A comparative analysis of english and igala morphological processes
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Introduction to Literature Review
- 2.2Overview of Morphological Processes
- 2.3English Morphological Processes
- 2.4Igala Morphological Processes
- 2.5Comparative Analysis of English and Igala Morphological Processes
- 2.6Previous Studies on English Morphology
- 2.7Previous Studies on Igala Morphology
- 2.8Theoretical Frameworks in Morphology
- 2.9Challenges in Comparing English and Igala Morphology
- 2.10Summary of Literature Review
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Introduction to Research Methodology
- 3.2Research Design
- 3.3Data Collection Methods
- 3.4Sampling Techniques
- 3.5Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.6Reliability and Validity
- 3.7Ethical Considerations
- 3.8Limitations of the Research Methodology
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Introduction to Discussion of Findings
- 4.2Comparison of English and Igala Morphological Processes
- 4.3Analysis of Data Collected
- 4.4Interpretation of Results
- 4.5Implications of Findings
- 4.6Recommendations for Further Research
- 4.7Practical Applications of the Study
- 4.8Conclusion of Discussion of Findings
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Conclusion and Summary of the Research
- 5.2Recap of Research Objectives
- 5.3Key Findings and Contributions
- 5.4Recommendations for Practice
- 5.5Suggestions for Future Research
Project Abstract
<p> </p><p>English language is widely spoken across the globe. Igala language is not that favoured. It is spoken locally in its geographical location. This research studies the two languages comparatively. The notion of comparative analysis is essentially aimed at establishing, the possibilities of differences or similarities in any field of interest. In this research, the comparison is aimed at establishing the points of divergence and convergence in an international (English) and locally spoken language (Igala). Firstly, the theory of grammar universals proposes that all languages whatever their composition and disposition, are structurally and semantically identical.</p><p>Secondly, the notion of the universality of morphology in the same vein, proposes that there exist the concept of morphemes and morphological processes in all languages of the world. These claims account for the reason why this research, looks at morphological processes as used in both languages. The researcher examines the notion of morphological processes in Igala. To establish what processes are employed and how the processes occur in English. It is based on this comparison that data was generated for analyses on the findings of the research.</p><p>The researcher used the concept of Hallidayβs (1975) scale and category theory, and Nidaβs (1949) six principles for identifying morphemes in the study of both languages, after which conclusion were drawn.</p> <br><p></p>
Project Overview
<p>
</p><p><strong>1.0 INTRODUCTION</strong></p><p>Language is very important to man and his environment. It has pulled a lot of concern from time past, till date – hence the birth of the field of linguistics. Here, languages are studied scientifically for obvious reasons. It is most fundamental to human communications and existence. It does not occur haphazardly De Saussure (1959: 7–11) but demonstrates patterns; it is innate abilities that result in formed grammatical sentences. It is purely attributable to humans “… a system of voluntary produced symbols”, Sapir (1921). The importance of language therefore cannot be overlooked. It cannot be separated from individual and society. Language is an embodiment of speech through which the lives and experiences of individuals in the society are expressed. Every language of the world has a set of specified rules that must be observed by the users to enhance understanding. These sets of rules are the concern of linguists. Hence the classification of language arms according to the tenets of these rules – syntax, phonology, semantics, pragmatics, morphology etc.</p><p><strong>1.1 THE IGALA LANGUAGE</strong></p><p><strong>History Of The Igala Orthography And Dialect</strong></p><p>The Igala language was committed to writing at about the mid 19th century by Clark (1848). This was closely followed by the work of Rev. Koelle – Polyglotta Africana (1854), and Bishop Ajayi Crowder. All<br>these initial efforts were written wordlist, which were compared with their English counterparts. The first known Igala Primer was published by Rev. A. G. Coomber. Akinkugbe (1975, 78). This also contributed to Igala language studies. His work was a comparative work on Yoruba, Itsekiri and Igala.</p><p>Despite all the studies on Igala the issue of which orthography is best and should be used became a<br>controversy, until the resolution ‘7’ (1984) after the national seminar. Igala like other languages of the world, comprises of various dialects. Though no known work has been done on the dialects of Igala, experience, interactions as an indigenous speaker of the language and works as presented in dissertations and books confers the authority to so distinguish. Further, Furgerson and Gumperz (1973: 94-95) expressed in the book, Language and Language Learning, An Edinburg Course in Applied Linguistics, that, any set or language that shares at least a feature or combination of features, qualifies to be dialects of the same language.</p><p>Igala is spoken far beyond her political boundaries of the eastern part of Kogi State (Idoma, Nsukka),<br>western Igbo (Lokoja, Etsako, Ebu, Asaba etc). The speakers occupy the bulk of the territory within the lower Niger basin and are surrounded by the rivers Benue and Niger respectively. They are also bordered by the Northern part of Onitsha, through the confluence, to the North-east of Benue, terminating at Amagede around the Igala Agatu boundary.</p><p>Akinkugbe (1978), classifies Igala as one of the Yoruboid branches. Obviously, there exist some similarities between Igala and Yoruba.</p><p><strong>Igala</strong></p><p><strong>Yoruba</strong></p><p><strong>English</strong></p><p>Owo</p><p>Owo</p><p>Hand</p><p>Omi</p><p>Omi</p><p>Water</p><p>Oko</p><p>Oko</p><p>Husband</p><p>Alu</p><p>Enu</p><p>Mouth etc.</p><p>Armstrong (1953), likens Igala and Yoruba relationship to that of English and German, and English<br>and Latin. However described, they (Yoruba and Igala) all belong to the Niger-Congo family. Consider the following…</p>
<br><p></p>