Effects of crude oil on some bacteria and mineral constituents of rhizosphere of delonix regia hook.
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Bacteria and Rhizosphere
- 2.2Effects of Crude Oil on Bacteria
- 2.3Role of Delonix Regia Hook in Rhizosphere
- 2.4Mineral Constituents in Rhizosphere
- 2.5Interactions between Bacteria and Minerals
- 2.6Crude Oil Contamination in Soil
- 2.7Impact of Crude Oil on Soil Microorganisms
- 2.8Studies on Delonix Regia Hook
- 2.9Rhizosphere Ecology
- 2.10Previous Research on Similar Topics
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design
- 3.2Sampling Methods
- 3.3Data Collection Techniques
- 3.4Experimental Setup
- 3.5Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.6Variables and Measurements
- 3.7Ethical Considerations
- 3.8Research Limitations
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Analysis of Bacterial Populations
- 4.2Mineral Content Analysis
- 4.3Effects of Crude Oil Exposure
- 4.4Relationship between Bacteria and Minerals
- 4.5Comparison with Control Group
- 4.6Interpretation of Results
- 4.7Discussion on Findings
- 4.8Implications for Future Research
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Recommendations
- 5.4Contribution to Knowledge
- 5.5Areas for Future Research
Project Abstract
<p> Crude oil spill is hazardous to soil and subsequently affects food production. Certain plants however tolerate and/or improve the mineral deficiency imposed by crude oil. Also, due to the ability of bacteria to degrade crude oil, plants that enhance the abundance of soil bacteria under pollution have been under investigation. The effects of crude oil on the bacterial count and mineral constituents of soil rhizosphere of Delonixregia were investigated. The effects of D. regia on total bacterial count and mineral constituents were tested. A total of 96 polythene bags were filled, each with 18 kg of soil. Four soil bags each containing a seedling of D. regia and four without seedlingwere polluted with 30 ml of crude oil. This was repeated using 150 ml and 750 ml of crude oilwhile the control was not polluted. The experiment was set up in 3 replicates in a completely randomized design. After one month, the soil bacterial count and mineral composition were analyzed using standard techniques. Bacterial analysis was repeated after the second and third month of pollution. Some vegetative parameters were taken before and after pollution. The results of the 1st and 2nd bacterial counts revealed a significant (P<0.05) increase in soils treated with 750 ml of crude oil but a rdecrease in bacterial count of soil treated with 30 ml and 150 ml crude oil compared with the control. The results of the 3rd count revealed significant (P<0.05) decrease in polluted soils compared to the control. Identified bacteria include Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Proteus and Micrococcus species. Bacterial count was slightly higher in unvegetated soil than in the vegetated one. Polluted soil depicted a significant (P<0.05) increase in cation exchange capacity, carbon and organic matter contents but a decrease in pH, available phosphorus and % nitrogen compared to the control. Carbon and organic matter contents as well as % nitrogen were reduced in vegetated soils compared to the unvegetated soil. There were significant differences in sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium among different treatments and between the unvegetated and vegetated soils at different levels of significance. The bacterial count was influenced by crude oil concentration, duration of the pollutant, presence of D. regia and some mineral constituents in the soil. <br></p>
Project Overview