ANALYSIS OF THE MEANS OF PROOF IN CIVIL LITIGATION UNDER ISLAMIC LAW
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Civil Litigation
- 2.2Historical Development of Islamic Law
- 2.3Principles of Evidence in Islamic Law
- 2.4Types of Evidence in Islamic Law
- 2.5Comparison with Common Law Systems
- 2.6Challenges in Proof in Islamic Civil Litigation
- 2.7Importance of Witness Testimonies
- 2.8Expert Evidence in Islamic Law
- 2.9Documentary Evidence in Islamic Law
- 2.10Recent Trends in Civil Litigation under Islamic Law
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Methodology Overview
- 3.2Research Design
- 3.3Data Collection Methods
- 3.4Sampling Techniques
- 3.5Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.6Ethical Considerations
- 3.7Limitations of the Methodology
- 3.8Validation of Findings
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Analysis of Research Findings
- 4.2Interpretation of Data
- 4.3Discussion of Results
- 4.4Comparison with Existing Literature
- 4.5Implications for Civil Litigation Practice
- 4.6Recommendations for Future Research
- 4.7Practical Applications of Findings
- 4.8Conclusions Drawn from the Analysis
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Research
- 5.2Conclusions
- 5.3Contributions to Knowledge
- 5.4Practical Implications
- 5.5Recommendations for Practice
- 5.6Areas for Future Research
- 5.7Final Thoughts
Project Abstract
This dissertation entitled "A Critical Analysis of the Means of Proof in Civil Litigation under Islamic law "primarily examined the principles of Islamic Law applicable to means of proof. In this regard, the essential means of proof have been highlighted, i.e., Shahadah (testimony), al-Iqrar (Confession/Admission), Qarinah (circumstantial evidence), al-Kitabah (documentary evidence), flm al-Qadi (personal knowledge of a judge), al-Yamin (oath), al-Qiyafah (forecast), al-Khabar (Information). The study is predicated upon the research problem that while under Islamic law litigants are under an obligation to furnish proof in order to succeed in the prosecutions of their cases; and consequently, while the courts are also obliged to adjudicate on the basis of the strength of the proof presented before them, it is imperative that the particular means of proof recognized by Islamic law are brought to lime line and critically examined as to its utility in the adjudication of disputes before the courts. Therefore, this dissertation primarily examines various means of proof in civil litigation under Islamic law and their efficacy in the administration of justice under the sharia. The dissertation adopts mainly doctrinal method of research. It is principally observed that Islamic law makes it mandatory on Muslims to promote the cause of justice by obliging litigants to produce proof in support of their claims before judgment could be made in their favour and that anyone who is in possession of any piece of evidence is obliged to furnish it in order to uphold the cause of justice and secure the restoration of the legitimate rights of the people. Thus, the law accords ample means and standard of proof to different categories of matters in order that the ends of justice are attained. It is thereby recommended that Islamic law of evidence as interpreted by different schools of thought should be strictly adhered to by our judges in deciding disputes before the sharia courts in Nigeria and that the Sharia implementing states, through their Ministries of Justice and the Judiciaries, should intensify efforts in training their sharia judges in institutions of higher learning, for the effective performance and implementation of the shariah legal system in our states.
Project Overview