A critique of the powers of attorney general in the administration of criminal justice in nigeria
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Historical Overview of Attorney General's Role
- 2.2Legal Framework Governing Attorney General's Powers
- 2.3Theoretical Perspectives on Attorney General's Functions
- 2.4Comparative Analysis of Attorney General's Powers
- 2.5Challenges Faced by Attorney General in Criminal Justice Administration
- 2.6Impact of Attorney General's Decisions on Criminal Cases
- 2.7Public Perception of Attorney General's Role
- 2.8Accountability Mechanisms for Attorney General
- 2.9Ethical Considerations in Attorney General's Actions
- 2.10Future Trends in Attorney General's Powers
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design and Methodology
- 3.2Data Collection Methods
- 3.3Sampling Techniques
- 3.4Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.5Ethical Considerations in Research
- 3.6Validity and Reliability of Research Findings
- 3.7Research Limitations
- 3.8Research Challenges and Mitigation
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Research Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Attorney General's Powers in Criminal Cases
- 4.3Impact of Attorney General's Decisions on Justice System
- 4.4Comparison with International Standards
- 4.5Public Perception of Attorney General's Performance
- 4.6Recommendations for Improvement
- 4.7Implications for Policy and Practice
- 4.8Areas for Future Research
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusions Drawn from the Research
- 5.3Contributions to Knowledge
- 5.4Implications for Legal Practice
- 5.5Recommendations for Policy and Practice
- 5.6Reflections on the Research Process
- 5.7Limitations of the Study
- 5.8Suggestions for Future Research
Project Abstract
<p> </p><div><p>In the system of Administration of Justice in Nigeria, Attorney General occupies a very prominent position. As the Chief Law Officer and Minister for Justice, Attorney General exercises a controlling authority in the conduct of any civil proceeding affecting government or any of its agencies. For example, no garnishee order affecting public funds in the hand of any public functionary or any corporation or organization shall be executed without the prior consent of the Attorney General. In Criminal Cases, the Attorney General as the Chief Law prosecutor for the state, has power to institute and undertake, take over and continue or discontinue any criminal proceeding instituted by him or any other person or authority what so ever. In the exercise of the aforementioned powers, the Supreme Court of Nigeria had held that the Attorney General is a master unto himself, law unto himself, and is under no control β judicial or otherwise whatsoever. The exercise of his discretion in that regard is final and irreversible by even his appointer and is subject only to public condemnation in the court of public opinion. This dissertation however, questions the validity of the above position of the Supreme Court based on the general character of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), the historical development of the powers of Attorney General under the same Constitution, the NigeriaΓ’β¬ΕΈs local circumstances and the Rules of Interpretation of statute/ Constitutional provisions. The dissertation therefore, calls for the judicial restatement of the law and makes recommendations for the reform of the Constitution in such a manner that would ensure the redemption of the office of Attorney General from the exclusive control of the executives and curve political influence on the performance of his duties. The dissertation also questions the constitutionality of the requirement for the consent of Attorney General in the enforcement of garnishee orders against government or any of its agencies under S. 84(1 & 3) of the Sheriffs and Civil Process Act Cap.S6 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 and calls for the repeal of the same</p><p></p></div><h3></h3><br> <br><p></p>
Project Overview