Probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented sap of palm tree (Elaeis guineensis)
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Probiotics
- 2.2History of Probiotic Research
- 2.3Types of Probiotic Strains
- 2.4Mechanisms of Probiotic Action
- 2.5Health Benefits of Probiotics
- 2.6Probiotics in Food Industry
- 2.7Safety and Regulations of Probiotics
- 2.8Probiotic Supplements
- 2.9Challenges in Probiotic Research
- 2.10Future Trends in Probiotics
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Methodology Overview
- 3.2Research Design
- 3.3Sampling Techniques
- 3.4Data Collection Methods
- 3.5Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.6Research Ethics
- 3.7Validity and Reliability
- 3.8Limitations of the Methodology
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Data
- 4.3Comparison of Results
- 4.4Interpretation of Results
- 4.5Discussion on Key Findings
- 4.6Implications of Findings
- 4.7Recommendations for Future Research
- 4.8Conclusion
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Research
- 5.2Conclusions Drawn
- 5.3Contributions to Knowledge
- 5.4Practical Implications
- 5.5Recommendations for Practice
- 5.6Areas for Future Research
Project Abstract
<p> <b>ABSTRACT</b><br></p><p> The commonly used probiotics bacteria are lactic acid bacteria (LAB) from gastro intestinal tract. However, other LAB from exogenous origin having similar functional properties may also confer health benefit to the host. Palm wine has been described as a rich source of LAB. But very few studies have investigated their probiotic potential. Twenty LAB were isolated from palm wine collected in the South West Region of Cameroon by pour plate method on MRS agar. These isolates were assessed in vitro for their potential to inhibit the growth of some foodborne pathogens, mainly Salmonella sp. and Escherichia coli using disc diffusion method. Acid and bile tolerance were evaluated by measuring the survival rate of LAB after incubation at pH range from 1.0 to 3.0 and various bile salt concentrations (0.15-0.30%). Only five isolates were selected based on their potential to inhibit food borne pathogens tested and their tolerance in acid and bile. They were identified using API kit 50 CHL BioMerieux as strains of Lactobacillus pentosus, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus brevis. All these strains showed antimicrobial activity against strains of Salmonella sp. and E. coli with diameters of inhibition varying from 12 to 20 mm. Only L. pentosus and L. brevis1 tolerated pH 3.0 (acidic condition of interest) with survival rates of 55 and 69% respectively, while all survived in bile with survival rates above 60%. Key words Probiotics, antimicrobial activity, acid tolerance, bile tolerance. <br></p>
Project Overview
<p><b>1.0 INTRODUCTION </b></p><p><b>1.1 BACKGROUND STUDY</b></p><p>The concept of food having medicinal value has been
reborn as 'functional foods'. The list of health benefits
accredited to functional foods continue to increase and
the gut is an obvious target for the development of
functional foods, because it acts as an interface between
the diet and all other body functions. One of the most
promising areas for the development of functional food
components lies in the use of probiotics. Probiotics, are
live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate
amounts, confer health benefits on the host (FAO/WHO,
2002). One of the most accepted approaches through
which the gut microbiota composition can be influenced is
through the use of probiotics; which are life microbial
dietary additives.
Besides the nutritional values, ingestion of lactic acid
bacteria (LAB) and their fermented foods has been
suggested to confer a range of health benefits including
immune system modulation, increased resistance to
malignancy and infectious illness (Soccol et al., 2010).
Vergin in 1954 suggested that the microbial imbalance in
the body caused by antibiotic treatment could have been
restored by a probiotic rich diet; a suggestion cited by
many as the first reference to probiotics as they are
defined nowadays. </p><p>Similarly, Vasiljevic and Shah (2008)
recognized detrimental effects of antibiotic therapy and
proposed the prevention by probiotics. The idea of
health-promoting effects of LAB is by no means new, as
Metchnikoff proposed that lactobacilli may fight against
intestinal putrefaction and contribute to long life (Brant
and Todd, 2014). Such microorganisms may not
necessarily be constant inhabitants of the gut, but they
should have a “beneficial effect on the health status of
man and animal” (Belhadj et al., 2010). For the
gastrointestinal ecosystem, the most important microbial
species that are used as probiotics are LAB.
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are the most prominent nonpathogenic bacteria that play a vital role in our everyday
life, from fermentation to preservation, food and vitamin
production, and to prevention of certain diseases and
cancer due to their probiotics properties. These
microorganisms are one of the prominent groups of
bacteria which inhabit the gastrointestinal tract, and the
importance of these non-pathogenic bacteria has been
more noticed (Krishnendra et al., 2013). Several
lactobacilli have been noted to have nutritional benefits,
improved lactose utilization, have anti-cholesterol and
anti-carcinogenic, and protection against other diseases
(Krishnendra et al., 2013). </p><p>Especially, Lactobacillus spp.
are well known producers of antimicrobial compounds
especially bacteriocins which have high antimicrobial
activity (Aween et al., 2012). The production of these
compounds by intestinal microflora is one of the most
important mechanisms responsible for the antagonistic
activity against intestinal pathogens and therefore it is
essential to examine this property in isolates that are
candidates for probiotics (Bilkova et al., 2011). Effective
probiotics should possess antimicrobial activity
particularly to the pathogens of the gastrointestinal tract
(Klayraung et al., 2008).
Palm wine is an alcoholic beverage produced from the
sap of various palm tree species. The drink is particularly
common in parts of Africa, South India and the
Philippines. In Africa, the sap is most often taken from oil
palms such as Elaeis guineensis, or from Raffia, kithul or
Nipa palms (Ukhum et al., 2005). Besides fermenting
yeast belonging to various genera e.g Saccharomyces,
Candida, Endomycopsis, Hausenula, Pichia, Saccharomy
Fossi et al. 43
codes and Schizosaccharomyces (Ezeronye and Legras,
2009; Chandrasekhar et al., 2012), the dominant
bacterial population of palm wine was previously
described as lactic acid bacteria-strains of Lactobacillus
plantarum, Leuconostoc mesenteriodes and L.
mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum.. </p><p>Palm wine is milkywhite and effervescent because of the presence of live
bacteria and yeast (Ezeronye, 2009) resulting from
natural fermentation. The sap of palm tree has been
shown to be a rich medium capable of supporting the
growth of various types of microorganisms. In general,
the methods of palm wine tapping and collection of palm
sap, including air and the environment as a whole,
influence the microbial content of the sap (Amoa-Awwa et
al., 2007; Naknean et al., 2010).
Palm wine plays an important role in many ceremonies
in Cameroon, parts of Nigeria such as among the Igbo
people, and elsewhere in Central and Western Africa.
Guests at weddings, birth celebrations and funeral wakes
are served generous quantities. The wine is often infused
with medicinal herbs to treat a wide variety of physical
complaints.
The widely used probiotic bacteria reported in literature
were isolated from gastro intestinal tract, but very few are
from exogenous origin such as palm wine. This study
aimed at investigating the probiotic potential of lactic acid
bacteria from palm wine. </p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS </b></p><p>Sample collection
Thirty samples of fresh palm sap were collected in sterile widemouth bottles directly from the farmers and transported to the
laboratory for processing. The samples were kept at room
temperature for 48 h for fermentation to take place. After which they
were carefully processed under aseptic conditions.
Isolation and phenotypic identification of lactic acid bacteria
LAB was isolated from palm wine by pour plate method using De
Man Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) agar. For this purpose, 1 ml of
each sample was added to 9 ml of saline solution (NaCl, 0.85%). 1
ml aliquot of the 10-4 and 10-5
dilutions was aseptically disposed on
sterile plates. About 15 ml of MRS agar was poured onto it and
allowed to solidify. All plates were incubated at 30°C for 48 h under
anaerobic conditions. After the incubation, a preliminary catalase
test was carried out. Catalase negative discrete colonies which
appeared on the plates with distinct morphological differences such
as color, shape and size were picked and purified 2-3 times by restreaking on fresh MRS agar. The pure colonies were further
characterized using Gram staining test and cell morphology
examinations. Catalase negative and Gram positive isolates were
preserved in 15% glycerol at -80°C until identification. Carbohydrate
fermentation patterns of LAB were determined using API 50 CHL kit
(bioMerieux, France). </p><p>The APILAB PLUS database software was
used to interpret the results.
Antimicrobial activity of LAB
The antimicrobial activity of LAB was determined by modifying the
disc diffusion method of Hamdan and Mikolajcik (1974). Sterile filter
discs (diameter; 6 mm) were dipped into the cultured MRS broth of
LAB incubated at 30°C for 24 h in a shaker (187 rpm) and placed
on solidified Mueller-Hinton agar (LIOFILCHEM DIAGNOSTICI)
seeded with 14 h cultures of indicator microorganisms. The plates
were kept at 4°C for 3 h to permit diffusion on the assay material,
and incubated at 37°C for 16 h. Some of the discs were dipped in
un-inoculated MRS broth which served as negative control. Also,
antibiotic discs of Ofloxacin and Azithromycine were placed on
solidified Muller-Hinton agar (LIOFILCHEM DIAGNOSTICI) seeded
with 14 h cultures of indicator microorganisms and incubated under
the same conditions. These served as positive control for the tests
on Salmonella enteric subsp. enterica and E. coli, respectively.
Their zones of inhibition (clear zones around the discs) were
evaluated. This was done by using a ruler to measure the diameter
of the disk plus the surrounding clear area in millimeters (mm).
Tolerance to acidic conditions
The lactic acid bacteria isolates were cultured in MRS broth for 18
h. The LAB cells were harvested by centrifugation for 10 min at
5000 rpm and 4°C. Pellets were washed trice in phosphate-saline
buffer (PBS at pH 6.2). The pH was adjusted by a pH meter with the
use of HCl 1 N to pH 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 6.2 (control pH). The cell
pellets (107
-108 CFU/ml) were resuspended in 10 ml of PBS (pH
1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 6.2) and incubated at 30°C for 1, 2, 3 and 4 h. The
cells were enumerated by plating 100 µL aliquot of the inoculated
PBS solutions at the various tested times, for 24 h. The
experiments were performed in duplicates.
Bile tolerance
These lactic acid bacteria isolates were cultured in MRS broth, for
16-18 h. The LAB cells were harvested by centrifugation for 10 min
at 5000 rpm and 4°C. Pellets were washed trice in phosphatesaline buffer (PBS at pH 6.2) and resuspended in PBS (pH 6.2).
Two sets of MRS broth were prepared containing 0.15 % (w/v)
oxgall-bile and the other 0.30% (w/v) oxgall-bile. Also, one set of
MRS broth was prepared without oxgall-bile. This served as the
control. These sets of MRS broth were inoculated with 100 µl
aliquot of the LAB suspensions (107
-108 CFU/ml) and incubated for
1, 2, 3 and 4 h. Then, viable bacteria counts were obtained after 24
h incubation at 37°C (Barakat et al., 2011).
The experiments were
performed in duplicates. In both cases, the survival percentage of
LAB was calculated by the following formula: </p><p><br></p>