ANALYSIS OF LIVELIHOOD DIVERSIFICATION BY FARMING HOUSEHOLDS IN SELECTED LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS OF KADUNA STATE, NIGERIA
Table Of Contents
- <p>Title Page……………………………………………………………………...................................................i </p><p>Declaration………………………………………………………………………….…......................................ii</p><p>Certification……………………………………………………………………….…..........................................iii </p><p>Dedication …………………………………………………………………………..…........................................iv </p><p>Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………………..…..........................................v </p><p>Table of contents…………………………………………..................................................................................vi </p><p>List of Tables…………………………………………………………………………..............................................ix </p><p>List of Figures………………………………………………………………………….............................................ix </p><p>List of Appendix………………………………………………………………………..............................................ix</p><p> Abstract……………………………………………………………………….……….................................................x </p><p>
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- ……………………………………………………………………...................................................1 </p><p>INTRODUCTION………………………….………………………………………......................................................1 </p><p>
- 1.1Background of the study ……………………………………………….……….................................................1 </p><p>
- 1.2Problem Statement………………………………………………………...........................................................2 </p><p>
- 1.3Objectives of the study…………………………………………………….….................................................…4 </p><p>
- 1.4Justification of the Study…………………………………………………….….................................................5 <br></p><p>
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- ……………………………………………………………….……..............................................…6 </p><p>LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………………………...…………....................................................6 </p><p>
- 2.1Socio-Economic characteristics of farmers………………..………………….................................................6 </p><p>
- 2.2Rural household income………..………………………………………….…...................................................8 </p><p>
- 2.3Rural livelihoods and their natures ………….……………………………….................................................10 <br></p><p>
- 2.4The concept of livelihood ……………………………………….………….…................................................12 </p><p>2.
- 4.1Strategies of livelihood...…………………………………………………....................................................14 </p><p>2.
- 4.2Determinants of livelihood …………………………………………………….............................................15 </p><p>2.
- 4.3Sustainable livelihood .………………………………………………………................................................15 </p><p>
- 2.5Empirical study on livelihood diversification .………………………………..................................................16 </p><p>
- 2.6Empirical study on Logit Regression Model……………………………….................................................…19 </p><p>
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- ………………………………………………………………..............................................…..23 </p><p>METHODOLOGY...…………………………………………………………….................................................…….23 </p><p>
- 3.1Description of the Study Area ………………………………………………...................................................23 </p><p>
- 3.2Sampling Procedure and sample size .………………………………………................................................25 </p><p>
- 3.3Method of Data Collection ..……………………………………………….................................................….25 </p><p>
- 3.4Analytical techniques ………………………………………………………..................................................26 </p><p>
- 3.5Measurement of Dependent and independent variables………………………...........................................28 </p><p>
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- ……………………………………………………………….....................................................31 </p><p> RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ….………………………………………………..................................................31 </p><p>4.
- 1.1Age distribution of the respondents…………………………………………..............................................31 </p><p>4.
- 1.2Household size of the respondents….………………………..……………...............................................32 </p><p>4.
- 1.3Educational level of the farmers .…….……….……………………………...............................................33 </p><p>4.
- 1.4Farming experience of the respondents ……………………………………...............................................33 </p><p>4.
- 1.5Distribution of respondents according to farm size .................................................................................34 </p><p>4.
- 1.6Credit obtain by the respondent……………………………………….............................................……....35 </p><p>4.
- 1.7Distribution of respondent based on membership of cooperative society…...........................................36 </p><p>4.
- 1.8Distribution of respondent according to their income……………………............................................…..37 </p><p>
- 4.2Livelihood Activities Engage in by Farmers …………………………….................................................……38 <br></p><p>
- 4.3Socioeconomic factors influencing farming household livelihood diversification……………………...........39 </p><p>
- 4.4Impact of diversification on household output, income and level of living……………………………….....42 </p><p>4.
- 4.1Impact of diversification on household output……………………….…....................................................42 </p><p>4.
- 4.2Impact of diversification on household income…………………………................................................…43 </p><p>4.
- 4.3Impact of diversification on household level of living…………………................................................….44 </p><p>4.4.
- 3.1Hypotheses of the study………………………………………………............................................….….45 </p><p>
- 4.5Constraints mitigating the farming household …………………………..................................................…..47 </p><p>
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- ………………………………………………………………..................................................…...50 </p><p>SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, & RECOMMENDATIONS ……………………..................................................…50 </p><p>
- 5.1Summary ……………………………………………………….………......................................................…...50 </p><p>
- 5.2Conclusion ..………………………………………………….…………….......................................................51 </p><p>
- 5.3Contribution to knowledge ………………………………………….…….......................................................52 </p><p>
- 5.4Recommendations ……………………………………………………...................................................…….52 </p><p>REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………................................................….54 <br></p>
Project Abstract
<p> <b>ABSTRACT </b></p><p>This study focused on analyse of livelihood diversification by farming households in Kachia, Kagarko and Jaba Local Government areas of Kaduna State, Nigeria. Primary data were collected from 220 respondents using structured questionnaire. The statistical tools used to analyse the data were descriptive statistics, logit regression and t-statistics. The result of the analysis shows that the average age of the farming households were 44 years with an average household size of 7 persons. Majority (64%) of the respondents were not literate. The respondent had an average farming experience of 18 years. About 90% of the respondents do not have access to credit; the respondents had an average farm size of 1 hectare. However, 85% of the farmers do not belong to any cooperative association while about half 50% of the respondents had no other source of income. The result of this study also shows that all the households derived income from farming which in average account for 60.6% of the total household income. Crop production provides about 51.3% of total income. More than half of the household derived income livestock enterprises which however account for only 9.3% of total income. The estimated coefficients of the Logit model, along with the standard error, t-values and marginal effect are presented. The likelihood ratio test was 63.259 with 6 degree of freedom is significant at (p≤0.01). The t-test indicated that there was significant difference between output, income and level of living of household that are involved in livelihood diversification and non-diversifying household. The result shows that the output, income and level of living had significance on the household that are involved in livelihood diversification at p< 0.05 level of probability.Lastly, among the major constraints to livelihood diversification in the study area were lack of credit facilities, poor asset base, lack of awareness and training facilities, fear of taking risk and lack of opportunities in non-farm sector. It could be concluded that engagement in offfarmincome generation activities decreases with farming experience while it increases with male-headed household, education, credit and market. It is recommended that the monetary authority in collaboration with the government should promote non-farm employment by ensuring farmers access to credit. <br></p>
Project Overview