RESOURCE USE EFFICIENCY AMONG FADAMA CROP FARMERS IN IBADAN/IBARAPA AGRICULTURAL ZONE OF OYO STATE, NIGERIA
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Overview of Resource Use Efficiency
- 2.2Conceptual Framework
- 2.3Factors Affecting Resource Use Efficiency
- 2.4Empirical Studies on Resource Use Efficiency
- 2.5Technology Adoption and Resource Use Efficiency
- 2.6Sustainable Agricultural Practices and Resource Use Efficiency
- 2.7Role of Government Policies in Resource Use Efficiency
- 2.8Challenges in Achieving Resource Use Efficiency
- 2.9Innovations in Resource Use Efficiency
- 2.10Summary of Literature Review
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Methodology Overview
- 3.2Research Design
- 3.3Population and Sampling Techniques
- 3.4Data Collection Methods
- 3.5Data Analysis Techniques
- 3.6Questionnaire Design
- 3.7Validity and Reliability of Instruments
- 3.8Ethical Considerations
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Data Presentation and Description
- 4.2Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Respondents
- 4.3Farming Practices and Resource Use Efficiency
- 4.4Technology Adoption Patterns
- 4.5Challenges Faced by Farmers in Resource Use Efficiency
- 4.6Government Interventions and Resource Use Efficiency
- 4.7Comparison of Resource Use Efficiency Across Farm Sizes
- 4.8Summary of Findings
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusion
- 5.3Recommendations for Policy
- 5.4Suggestions for Further Research
- 5.5Implications for Agricultural Development
Project Abstract
The study investigated the resource use efficiency among Fadama crop farmers in IbadanIbarapa agricultural zone of Oyo state, Nigeria. Data were collected from 120 respondents whowere randomly selected and interviewed using both interview schedule and questionnaire. Thedata collected were presented using percentage and means. The findings o revealed that therewas no significant difference in the productivity between Fadama and non fadama (soko)farmers, while there was a significant difference between the productivity of Fadama and nonfadama (watermelon) farmers as well as Fadama and non fadama maize farmers.The grossmargin analysis of Fadama and non Fadama crop farmers revealed that Fadama soko farmers andFadama maize farmers were more profitable than the non Fadama farmers in the area. Forwatermelon, the non fadama farmers were more profitable because they had higher output. Thefindings also revealed that labour, fertilizer, insecticides and seed influenced the technicalefficiency of soko farmers. Herbicides and insecticides influenced the technical efficiency ofwatermelon farmers, while labour, insecticide and seed influenced the technical efficiency ofmaize farmers. The positive coefficient for age variable implies that the older farmers were moretechnically inefficient than theyounger ones. Also negative coefficient for education implies thatthe farmers level of technicalinefficiency declined with more education. With regards to farmerspecificfactors, especially education, there is the need for policyto promote formal education asa means of enhancing efficiency in production over the long-term period. This is because itwould enable farmers make better technical decision and also help in allocatingtheir productioninputs effectively.In the short-term, informal extension education could beeffective, especiallywhen targeted at farmers who have had limited formal educationalopportunities.The coefficientof farming experience was estimated to be negative as expected andstatistically significant at the5-percent level. The implication is that farmers with more years offarming experience tend to bemore efficient in crop production. It is possible that such farmers gained more years offarmingexperience through “learning by doing,†and thereby becoming more efficient.The studyalso found that farmers under Fadama harvested more per unit ofland of output of crop thannonfadama farmers for soko and maizeand this confirms the hypothesis that programmeintervention has the capacity to succor farm production problems while accruing more income tofarmers.
Project Overview