Appraisal of supervision of instruction in secondary schools in north-central, nigeria.
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Supervision of Instruction
- 2.2Historical Perspectives on Supervision in Education
- 2.3Theoretical Frameworks in Supervision of Instruction
- 2.4Models of Supervision in Education
- 2.5Importance of Supervision of Instruction
- 2.6Challenges in Implementing Effective Supervision
- 2.7Best Practices in Supervision of Instruction
- 2.8Empirical Studies on Supervision of Instruction
- 2.9Innovations in Supervision of Instruction
- 2.10Future Trends in Supervision of Instruction
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design and Methodology
- 3.2Population and Sampling Techniques
- 3.3Data Collection Methods
- 3.4Instrumentation and Data Analysis
- 3.5Ethical Considerations
- 3.6Pilot Study
- 3.7Data Validity and Reliability
- 3.8Data Presentation Techniques
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Supervision Practices in Secondary Schools
- 4.3Teachers' Perceptions of Supervision of Instruction
- 4.4Impact of Supervision on Teaching and Learning
- 4.5Comparison of Different Supervisory Models
- 4.6Recommendations for Improvement
- 4.7Implications for Policy and Practice
- 4.8Areas for Further Research
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusions
- 5.3Implications for Education Stakeholders
- 5.4Recommendations for Action
- 5.5Reflections on the Research Process
Project Abstract
<p> This study appraised supervision of instruction in secondary schools in North- Central, Nigeria. The study investigated the extent qualifications of supervisors of instruction; frequency of supervisory visits to secondary schools; supervisors’ adoption of approved supervision techniques in carrying out their assignment; and supervisors’ observation of teachers in the classroom are in line with Supervisors’ guidelines. The descriptive survey design was adopted for the study. Four research questions and three null hypotheses, tested at 0.05 level of significance guided the study. The study population comprised 11,285 respondents, made up of 678 supervisors, 1,228 principals and 9,379 teachers. Adopting stratified random sampling technique, 40 percent of the supervisors, principals and teachers from Benue, Nasarawa and Plateau States were selected to give a total sample of 2,297 respondents (148 supervisors, 252 principals and 1,897 teachers). A structured questionnaire with two sections I and II was used for data collection. Section I addressed the bio-data of the respondents while section II had four clusters with each cluster addressing each research question. The instrument was face validated by five experts, three from educational administration and planning and two from measurement and evaluation, all from University of Nigeria, Nsukka. The instrument was trial-tested on 120 respondents who are not part of the study population. The reliability coefficients of the instrument were determined using Cronbach Alpha method. The results were 0.91, 0.85 and 0.79 for crlusters B, C, and D respectively with overall index of 0.87. Frequency count and percentage were used to answer research question 1, while mean and standard deviation were used to answer research questions 2, 3 and 4. The three null hypotheses were tested using analysis of variance and supported using Scheffe’s test. The major findings include Qualifications of supervisors of instruction are to a very great extent (90.54%) in line with Supervisors’ guidelines; frequency of supervisory visits to secondary schools is to a great extent (2.98 ± 0.68) in line with Supervisors’ guidelines; supervisors to a great extent (2.90 ± 0.65) adopt supervision techniques in carrying out their assignments in line with Supervisors’ guidelines; and supervisors to a less extent (2.15 ± 0.71) observe teachers in the classroom during supervision in line with Supervisors’ guidelines. From the findings, four recommendations are put forth, one of which is that Government should sponsor workshops, seminars, symposia and various in-service training programmes for the supervisors to update their knowledge and skills. <br></p>
Project Overview