THE IMPACT OF FISCAL POLICIES AS A TOOL FOR STABILIZING A DEVELOPING ECONOMY (NIGERIAN EXPERIENCE 2006-2011)
Table Of Contents
- <p> </p><p>Title page</p><p>Declaration of<br>page</p><p>Certification</p><p>Abstract</p><p>Table of<br>content.</p><p><strong>
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- </strong></p><p><strong>
- 1.0INTRODUCTION</strong></p><ol><li>Background of the study<ol><li>Statement of the problem</li></ol><ol><li>Objectives of the study</li></ol><ol><li>Scope and limitation of the study</li></ol><ol><li>Significance of the study</li></ol><ol><li>Definition of terms.</li></ol></li></ol><p><strong>
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- </strong></p><p><strong>
- 2.0LITERATURE REVIEW</strong></p><ul><li>History of fiscal policies in the Nigeria pre-independence<ul><li>Definition and meaning of fiscal policies</li></ul><ul><li>Difference between fiscal and monetary policies</li></ul><ul><li>Tax as a tool of fiscal policy</li></ul><ul><li>Expenditure in fiscal policy</li></ul><ul><li>Tax and expenditure in fiscal policy</li></ul><ul><li>Limitation of fiscal policy implementation</li></ul><ul><li>The role of the central bank in the formulation and implementation of<br>fiscal policy.</li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- </strong></p><ul><li>Introduction<ul><li>Research design for the study</li></ul><ul><li>Population and sample size</li></ul><ul><li>Design and administration of questionnaires</li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- </strong></p><p><strong>
- 4.0PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS &<br>INTERPRETATION OF DATA</strong></p><ul><li>Introduction<ul><li>Presentation of data for 2006 fiscal year</li></ul><ul><li>Analysis of data for 2006 through 2008 fiscal year</li></ul><ul><li>Analysis of the federal government revenue and expenditure of<br>2006-2011</li></ul><ul><li>Analysis of the state of the economy (2006 – 2011)</li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- </strong></p><p><strong>
- 5.0SUMMARY<br>AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.</strong></p><p>Questionnaire sample.</p><p>Bibliography</p> <br><p></p>
Project Abstract
<p> </p><p>This<br>research work was undertaken in order to evaluate the impact of Fiscal policies<br>as a tool for stabilizing a Nigerian economy. A major issue in Nigerian economy<br>recovery relates to the prospect of adoption of the most relevant fiscal<br>policies in its economy. In view of this, the researcher addressed the<br>following problems to be curbed in this research study.</p><ol><li>Lack of required component of fiscal policies</li><li>Inconsistency in the use of fiscal policies.</li><li>Improper implementation of fiscal policies</li><li>Inability of the country to improve on existing<br>fiscal policies.</li></ol><p>Due to the<br>nature of this research work, ordinary method of data analysis and interval<br>method were used. Both primary and secondary data were used. Secondary data<br>were gotten from Newspapers and magazines, textbooks, journals and periodicals<br>etc. questionnaires were used in generating primary data.</p><p>From the<br>analysis made, the researcher discovered that between 1998 and 2000 fiscal<br>years, the country has witnessed many changes in its fiscal policies which are<br>hinged on the combination techniques applied on the components of fiscal<br>policies, the mode of implementation of fiscal policies and the degree of<br>success in the implementation of process.</p><p>Based on the findings made in this research study, the researcher<br>recommends that the country should embark on the following in order to develop<br>its economy.</p><ol><li>The depreciation of naira must be urgently<br>considered.</li><li>There should be stream – lining of activities of<br>certain government amend agencies</li><li>The government should make further fiscal<br>adjustments.</li></ol> <br><p></p>
Project Overview
<p>
</p><p><strong>1.0 INTRODUCTION</strong></p><p><strong>1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY</strong></p><p> The economy of any country, irrespective<br>of its structure is regulated by certain policies developed by the government.<br>Some of these include economic policies, social policies, monetary policies<br>etc. however of all these policies economic policies are most fundamental. The<br>economic factors are cynical because they serve as a foundation for the success<br>of the other policies of government. The constituent element of these economic<br>policies need to be manipulated simultaneously to achieve the desired results.<br>The techniques of manipulating the economic factors play an important role two.<br>One of the essential arms of economic policies – the fiscal policy, serve as a<br>means of planning, organizing, controlling and coordinating the tempo of<br>activities in the economy. Fiscal policy in itself can be said to be made up of<br>specific course of action involving the formulation of tax structure and<br>expenditure patterns. The direction of these expenditures and taxes are<br>specific in nature for results or changes. Before the world war, fiscal policy<br>as a key to economic restructuring and development has been in existence. Many<br>economists had propounded theories as a means to economic prosperity from the<br>destruction of the world war, but in the early 20the century, Lord John Keynes<br>put forward on articulated and constructive solution to solving economic<br>problem. Lord Keynes in his book explain that the revamping of an economy could<br>be achieved through the redirection of government expenditures from war<br>machines to soft loans to increase investment, generate employment and<br>consequently increase aggregate demand as a means of getting hold on the<br>hyperinflation that existed after the Second World War.</p><p> In Nigeria, the earliest known forms of<br>fiscal policies were used. It was established as far back as 19th century by<br>the British Administration. Then the political system became complex due to the<br>existence of the indigenous government under Emirs, Obas, Obongs, Obis etc.<br>along with the colonial masters. In effect, payment for the administration of<br>the country were made to the British government.</p><p> The government policy used by the<br>colonial masters on revenue for development was adopted from Dr. Earl Grey<br>report (1852) in which he advocated economic development amongst civilized<br>people. Through self determination under the British supervision. Because of<br>the existence of local authorities which led to indirect rule policy, the<br>policy suited Nigeria. The revenue generation method which was based on duties<br>paid on imported goods was pursued because it avoided disruption of the<br>indigenous social and economic system and its incidence did not directly affect<br>the average Nigerian. Besides, revenue from duties the British government<br>support however, began to dwindle due to increase public criticism in Britain<br>against spreading of Brutish influence in West Africa. 1870, the government<br>supplement stopped and was reduced from #5,000.00 to #2,000.00 to #1,000.00 in<br>1862, 1863 and 1865 respectively. The expenditure was solely directed towards<br>improving the comfort of the British officers and the maintenance of law and<br>orders. These and then. The revenue and expenditure volume also increase<br>considerably well into the 20th century. Considering this modern time, fiscal<br>policy as a means of economic development are not developed in isolation. They<br>are formulated and implemented simultaneously with monetary policies, foreign<br>policies by the government with the aim of having a synchronized approach in<br>tackling economic problems. The generally accepted fiscal policy measure<br>incorporates welfare economics as a means of reducing adverse effects that may<br>arise thus reducing the standard of living of the citizens of the country.</p><p> From the foregoing, this research is aimed at identifying the role of fiscal policies in the development of Nigerian economy.</p>
<br><p></p>