SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF FOOD SECURITY AMONG SELECTED ETHNIC GROUPS IN NORTH CENTRAL NIGERIA
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Understanding Food Security
- 2.2Theoretical Frameworks on Food Security
- 2.3Global Perspectives on Food Security
- 2.4Food Security Policies and Programs
- 2.5Socio-Economic Factors Affecting Food Security
- 2.6Cultural Influences on Food Security
- 2.7Food Security Challenges and Solutions
- 2.8Technology and Innovation in Food Security
- 2.9Gender Perspectives on Food Security
- 2.10Climate Change and Food Security
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Design and Methodology
- 3.2Population and Sampling Techniques
- 3.3Data Collection Methods
- 3.4Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.5Ethical Considerations
- 3.6Validity and Reliability
- 3.7Limitations of the Methodology
- 3.8Research Instruments Used
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Demographic Profile of Selected Ethnic Groups
- 4.2Food Consumption Patterns
- 4.3Access to Food Resources
- 4.4Food Security Indicators
- 4.5Socio-Economic Factors Impacting Food Security
- 4.6Cultural Practices and Food Security
- 4.7Comparison of Food Security Among Ethnic Groups
- 4.8Policy Implications and Recommendations
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Recommendations for Future Research
- 5.4Implications for Policy and Practice
- 5.5Contributions to Knowledge
Project Abstract
The broad objective of the study was to investigate the socio-economic andcultural dimensions of food security among selected ethnic groups in North CentralNigeria. Specifically, the study was designed to determine food culture and practices ofthe respondents; determine the household food security status (energy availability) acrossethnic groups; determine dietary diversity of the households across cultures; identifyperceived constraints militating against household food security; and describe the copingstrategies utilized by the households during food shortages. Seven hypotheses and aconceptual framework were developed for the study. The population of the study consistsof all ethnic groups in North Central Nigeria. The zone comprises about 60 ethnic groups.Specifically, the study was carried out among Tiv, Igala and Eggon ethnic groups ofBenue, Kogi and Nasarawa States. A multi-stage sampling technique was adopted for thestudy. Three ethnic groups (Tiv, Igala and Eggon) and one village per ethnic group werepurposively selected based on differences in language and culture. The total sample sizefor this study was 340 respondents, made up of 120 Tiv households, 108 Igala householdsand 112 Eggon households. Data for the study were collected through the use of interviewschedule.The data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean score, food securityindex, factor analysis; the comparative (reduced) coping strategy index (CSI), logitregression, Kruskal-Wallis (H) statistic and correlation. The study revealed that majority(91.2%) of the respondents were males. The mean age of the respondents was 43.36 yearswhile their mean household size was 5 members. The mean farm size of the respondentswas 3.3 hectares while their average fertilizer use was 4.73kg/ha per annum. Majority(53.2%) had no formal education; majority (89.4%) had no access to credit and about53.2% did not participate in non-farm activities. The average output from own productionwas 6211.79kg and majority (60%) of the respondents possessed goats. The mean farmincome; mean non-farm income and average annual household income for therespondents were 69,539.00 naira; 22,486.00 naira and 91,752.00 naira, respectively.Majority (93.2%) of husbands took decisions on household agricultural activities; allrespondents practiced subsistence farming; and 94.7% practiced mixed cropping.Majority (88.6%) of the respondents preferred major crops; about 92.5% acquiredfarmland through inheritance; and the family (67. %) constituted the main source oflabour. Majority of the respondents used traditional processing (97.4%) and storage(96.2%) methods. Majority (95.4%) of husbands controlled household income
Project Overview