extract and fractions of the stem bark of <em>Acacia nilotica</em> and <em>Khaya senegalensis</em> plants against <em>Trypanosoma brucei brucei</em> infected Wistar rats with a view to determining the phytochemical constituents and LD50 of <em>Acacia nilotica</em> and <em>Khaya senegalensis</em>, antitrypanosomal activities of crude extract of <em>Acacia nilotica</em> and <em>Khaya senegalensis</em> against <em>Trypanosoma brucei brucei</em> infected Wistar rats, antitrypanosomal activities of the plant fractions administered to <em>Trypanosoma brucei brucei</em> infected Wistar rats and haematological profile of <em>Trypanosoma brucei brucei</em> infected Wistar rats, before and after administration of crude extract and fractions. The phytochemical constituents and toxicity of the stem bark of both plants were determined by the standard method and the LD50respectively. The methanolic extracts and fractions of the plants was administered to the Wistar rats intraperitoneally daily and the parasitaemia count was determined using the rapid matching method. PCV, WBC and differential counts were determined before and after the administration to ascertain any significant differences. The phytochemical constituents of the stem barks of <em>Acacia nilotica</em> and <em>Khaya senegalensis</em> crude extracts and fractions revealed the following secondary metabolites; Alkaloids, tannins, glycosides, cardiac glycosides, saponins, triterpene, carbohydrates and flavonoids. The LD50 for the crude extract of the stem bark of Acacia nilotica was 707.1mg/kg body weight while the LD50 for the fractions (N-hexane, ethyl acetate and N-butane) was 547.7 mg/kg, 387.3 mg/kg and 707.1 mg/kg body weight respectively. The LD50 for the crude extract of the stem bark of <em>Khaya senegalensis</em> was 547.7mg/kg body weight while the LD50 for the fractions (N-hexane, ethyl acetate and N-butane) was 387.3 mg/kg, 547.7 mg/kg and 223.6 mg/kg body weight respectively. The stem barks of <em>Acacia nilotica</em> and <em>Khaya senegalensis</em> crude extracts (100, 200, 300 and 400mg/kg body weight) and fractions (50, 100, 150 and 200mg/kg body weight) had <br></p>
Project Overview