AN APPRAISAL OF THE DOCTRINE OF NON-INTERVENTION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW

 

Table Of Contents


  • Declaration………………………………………………………………………………………………….. i Certification…………………………………………………………………………………………………. i Dedication……………………………………………………………………………………………………. iii Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………………… iv Abstracts……………………………………………………………………………………………………. vi Tables of Cases………………………………………………………………………………………….. vii Tables of Statutes ……………………………………………………………….. viii List of Journals……………………………………………………………………………………………. x Abbreviations…………………………………………………………………………………………….. xi Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………………………. xii

Chapter ONE

INTRODUCTION

  • GENERAL INTRODUCTION
  • 1.1Background of the Study………………………………………… 1
  • 1.2Statement of the Problem ………………………………………………………………….. 3
  • 1.3Aims and objectives of the Study………………………………………………………… 5
  • 1.4Scope of the Study…………………………………………………………………… 5
  • 1.5Literature Review……………………………………………………………………………….. 5
  • 1.6Justification ……………………………………………….. 11
  • 1.7Methodology ……………………………………………………… 12
  • 1.8Organisational Layout…………………………………………………………………………. 13

Chapter TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

  • THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRINCIPLE OF NONINTERVENTION
  • 2.1Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. 15 2.
  • 1.1Meaning of Non-Intervention…………………………………………………………………. 16 2.
  • 1.2Historical Development of the Principle of Non-intervention ……………………… 17
  • 2.2Sources of the Law of Non-intervention………………………………………………….. 25 2.
  • 2.1United Nations Charter…………………………………………………………………………. 25 2.
  • 2.2United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2131………………………………….. 26 2.
  • 2.3United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2625…………………………………. 28 2.
  • 2.4Case Law…………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 2.
  • 2.5Customary International Law…………………………………………………………………. 30 2.
  • 2.6Opinio Juris …………………………………………………………………………………….. 30 2.
  • 3.The Interpretation of Domestic Jurisdiction……………………………………………… 30 2.
  • 3.2Some Reasons for Intervention……………………………………………………………… 31 2.
  • 4.The Idea of Sovereignty of State…………………………………………………………… 32 2.
  • 4.2The Concept of Sovereignty…………………………………………………………………. 33 2.
  • 4.3Non-Intervention and The Doctrine of Sovereignty…………………………………. 35 2.
  • 4.4The Concept of Sovereignty and Contemporary World………………………… 38
  • 2.5Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………. 43

Chapter THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  • THE MODERN CONCEPT OF THE PRINCIPLE OF NONINTERVENTION
  • 3.1Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….. 45
  • 3.2The Modern Concept of Intervention…………………………………………………… 48 3.
  • 2.1Political Pressure……………………………………………………………………. 48 3.
  • 2.2Economic Pressure………………………………………………………………………… 52 3.
  • 2.3Democratic Revolution…………………………………………………………………….. 56 3.
  • 2.4Humanitarian Assistance………………………………………………………………….. 59 3.
  • 2.5Ideological or Moral Value…………………………………………………………………. 62 3.
  • 2.6Supply of Funds………………………………………………………………………………. 65 3.
  • 2.7Provision of Statistics and Logistics……………………………………………………. 67 3.
  • 2.8Economic Sanctions……………………………………………………………………….. 68 3.
  • 2.9Intervention to Assist Modernization………………………………………………….. 70
  • 3.3Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………. 73

Chapter FOUR

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS

  • EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE OF NON-INTERVENTION
  • 4.1Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………… 74
  • 4.2Prohibition of Intervention………………………………………………………………………. 77
  • 4.3Anticipatory Self-Defence……………………………………………………………………… 79
  • 4.4Intervention through Authorization of the UN General Assembly……………….. 84 4.
  • 5.Claims to other Exceptions………………………………………………………………….. 90 4.
  • 5.1Intervention for the Protection of the lives and Property of Nationals………… 91 4.
  • 5.2Intervention by Request……………………………………………………………………….. 100 4.
  • 5.3Humanitarian Intervention…………………………………………………………………… 102 (a) Indian Intervention in Pakistan, 1971………………………………………………………104 (b) Tanzania Intervention in Uganda, 1979……………………………………………….. 105 (c) Vietnamese Intervention in Cambodia…………………………………………………… 106 (d) Allied Forces Intervention in Iraq, 1991………………………………………………… 106 Intervention in Central African Republic 2013…………………………………111 4.5.
  • 3.1Comment………………………………………………………………………………………… 112 4.
  • 5.4Intervention to Enforce Provision of a Treaty………………………………………… 115 4.5.
  • 4.1The Turkish Intervention in Cyprus, 1974…………………………………………….. 115 4.
  • 5.5Intervention in support of Democracy (Reagan Doctrine)………………………. 117 4.
  • 5.6Intervention/Non-intervention in the Post-Cold War Period……………………. 120 4.5.
  • 6.1(i) Intervention in Haiti and Liberia……………………………………………………… 120 4.
  • 5.7Intervention in the Fight Against Terrorism…………………………………………… 125
  • 4.6Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………….. 126

Chapter FIVE

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

  • CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • 5.1Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………. 128
  • 5.2Summary of the Principle of Non-Intervention……………………………………… 128
  • 5.3Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………………. 129
  • 5.4Recommendations…………………………………………………………………………….. 134
  • 6.0BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………………………………… 137

Project Abstract

Under the Charter of the United Nations, intervention is absolutely prohibited in matters that are purely domestic to states. However, notwithstanding this general rule of non-intervention, there are happenings that though purely internal to states, have the capability to threaten international peace and security. The United Nations Charter has recognized these happening as worthy justification for intervention. Examples are self defence and authorization by the UN Security Council. Other exceptions have been created under customary international law such as humanitarian intervention, etc However, within the last 69 years so many events have happened as a result of which the rule of nonintervention has been widely breached majority of which could be justified on grounds of economic, cultural, social and political imperatives. Therefore, the task of this thesis is to examine states practice as it affects the principle of non-intervention by creating diplomatic, political and economic problems throughout the globe. It is against this background that this research tries to analyse modern practice of states at international law to see that to what extent the principle of non-intervention has been abused. To achieve this, a doctrinal method of research was adopted. After analysing the principle of non-intervention, the research concludes that the principle is meant to protect and preserve the territorial integrity, political independence and sovereign equality of states. Consequently, all forms of illegal interventions constitute violation of the Charter of the UN. However, it is found that states still intervene illegally in many parts of the world. It is recommended that some coherence be brought in to the principle of nonintervention and the application of the exceptions to the principle be carefully defined.

Project Overview

Blazingprojects Mobile App

📚 Over 50,000 Project Materials
📱 100% Offline: No internet needed
📝 Over 98 Departments
🔍 Software coding and Machine construction
🎓 Postgraduate/Undergraduate Research works
📥 Instant Whatsapp/Email Delivery

Blazingprojects App

Related Research

Law. 4 min read

Impact of Digital Evidence admissibility standards on criminal trials in the 21st ce...

What This Project Is About A plain-language overview of how courts decide if digital evidence like emails, chats, or metadata can be used in criminal trials, an...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 3 min read

Blockchain-based regulatory sandboxes: A comparative study of their legal frameworks...

What This Project Is About A plain-language overview of the topic and what the project investigates. The Problem It Addresses What problem or gap this project ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 2 min read

Assessing the Effectiveness of International Humanitarian Law in Addressing Cyber Wa...

What This Project Is About This project looks at how laws designed to protect people in war apply to cyber attacks, and whether those laws cover online harms we...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 2 min read

A Comparative Analysis of Digital Evidence Admissibility in E-Court Proceedings: Cha...

What This Project Is About A plain-language overview of the topic and what the project investigates. The Problem It Addresses What problem or gap this project ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 2 min read

Impact of Digital Evidence Legislation on Privacy Rights in Cross-Border Cybercrime ...

What This Project Is About A plain-language overview of the topic and what the project investigates. The Problem It Addresses What problem or gap this project ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 2 min read

Impact of digital surveillance laws on privacy rights in the era of AI-driven govern...

What This Project Is About A plain-language overview of how laws regulate digital surveillance and how those rules affect privacy when AI systems collect and an...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 2 min read

Assessing the Efficacy of Digital Evidence Admissibility Standards in Criminal Trial...

What This Project Is About The project examines how courts decide whether digital evidence can be used in criminal trials across common law countries. It looks ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 4 min read

Promoting access to justice through technology: Evaluating the impact of online disp...

What This Project Is About A plain-language overview of how technology can help people solve consumer disputes more easily. The project looks at online dispute ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
Law. 4 min read

Impact of Digital Evidence admissibility standards on criminal prosecutions in [Your...

What This Project Is About A plain-language overview of the topic and what the project investigates. The Problem It Addresses What problem or gap this project ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more →
WhatsApp Click here to chat with us