Personnel perception of management of federal and state polytechnics in south -east nigeria
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of study
- 1.5Limitation of study
- 1.6Scope of study
- 1.7Significance of study
- 1.8Structure of the research
- 1.9Definition of terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Historical overview of polytechnics in South-East Nigeria
- 2.2Evolution of management practices in polytechnics
- 2.3Theoretical framework in management studies
- 2.4Management styles and theories
- 2.5Personnel perception in organizational settings
- 2.6Challenges facing polytechnic management
- 2.7Best practices in polytechnic management
- 2.8Comparative analysis of management in federal and state polytechnics
- 2.9Impact of management on personnel motivation
- 2.10Future trends in polytechnic management
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research design and methodology
- 3.2Sampling techniques and sample size
- 3.3Data collection methods
- 3.4Questionnaire design and administration
- 3.5Interview protocols
- 3.6Data analysis procedures
- 3.7Ethical considerations
- 3.8Validity and reliability of research instruments
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of research findings
- 4.2Analysis of personnel perception in polytechnics
- 4.3Comparison of federal and state polytechnic management
- 4.4Impact of management practices on personnel
- 4.5Recommendations for improving management in polytechnics
- 4.6Implications for policy and practice
- 4.7Areas for further research
- 4.8Conclusion and summary of findings
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of research objectives
- 5.2Discussion of key findings
- 5.3Contributions to the field
- 5.4Practical implications of the study
- 5.5Limitations of the study
- 5.6Recommendations for future research
- 5.7Conclusion and final remarks
Project Abstract
<p> The purpose of this study was to determine personnel perception of the management of federal and state polytechnics in South East Nigeria. Four research questions and four null hypotheses were generated and formulated respectively for the study. Descriptive survey design was employed and a 51-item questionnaire was developed and administered to 200 respondents in the six polytechnics. Disproportionate random sampling technique was used to select 10% of the 2003 lecturers giving 200. For fair representation of all the departments in the six polytechnics, 33 lecturers were chosen from each polytechnics. Focus group discussion was carried out with the student union government leaders of the six polytechnics while on-the-spot observation checklist was used for the physical facilities and equipment. There was also an interview schedule held with the principal officers and deans of schools of the six polytechnics in South East, Nigeria. The instrument was validated by three experts of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, two in educational administration and planning and one in measurement and evaluation. Two research assistants were trained and assisted the researcher in data collection while focus group discussion, interview and checklist were handled by the researcher. Eighty five percent of the questionnaire were duly completed and returned. To determine the reliability of the instruments, cronbach alpha method was used on the scores obtained in a trial testing to determine the internal consistency. The reliability of the whole instrument was .80. The statistics used for the analysis were the mean, standard deviation and t-test. Qualitative analysis was used to present the results of the focus group discussion and interview carried out. The study found that instructions are managed to a great extent, while financial, personnel and physical facilities/equipment are managed to less extent in the polytechnics. Overall, there is poor management of polytechnics in South East Nigeria. There were no significant differences (p > .05) in the mean rating scores of lectures on the extent of the management of instruction, personnel services and finance in Federal and State Polytechnics. However, there was a significant difference on the extent of management of facilities in favour of Federal Polytechnics. Based on the findings, some educational implications were drawn and the following recommendations were made Deans of schools and the heads of departments should supervise the lecturers on regular basis to guide them in being innovative and in ensuring that the lecture room environment is conducive for learning to take place. The funds allocated to these polytechnics should be judiciously and prudently used by the polytechnics administrators for the proper management of these polytechnics, employment of workers by the polytechnics authorities should follow the laid down rules in the polytechnics manual, the unavailability and poor condition of the existing physical facilities and equipment should be made known to the concerned bodies so that they can help by providing and maintaining some of the facilities lacking in these institutions. There should be improved funding of the polytechnics and there should be development of maintenance culture by the administrators. <br></p>
Project Overview