Impact of torrefaction on the fuel properties of lignite, coconut shells, cassava peels and their blends
Table Of Contents
- <p> </p><p>TITLE PAGE – – – – – – – – – – -i<br>CERTIFICATION- – – – – – – – – – -ii<br>DEDICATION- – – – – – – – – – -iii<br>ACKNOWLEDGMENTS- – – – – – – – – – iv<br>TABLE OF CONTENTS- – – – – – – – – -v<br>LIST OF TABLES- – – – – – – – – – -xiii<br>LIST OF FIGURES- – – – – – – – – – – x<br>ABSTRACT- – – – – – – – – – – -xi<br>
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- <br>
- 1.1Coal- – – – – – – – – – – -1<br>
- 1.2Coal Formation- – – – – – – – – – -1<br>
- 1.3Coal Combustion- – – – – – – – – -3<br>
- 1.4Environmental Impacts of Coal- – – – – – – -3<br>
- 1.5Biomass- – – – – – – – – – – -4<br>
- 1.6Justification of the Study- – – – – – – – -5<br>
- 1.7Objectives of the Study- – – – – – – – – -6<br>
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- <br>7<br>
- 2.1Coal as a Source of Energy- – – – – – – – -7<br>
- 2.2Coal Classification- – – – – – – – – -7<br>
- 2.3Physical and Chemical Properties of Coal – – – – – -9<br>
- 2.4Analysis of Coal- – – – – – – – – -9<br>2.
- 4.1Scanning Electron Microscope– – – – – – – -10<br>
- 2.5Reliance on Coal- – – – – – – – – – -10<br>
- 2.6Lignite as a Source of Energy- – – – – – – – -11<br>2.
- 6.1Emissions from Lignite- – – – – – – – -13<br>2.
- 6.2Lignite Treatment- – – – – – – – – -14<br>
- 2.7Biomass as a Source of Energy- – – – – – – – -15<br>2.
- 7.1Air Pollution from Biomass- – – – – – – – -17<br>2.
- 7.2Biomass Energy density- – – – – – – – -18<br>
- 2.8Biomass Torrefaction- – – – – – – – – -18<br>2.
- 8.1Basic Principle of Torrefaction- – – – – – – -23<br>2.
- 8.2Advantages of Torrefaction- – – – – – – – -24<br>2.
- 8.3Applications of Torrefied Biomass- – – – – – – -25<br>
- 2.9Biomass Co-Firing- – – – – – – – – -26<br>2.
- 9.1Biomass Co-firing and gaseous emissions – – – – – – -27<br>
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- MATERIALS AND METHODS<br>
- 3.1Sampling /Sample Collection- – – – – – – – -29<br>8<br>
- 3.2Sample Preparation- – – – – – – – – -30<br>
- 3.3Proximate Analysis- – – – – – – – – -31<br>3.
- 3.1Moisture Content- – – – – – – – – -31<br>3.
- 3.2Volatile Matter- – – – – – – – – -31<br>3.
- 3.3Ash Content- – – – – – – – – – -32<br>3.
- 3.4Fixed Carbon- – – – – – – – – – -32<br>3.
- 4.Calorific Value- – – – – – – – – -32<br>
- 3.5Ultimate Analysis- – – – – – – – – -33<br>
- 3.6Torrefaction- – – – – – – – – – -33<br>
- 3.7Scanning Electron Microscopic Test (SEM) – – – – – – -33<br>
- 3.8Data analysis- – – – – – – – – – -34<br>
- 3.9Potential Emission of Green House Gases from the Torrefied samples- – -34<br>
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- RESULTS AND DISCUSION<br>
- 4.1RESULTS- – – – – – – – – – -36<br>4.
- 1.1Proximate Analysis Results- – – – – – – – -36<br>4.
- 1.2Ultimate Analysis Results- – – – – – – – -39<br>4.
- 1.3Statistical Analysis Results- – – – – – – – -44<br>4.
- 1.4Comparisons of Significance- – – – – – – – -45<br>4.
- 1.5Results of the Potential Emissions of the Raw and Torrefied Samples- – -48<br>4.
- 1.6Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Results of samples- – – – -50<br>
- 4.2DISCUSSION- – – – – – – – – – -58<br>
- 4.3CONCLUSION- – – – – – – – – – -66<br>9<br>REFERENCES- – – – – – – – – – -68<br>APPENDIX- – – – – – – – – – -79</p><p> </p> <br><p></p>
Project Abstract
<p> </p><p>The effect of torrefaction temperature and residence time on the fuel properties of lignite, biomass<br>(coconut shells and cassava peels) and their blends was investigated. The samples were subjected to<br>three torrecfaction temperatures (200, 260 and 300oC) and at two residence times (10 and 20<br>minutes) using programmable muffle furnace. Blends of torrefied lignite and biomass were prepared<br>in two different ratios (8020 and 7030). The energy content, proximate and ultimate analyses of the<br>samples were determined using ASTM methods. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to<br>evaluate the pore size, fiber content, topography and the morphology of the samples. The potential<br>emissions of SO2, CO2 and NOx from the torrefied samples were evaluated using emission estimation<br>model for fossil fuel electric power generation. The proximate analysis showed that the ash (8.0 %)<br>and moisture (30.0 %) contents of lignite were higher than that of the biomass. The coconut shells<br>and cassava peels had higher volatile matter of 72.9 % and 68.1 % respectively and much lower<br>fixed carbon. The data showed that release of volatile matter decreased at severe torrefaction<br>condition. The content of fixed carbon and energy increased with the severity of the torrefaction<br>condition except for cassava peels which decreased at 300 oC. One–way analysis of variance on the<br>results of the proximate analysis showed that there was significant difference (P<0.05) between the<br>volatile matter, fixed carbon, energy and ash content of lignite, coconut shells and cassava peels, but<br>no significant difference between the moisture and solid yield. For the blends, volatile matter was<br>found to be higher than that of lignite alone. Increase of biomass ratio in the blends decreased the<br>carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur content of the<br>samples. Lignite/coconut shells (7030) had better fuel properties compared to (8020) and lignite/ca<br>ssava peels (at both ratios). Results of the ultimate analysis showed that after torrefaction there were<br>large reduction in oxygen and hydrogen content. However, 15 % carbon, 26 % nitrogen and<br>72 % sulfur was reduced from cassava peels while lignite recorded an increase of 40 % carbon,5<br>6 % nitrogen and 48 % sulfur after torrefaction. The SEM image showed that torrefied lignite had a<br>uniform and denser structure compared to the raw. The torrefied coconut shells showed a<br>destroyed and less fibrous structure than the raw while the torrefied cassava peels showed a smootsu<br>rface. The fiber length of lignite, coconut shells and cassava peels decreased after torrefaction.<br>Results of the emission potential showed that emissions of SO2,CO2 and NOX from lignite and<br>coconut shells increased after torrefaction, while cassava peels decreased. It was also found that b<br>lending biomass and lignite reduced emissions of SO2, CO2 and NOX from lignite. Torrefaction<br>improved the fuel properties of lignite and biomass such as heating value grindability, hydrophobicit<br>y, and uniformity. Blending the two fuels (lignite/biomass) provided a way to compensate the<br>negative effects of each other. Therefore, producers of power and heat should explore the use<br>of torrefied lignite, coconut shells, cassava peels and their blends as suitable fuels.</p><p><strong> </strong></p> <br><p></p>
Project Overview
<p>
INTRODUCTION<br>1.2 Coal<br>One of the most important field of study in the realm of science and technology is that of<br>fuel because the whole of our world’s civilization is based upon an unceasing availability of<br>power. Coal (from the Old English term col, which meant “mineral of fossilized carbon” since the<br>13th century) [1] is a combustible black or brownish-black sedimentary rock usually occurring in<br>rock strata in layers or veins called coal beds or coal seams. It is one of the most important of the<br>primary fossil fuels and is composed primarily of carbon along with variable quantities of other<br>elements, chiefly hydrogen, sulfur, oxygen, and nitrogen [2].<br>Although fossil fuels have their origin in ancient biomass, they are not considered biomass<br>by the generally accepted definition because they contain carbon that has been “out” of the carbon<br>cycle for a very long time. Their combustion therefore disturbs the carbon dioxide content in the<br>atmosphere. Their structure varies based on their age and also the amount of pressure applied over<br>time.<br>Coal is the most abundant fuel in the fossil family [2]. United States has more coal reserves<br>than any other country in the world. In fact, one-fourth of all known coal in the world is in the<br>United States, with large deposits located in 38 states [2]. Like all fossil fuels, coal can be burned to<br>release energy.<br>1.2 Coal Formation<br>14<br>Coal forms from the accumulation of plant debris usually in a swamp environment. When<br>plant dies and falls into the swamp, the standing water of the swamp protects it from decay.<br>Swamp waters are usually deficient in oxygen, which would react with the plant debris and cause it<br>to decay. This lack of oxygen allows the plant debris to persist. In addition, insects and other<br>organisms that might consume the plant debris on land do not survive well under water in an<br>oxygen deficient environment. To form the thick layer of plant debris required to produce a coal<br>seam, the rate of plant debris accumulation must be greater than the rate of decay. Once a thick<br>layer of plant debris is formed, it must be buried by sediments such as mud or sand. The weight of<br>these materials compacts the plant debris and aids in its transformation into coal. About ten feet of<br>plant debris will compact into just one foot of coal. Plant debris accumulates very<br>slowly. Therefore, accumulating ten feet of plant debris will take a long time. The fifty feet of<br>plant debris needed to make a five-foot thick coal seam would require thousands of years to<br>accumulate.<br>Due to the variety of materials buried over time in the creation of fossil fuels and the<br>length of time the coal was forming, several types were created. Depending upon its composition,<br>each type of coal burns differently and releases different types of emissions. The four types (or<br>“ranks”) of coal mined today are lignite, sub-bituminous, bituminous, and anthracite. Coal forms<br>when dead plant matter is converted into peat, which in turn is converted into lignite, then subbituminous<br>coal, bituminous coal and lastly anthracite. This involves biochemical and geological<br>processes (diagenesis and catagenesis respectively). The major methods of mining coals are<br>surface (opencast or open cut) mining, underground (deep) mining and underground gasification.<br>Lignite is a soft brownish-black coal; it forms the lowest rank of the coal family. It has<br>higher moisture and less carbon content than the higher rank coal. Nigeria has the largest deposit<br>15<br>of lignite in Africa e.g. Garinmaiganga and Tai mines in Gombe state [3]. Sub-bituminous is a dull<br>black coal. It gives off a little more energy (heat) than lignite when burned. In Nigeria, subbituminous<br>coal is mined in Onekama and Okpara mine in Enugu state and Okaba mine in Benue<br>state. [4] Bituminous coal has more energy than sub-bituminous but Anthracite is the hardest coal<br>and gives off the greatest amount of heat upon combustion. Unfortunately, in Nigeria, as elsewhere<br>in the world, there is little anthracite coal to be mined.<br>1.3 Coal Combustion<br>Coal combustion is the burning of coal in the presence of oxygen. This aims at heat<br>(energy) generation. When the combustible materials such as carbon, hydrogen or compounds<br>containing these are ignited in the presence of air (oxygen), combustion takes place. The<br>combination of carbon, hydrogen and sulfur with oxygen may be expressed by the following<br>equations.<br>C + O2 CO2 ……………..… (1)<br>2H2 + O2 2H2O ………….….. (2)<br>S + O2 SO2…………….… (3)<br>Sulfur in coal burns off as gaseous sulfur which combines with oxygen to form SO2 and probably<br>SO3 on further oxidation. The combustion of coal releases several environmental pollutant such as<br>SO2, NO2, CO, CO2, and CH4<br>[5].<br>1.4 Environmental Impacts of Coal<br>16<br>The environmental impact of coal includes issues such as land use, waste management,<br>water, and air pollution. Starting from coal mining, blasting, processing, transportation and use of<br>its products, SO2, NO2, CO, CO2, and CH4 are formed [6, 7]. These gases are hazardous to<br>health. They affect the vegetation and aquatics when diffused to streams, rivers and air [8-10]. In<br>addition to atmospheric pollution, coal combustion produces hundreds of millions of tonnes of<br>solid waste products annually, including fly ash, bottom ash, and flue-gas desulfurization<br>sludge [11-13].<br>1.5 Biomass<br>Biomass is a renewable energy source not only because its energy comes from the sun but<br>also because biomass can re-grow over a relatively short period of time. Through the process of<br>photosynthesis, chlorophyll in plants captures the sun’s energy by converting carbon dioxide from<br>the air and water from the ground into carbohydrates—complex compounds composed of carbon,<br>hydrogen, and oxygen [14]. When these carbohydrates are burnt, they turn back into carbon dioxide<br>and water and release the energy they captured from the sun [15-18]. In this way, biomass functions<br>as a sort of natural battery for storing solar energy. Biomass is a biological material derived from<br>living or recently living organisms. It often refers to plants or plant-based materials which are<br>specifically called lignocellulose biomass [19-24]. It refers to organic matter that has stored energy<br>through the process of photosynthesis [25, 26]. It exists in one form as plants and may be transferred<br>through the food chain to animal’s bodies and their wastes. All of which can be converted for<br>everyday human use through processes such as combustion, which releases the carbon dioxide<br>17<br>stored in the plant material [27, 28]. Many of the biomass fuels used today come in the form of wood<br>products, dried vegetation, crop residues and aquatic plants.<br>1.6 Justification of the Study<br>The importance of energy for a nation’s development cannot be overemphasized. This is<br>because energy is the cornerstone of economic and social development. In Nigeria, the energy<br>demand is high and is increasing geometrically while the supply remains inadequate. The energy<br>supply mix must thus be diversified through promoting and developing the abundant energy<br>resources present in the country to enhance the security of supply.<br>Coal which generates 40% of the world’s electricity has however been neglected for a long<br>time in Nigeria because the existed coal power production facilities degraded the environment<br>through pollution. Alternatively, co-firing biomass along with coal offers advantages but mostly<br>boilers are specifically designed for coals of certain ranks such as bituminous and subbituminous<br>coal. This is because bituminous and sub bituminous coal has higher carbon and lower<br>moisture contents compared with lignite. There are less similar ranking for lignite and biomass.<br>And since their physical properties are highly diverse, so are the costs for getting these fuels from<br>the field or into the boiler. Biomass and lignite have a relatively low-energy density and high<br>moisture content and as such tend to rot during storage. Biomass has the tendency to have a fibrous<br>nature that can make it difficult to grind into small particles. In order to successfully co-fire<br>biomass with lignite, both fuels need pretreatment to increase the heating value, hydrophobicity,<br>bulk density, stability during storage and grindability.<br>18<br>Torrefaction has been proposed as a method to improve biomass`s properties for<br>gasification and combustion. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the impact of such a<br>treatment on the fuel properties of lignite, cassava peels and coconut shell.<br>1.7 Objectives of the Study<br>The objectives of this study are as follows:<br>1. To produce suitable torrefied biomass that can improve the fuel properties of lignite.<br>2. To investigate the effect of torrefaction temperature and residence time on the physical and<br>chemical properties of lignite, coconut shells and cassava peels.<br>3. To investigate the effect of torrefaction on the pore size, fiber content, topography and<br>the morphology structure of lignite, coconut shells and cassava peels.<br>4. To determine the influence of blend ratio on the fuel properties of the torrefied lignite, coconut<br>shells and cassava peels.<br>5. To investigate the effect of torrefaction on the possible reduction of pollutant elements from the<br>lignite, coconut shells and cassava peels.<br>19
<br></p>