PROBIOTIC EFFECTS OF SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIA ON LAYING CHICKEN FED PALM KERNEL CAKE-BASED DIETS.
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Probiotics
- 2.2Importance of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
- 2.3Role of Probiotics in Poultry Nutrition
- 2.4Effects of Probiotics on Laying Chickens
- 2.5Palm Kernel Cake as Poultry Feed
- 2.6Nutritional Composition of Palm Kernel Cake
- 2.7Use of Probiotics in Poultry Feeds
- 2.8Studies on Saccharomyces Cerevisiae in Poultry
- 2.9Comparison of Probiotic Strains
- 2.10Probiotic Administration Methods
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design
- 3.2Sampling Methods
- 3.3Data Collection Procedures
- 3.4Data Analysis Techniques
- 3.5Ethical Considerations
- 3.6Research Validity and Reliability
- 3.7Limitations of the Methodology
- 3.8Researcher Bias
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Probiotic Effects on Laying Chickens
- 4.3Comparison of Diets with and without Probiotics
- 4.4Impact of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae on Egg Production
- 4.5Effect on Egg Quality
- 4.6Health Benefits for Chickens
- 4.7Economic Considerations
- 4.8Recommendations for Future Research
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Implications of the Study
- 5.4Contributions to Knowledge
- 5.5Recommendations for Practitioners
- 5.6Areas for Future Research
Project Abstract
<p> Five layers from each treatment group were randomly selected at the 70th week in lay, slaughtered and their gastrointestinal tract (GIT) carefully removed. The weight and length of the different sections of the gastrointestinal tract were determined. At the 24th month of age, another set of 5 layers were randomly selected from each group and used to evaluate the carcass quality. Repeat measure and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to analyze the results. Variant means were separated using Duncanβs new multiple range test. Significance was accepted at p< 0.05. Group C birds had significantly (p<05) higher mean live weight than the group D birds (control). The PCV of group C birds was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those of all other groups at weeks 9 and 15 of age. The group C birds also had significantly higher (p<0.05) TLC and lymphocytes counts than the control group (D). Apparent digestibility coefficient of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein and crude fibre were significantly (p<0.05) higher in the probiotic supplemented groups than the control. Group C had an overall significantly (p<0.05) higher hen-day egg performance of followed by groups B and A, while group D had the least hen-day egg performance. Birds in the supplemented groups had significantly higher (p<0.05) serum total proteins and significantly lower serum cholesterol when compared to the control. Eggs from the supplemented groups had significantly (p<0.05) lower cholesterol content when compared to the control. Group C birds had a significantly (p<0.05) longer colon than the control. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in egg qualities (egg size, egg weight and shell thickness) between the supplemented groups and the control. The economic returns from sale of eggs was significantly higher (p<0.05) in group C birds in the first year of lay, but in the second year of lay, all supplemented groups had significantly higher (p<0.05) monthly revenue from eggs compared to the control. It was concluded that supplementation with probiotic S. cerevisiae significantly (p<0.05) enhanced pullet development, hen-day egg performance and monthly revenue from eggs, and significantly (p<0.05) lowered serum and egg cholesterol levels. The probiotic supplementation was most effective at the level of 1.0 g/kg of feed, and this is recommended. <br></p>
Project Overview