ANTHROPOMETRIC COMPARISM OF CEPHALIC INDICES BETWEEN YORUBA AND BENIN ETHNIC GROUPS RESIDING IN OKADA TOWN, EDO STATE
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Anthropometry and Cephalic Indices: A Review
- 2.2Anthropometric Measurements in Anthropology
- 2.3Historical Development of Cephalic Indices
- 2.4Yoruba Ethnic Group Anthropometric Characteristics
- 2.5Benin Ethnic Group Anthropometric Characteristics
- 2.6Comparative Anthropometric Studies
- 2.7Importance of Cephalic Indices in Anthropometry
- 2.8Methodologies for Anthropometric Measurements
- 2.9Anthropometry in Forensic Science
- 2.10Anthropometry in Health Sciences
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Methodology Overview
- 3.2Study Design and Sampling Techniques
- 3.3Data Collection Procedures
- 3.4Data Analysis Methods
- 3.5Reliability and Validity Measures
- 3.6Ethical Considerations in Research
- 3.7Statistical Software Utilization
- 3.8Interpretation of Results
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Analysis of Cephalic Indices Data
- 4.2Comparison of Anthropometric Characteristics
- 4.3Correlation of Cephalic Indices with Demographic Factors
- 4.4Gender-Based Analysis of Cephalic Indices
- 4.5Discussion on Ethnic Variation in Cephalic Indices
- 4.6Factors Influencing Cephalic Indices Measurements
- 4.7Implications of Cephalic Indices Findings
- 4.8Recommendations for Further Research
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Conclusion and Summary
- 5.2Recapitulation of Research Objectives
- 5.3Key Findings and Contributions
- 5.4Practical Applications of Study
- 5.5Limitations and Future Research Directions
Project Abstract
Anthropometry is a fundamental tool in physical anthropology, providing insights into human biological variations. This study aimed to compare cephalic indices between the Yoruba and Benin ethnic groups residing in Okada town, Edo State. Cephalic index is a ratio obtained by multiplying the maximum width of the head by 100 and dividing it by the maximum length of the head. The study sample consisted of 200 individuals (100 Yoruba and 100 Benin) aged between 18 and 60 years. Measurements were taken using standard anthropometric techniques. The results revealed significant differences in cephalic indices between the two ethnic groups. The Yoruba group had a mean cephalic index of X.XX, while the Benin group had a mean cephalic index of X.XX. These findings suggest distinct cranial morphologies between the Yoruba and Benin populations in Okada town. Further studies incorporating larger sample sizes and additional anthropometric parameters are recommended to deepen the understanding of cranial variations among different ethnic groups in Nigeria.
Project Overview
<p>
</p><p><strong>INTRODUCTION</strong></p><p><strong>BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY</strong></p><p>Anthropometry deals with the measurement of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.modishproject.com/ethnic-militias-nationalism-nigeria-comparative/">physical sizes and shapes</a> of human body (D. Poswillo, 1963). In <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.modishproject.com/framing-broadcasts-indigenous/">differentiating people</a> of different ethnic backgrounds, nutritional status, and gender, according to G. V. Shah and H. R. Jahhav, 2004, anthropometric data seems to be useful. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.modishproject.com/quality-acceptability-microbial-2/">Several measurable anthropometric</a> parameters or variables have been developed over the years for establishing possible differences amongst different groups (G. V. Shah and H. R. Jahhav., 2004).</p><p>According to G. V. Shah and H. R. Jahhav (2004), S. W. Lobo, T. S. Chandrashekhar, and S. Kumar (2005), M.J.Golalipour (2006), Cephalic index is one of such very useful measurable anthropometric variables used in physical anthropology to determine geographical gender, age, and racial and ethnic variations. They proved that comparison of changes in cephalic index between parents, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.modishproject.com/solid-waste-management/">offspring, and siblings</a> gives clues to genetic transmission of inherited characters or traits which play a role in forensic science. Argyropoulos and Sassouni(1989) showed that morphological features of different races and ethnic groups are not randomly distributed but appear in geographic clusters. Arguably, Cephalometry continues to be the most versatile technique in the investigation of the<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.modishproject.com/phosphorus-grain-yield/"> craniofacial skeleton</a> because of its validity and practicality (G. T. McIntyre and P. A. Mossey, 2003). Cephalometry is associated with the morphological study of all the structures present in the human head. Cephalometry is the scientific measurement of the dimensions of the head usually through the use of standardized lateral skull radiographs (I. EI-Feghi et al, 2004). Based on the above factors, anthropometric studies are <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.modishproject.com/religious-conflicts-nigeria-solutions/">conducted on the age, sex</a>, and social or ethnic groups in certain geographical zones (G. V. Shah and H. R. Jahhav, [2004], P. Williams et al, [2003], M.J.Golalipour et al, [2003], M.J.Golalipour et al, [2005], B. C. Didia and D. V. Dapper, [2005], S. H. Garba, [2008], H. B. Fawehinmi and A. M. Eroje, [2009], O. Joy et al, [2009], G. S. Oladipo et al, [2009], G. S. Oladipo et al, [2013]). Several studies have been conducted on the age,sex,and racial or ethnic groups in <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.modishproject.com/breed-age-sex-growth-haematological-serum/">different geographical zones (O. Joy et al, [2009]</a>, G. S. Oladipo et al, [2009], G. S. Oladipo et al, [2013], I. P. Singh and N. K. Bharin, [1968], E. A. Osunwoke et al, [2012]).These authors have sited various categories of cranium on the basis of head length, breadth, and index and described seven groups of crania. R. F. Okupe et al. (1984), in a comparative study of bi parietal diameter (BPD) fetuses of some of the Nigerian ethnic groups and Caucasians, showed statistically significant differences until near term when the Nigerian fetuses showed <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.modishproject.com/cultural-analysis-security-ethnic/">consistently longer BPD</a>. Cussenot et al. (1990) reported that skeletal measurements were made as the basis of foetal anthropometry and age determination. In a related study, cephalic index varied with advancing gestational age with the highest and lowest being 81.5 and 78.0 at weeks 14 and 28, respectively (D. L. Gray, 1989).</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.modishproject.com/investigation-influence-prevalence-poultry/">Several studies</a> have been carried out to classify head shapes based on cephalic index into four internationally acceptable categories that include dolicocephalic (<74.9), mesocephalic (75–79.9), brachycephalic (80.0–84.9), and hyperbrachycephalic (85.0–89.9) (P. Williams et al, [2003], M. Del Sol, [2005]). A study has shown that the people of Gurung community of Nepal of India are brachycephalic with cephalic index of 80.42 (G. V. Shah and H. R. Jahhav 2004). Bhils and Barelas are mesocephalic (76.98 & 79.80) (I. Bhargava and G. A. Kher, [1960], I. Bhargava and G. A. Kher[1961]). The Iranian people are predominantly <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.modishproject.com/impact-nigerian-national-theater-vehicle/">brachycephalic and hyper brachycephalic</a> (M.J.Golalipour, 2006). Besides being a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.modishproject.com/language-culture-tool/">predictor of fetal death</a>, early trans-vaginal measurement of cephalic index had been used for the determination of Down syndrome foetuses (P. Rosati and L. Guariglia 1999). The first classification based on cranial morphology is attributed to the professor of anatomy Anders Retzius (1840).</p><p> </p>
<br><p></p>