Impact of treasury bills returns on financial intermediation in nigeria
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Treasury Bills
- 2.2Financial Intermediation in Nigeria
- 2.3Relationship between Treasury Bills Returns and Financial Intermediation
- 2.4Historical Trends of Treasury Bills Returns in Nigeria
- 2.5Impact of Treasury Bills Returns on Economic Stability
- 2.6Global Perspective on Treasury Bills Investments
- 2.7Regulatory Framework for Treasury Bills Investments
- 2.8Empirical Studies on Treasury Bills Returns
- 2.9Challenges of Investing in Treasury Bills
- 2.10Opportunities of Investing in Treasury Bills
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design
- 3.2Population and Sampling Techniques
- 3.3Data Collection Methods
- 3.4Data Analysis Techniques
- 3.5Research Instrumentation
- 3.6Ethical Considerations
- 3.7Validity and Reliability
- 3.8Limitations of the Research Methodology
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Analysis of Treasury Bills Returns Data
- 4.2Impact of Treasury Bills Returns on Financial Intermediation Institutions
- 4.3Comparison of Treasury Bills Returns with Other Investment Vehicles
- 4.4Factors Influencing Treasury Bills Returns
- 4.5Implications of Treasury Bills Returns on Economic Growth
- 4.6Recommendations for Investors
- 4.7Policy Implications for Financial Intermediaries
- 4.8Future Research Directions
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Implications for Financial Intermediation in Nigeria
- 5.4Recommendations for Policy Makers
- 5.5Contributions to Existing Literature
- 5.6Areas for Further Research
Project Abstract
<p> <em>This study attempts to examine the impact of Deposit money banks’ investment on treasury Bills and the impact thereof on the amount of credit extended by these banks to the private sector in Nigeria. The study estimated a model which suggests that supply of loans and advances by DMBs was a function of Total deposit, Treasury Bills, FGN Bonds, interbank rates, and the Yield spread between Loans and Treasury Bills. A Vector Error Correction (VEC) technique was used to estimate the model using quarterly data for the period of 2003-2013. The study finds that (i) a negative relationship exists between loans to the private sector and treasury bills holding of DMBs (ii) the spread between credit to private sector and Treasury Bills returns determined their demand in the short run, and (iii) FGN Bonds had a more significant negative effect on financial intermediation than Treasury Bills. The study concludes that demand for government’s deficit financing instruments reduced financial intermediation in Nigeria but the effect runs more through FGN Bonds than through Treasury Bills. From these findings, the study recommends that policies which could stabilize the economy and stimulate high investment returns in the longer term could encourage banks to concentrate more on intermediation activities, and policies that would re-align the returns government debt instruments and private sector debt instrument could further deepen the market and encourage competition between government and private sector debt instruments.</em> <br></p>
Project Overview
<p>
</p><p><strong>INTRODUCTION</strong></p><p><strong>1.1 </strong><strong>Background to the Study</strong></p><p>With regards to the rising government deficit in Nigeria, the Nigerian government, while having several other financing options such as running down its cash reserves, selling some of its assets like properties or printing more currency (ways and means advances), has heavily relied on short term borrowing from the banking system – more specifically by means of Treasury Bills.</p><p>Deposit Money Banks (DMBs) are the most dominant players in the Nigerian financial system holding 68 percent of the total deposits of the financial sector in the year 2012 (CBN, 2013). However, some of the perennial policy challenges facing the banking sector in Nigeria, and indeed most developing countries, are the efficiency and effectiveness with which surplus funds are intermediated between surplus units and deficit units and how to improve it. These issues have been at the heart of various financial sector reforms in Nigeria. Most of the reforms have been focused on the liberalization of the financial system to ensure that the sector is proactively positioned to perform the role of intermediation and play a catalytic role in economic development (Ogege and Shiro, 2012). These policies have not yielded the desired result as the financial subsector has been periodically punctuated by several factors which have made it vulnerable to systemic distress, macro-economic volatility and policy fine tuning (Kama 2006).Credit to the private sector (as a % of total assets) from DMBs did not show any significant improvement between 2003 and 2013. It remained at an average of around 35.82% with the maximum being 42.28% in 2010. It rose from 31.70% in 2003 to 33.89% in 2004.</p>
<br><p></p>