Performance management and employee productivity of selected manufacturing companies in lagos state, nigeria
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Theoretical Framework
- 2.2Historical Overview
- 2.3Conceptual Framework
- 2.4Performance Management Theories
- 2.5Employee Productivity Models
- 2.6Factors Affecting Employee Productivity
- 2.7Performance Management Practices in Manufacturing Companies
- 2.8Employee Productivity in the Manufacturing Sector
- 2.9Role of Leadership in Performance Management
- 2.10Technology and Employee Productivity
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design
- 3.2Population and Sampling
- 3.3Data Collection Methods
- 3.4Research Instruments
- 3.5Data Analysis Techniques
- 3.6Ethical Considerations
- 3.7Pilot Study
- 3.8Data Validation and Reliability
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Data Analysis and Interpretation
- 4.2Demographic Analysis of Respondents
- 4.3Performance Management Practices Analysis
- 4.4Employee Productivity Assessment
- 4.5Correlation Analysis
- 4.6Regression Analysis
- 4.7Findings Discussion
- 4.8Implications for Manufacturing Companies
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Recommendations
- 5.4Contributions to Knowledge
- 5.5Areas for Future Research
Project Abstract
<p> </p><p>The level of employee productivity in Nigerian organizations has been on the decline over the years and this could be ascribed to poor performance management strategies put in place by these manufacturing firms. It is in light of this, that this study aims to examine the effect of performance management on employee productivity among Nigerian manufacturing firms.</p><p>Descriptive survey research design was adopted for the study. The population was 6026 comprising of the entire staff of five selected manufacturing companies in Lagos State. Taro Yamane formula was used to derive the sample size of 490. A structured questionnaire was administered resulting in a response rate of 97.5%. The instrument was validated and the Cronbachβs Alpha used for the Pre-test Reliability Analysis of the major constructs ranged between 0.778 and 0.879. The data gathered was analyzed with the aid of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 software involving frequency distributions, linear and multiple regressions.</p><p>Findings showed that indeed the four context of performance management had a significant effect on employee productivity. Detailed simple linear regression analysis showed that performance appraisal (F = 39.60, R Square = 0.077, <em>P < 0.05</em>) at 7.7%; performance feedback (F = 142.726, R Square = 0.231, <em>P < 0.05</em>) at 23.1%; employee training (F = 7.803, R Square = 0.016, <em>P < 0.05</em>) at 1.6% and compensation (F = 297.643, R Square = 0.385, <em>P < 0.05</em>) at 38.5% had a significant effect with employee productivity, however, performance feedback and compensation had the strongest relationship on employee productivity; multiple regression analysis also showed performance management (F = 79.482, R Square = 0.402, <em>P < 0.05</em>) at 40.2% had significant effect on employee productivity.</p><p>The study concluded that Performance Management when well implemented improves employee productivity especially when more emphasis is placed on positive feedback and compensation which was proven to have a higher influence on productivity of employees. It was recommended, among others, that manufacturing firms should encourage their members of staff by giving them regular positive feedback and compensate them fairly to improve productivity.</p><p><strong>Keywords </strong>Performance management, Employee productivity, Performance appraisal, Feedback Training, Compensation, Manufacturing firms.</p> <br><p></p>
Project Overview