Bioappraisal of different non-antibiotic growth enhancers using broilers
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Non-antibiotic Growth Enhancers
- 2.2Effects of Probiotics on Broiler Growth
- 2.3Impact of Prebiotics on Broiler Health
- 2.4Herbal Additives in Broiler Nutrition
- 2.5Enzymes as Growth Enhancers in Broilers
- 2.6Effect of Organic Acids on Broiler Performance
- 2.7Role of Essential Oils in Broiler Growth
- 2.8Benefits of Plant Extracts in Broiler Production
- 2.9Comparing Non-antibiotic Growth Enhancers
- 2.10Summary of Literature Review
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Methodology Overview
- 3.2Research Design and Approach
- 3.3Sampling Techniques
- 3.4Data Collection Methods
- 3.5Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.6Statistical Tools Used
- 3.7Ethical Considerations
- 3.8Limitations of Research Methodology
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Research Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Probiotics Effect on Broilers
- 4.3Results of Prebiotics Impact on Broiler Health
- 4.4Findings on Herbal Additives in Broiler Nutrition
- 4.5Enzymes Effect on Broiler Growth
- 4.6Organic Acids Impact on Broiler Performance
- 4.7Essential Oils Influence on Broiler Growth
- 4.8Plant Extracts Benefits in Broiler Production
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Conclusion and Summary of Findings
Project Abstract
<p> A sixty three (63) day experiment was carried out to bio-appraise different non-antibiotic growth enhancers using one hundred and twenty day-old broiler chicks (DOC). The DOC were randomly assigned to four treatments of 30 birds per group, each with three replications (10 birds per replicate), in a completely randomized design (CRD). T1 served as the control (CT), whereas T2, T3 and T4 had commercially procured ElRox (EX), PolaMix (PX) and MaxiGrowth (MX) growth promoters incorporated at 400g/100kg, 500g/100kg and 600g/100kg respectively. Data were collected weekly on body weight, body weight gain, daily feed intake, feed conversion ratio, protein efficiency ratio and feed cost per Kg gain. Carcass yields of the experimental groups were also evaluated at the end of the experiment. Biochemical parameters of the bird were also determined at the end of the experiment. These were protein profile, liver enzymes, bilirubin, lipid profile and serum arsenics. Results of this study showed that the non-antibiotic growth enhancers used in the study had a significant (P<0.05) effect on the performance characteristics of the experimental birds. The birds that received ElRox (T2) had better results in the overall performance indices of the experimental animals, including feed cost/Kg gain. Birds on the ElRox inpr-feed diet had significantly (P<0.05) the best edible meat parts. However, there was no significant (P>0.05) difference in the liver enzymes and bilirubin levels. Effect of treatments on the serum arsenic levels was significant (P<0.05). It was higher in the birds that consumed in-feed MaxiGrowth. Treatments effects on the protein profile of the birds were significant (P<0.05). Birds on control diet had the highest protein level while those on the PolaMix had the least. The urea and creatinine levels were not significantly (P>0.05) affected by treatments. In the same vein, lipid profile (CHOL, HDL, VLDL, and TRIG) were also not significantly (P>0.05) affected except LDL. The highest level of LDL was recorded in birds on the control diet, with PolaMix as the least. The results of the overall experiment indicated that, of all the non-antibiotic growth enhancers examined, only ElRox promoted a significant weight increase with better cost benefit return. It is concluded that feeding ElRox (400g/100kg) to broilers resulted in better performance of the birds. <br></p>
Project Overview