Effect of comparative grading in mathematics on students’ academic self-efficacy beliefs and achievement in aba education zone of abia state
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Theoretical Framework
- 2.2Historical Overview
- 2.3Conceptual Framework
- 2.4Empirical Studies
- 2.5Comparative Grading in Mathematics
- 2.6Academic Self-Efficacy Beliefs
- 2.7Achievement in Education
- 2.8Impact of Grading Systems
- 2.9Psychological Theories
- 2.10Educational Policies
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design
- 3.2Population and Sample
- 3.3Data Collection Methods
- 3.4Research Instruments
- 3.5Data Analysis Techniques
- 3.6Ethical Considerations
- 3.7Validity and Reliability
- 3.8Pilot Study
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Data Analysis
- 4.2Descriptive Statistics
- 4.3Inferential Statistics
- 4.4Comparison of Results
- 4.5Themes and Patterns
- 4.6Interpretation of Findings
- 4.7Discussion of Results
- 4.8Implications for Practice
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusions
- 5.3Contributions to Knowledge
- 5.4Recommendations for Future Research
- 5.5Practical Implications
Project Abstract
<p> The study was carried out to investigate the effect of comparative grading on students’ mathematics achievement and self-efficacy beliefs in Aba education zone. Also, the study explored the influence of gender and interaction effect on comparative grading in mathematics achievement of students’ self-efficacy. Four research questions were asked and four hypotheses were formulated and tested at the (P<0.05) level of significance. The study adopted a non – equivalent control group quasi- experimental research design involving one experimental group and one control group. Four co-educational secondary schools in Aba North Local Government. Area of Abia State were randomly selected and assigned to experimental and control group, and used for the study. A total of 200 SS One students (100 males and 100 females) in four intact classes were sampled and used for the study. Two instruments, Students’ Academic Self-efficacy Beliefs Questionnaire (SASEBQ), and Mathematics Achievement Test (MAT) were used for both pre-test and post-test. Data collected using the instruments were analyzed using descriptive statistics in answering the research questions while Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was used to test the null hypotheses. The result of the study showed that Students who were exposed to comparative grading achieved significantly higher than those exposed to criterion referenced grading. Also, there was no significant difference between the self-efficacy belief scores of male and female students on mathematics. Based on the findings, discussions implications and recommendations of this study, suggestions for further studies were mad. <br></p>
Project Overview
<p>
The study was carried out to investigate the effect of comparative grading on students’ mathematics achievement and self-efficacy beliefs in Aba education zone. Also, the study explored the influence of gender and interaction effect on comparative grading in mathematics achievement of students’ self-efficacy. Four research questions were asked and four hypotheses were formulated and tested at the (P<0.05) level of significance. The study adopted a non – equivalent control group quasi- experimental research design involving one experimental group and one control group. Four co-educational secondary schools in Aba North Local Government. Area of Abia State were randomly selected and assigned to experimental and control group, and used for the study. A total of 200 SS One students (100 males and 100 females) in four intact classes were sampled and used for the study. Two instruments, Students’ Academic Self-efficacy Beliefs Questionnaire (SASEBQ), and Mathematics Achievement Test (MAT) were used for both pre-test and post-test. Data collected using the instruments were analyzed using descriptive statistics in answering the research questions while Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was used to test the null hypotheses. The result of the study showed that Students who were exposed to comparative grading achieved significantly higher than those exposed to criterion referenced grading. Also, there was no significant difference between the self-efficacy belief scores of male and female students on mathematics. Based on the findings, discussions implications and recommendations of this study, suggestions for further studies were mad.
<br></p>