The effect of merger and acquisition on the growth of an organization (study of oando)
Table Of Contents
- <p> <b><b></b></b></p><p><b><b>Cover<br>page – – – – – – – – – i</b></b></p><p><b><b>Title<br>page – – – – – – – – – – ii</b></b></p><p><b><b>Declaration – – – – – – – – – – iii</b></b></p><p><b><b>Approval<br>page – – – – – – – – – iv</b></b></p><p><b><b>Dedication – – – – – – – – – – v</b></b></p><p><b><b>Acknowledgement – – – – – – – – vi</b></b></p><p><b><b>Abstract – – – – – – – – – – viii</b></b></p><p><b><b>Table<br>of content – – – – – – – – – ix</b></b></p><p><b><b><b>
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- – Introduction</b></b></b></p><p><b><b><b></b></b></b></p><b><b><b><p>
- 1.0 Background of the study – – – – – – 1</p><p>
- 1.1 Historical Background of Oando Nigeria Plc – – – 3</p><p>
- 1.2 Statement of the general problem – – – – – 5</p><p>
- 1.3 Objective of the study – – – – – – – 6</p><p>
- 1.4 Significance of the study – – – – – – 8</p><p>
- 1.5 Research question – – – – – – – 9</p><p>
- 1.6 Statement of hypothesis – – – – – – 10</p><p>
- 1.7 Scope and limitation of the study – – – – – 10</p><p>
- 1.8 Definition of terms – – – – – – – 12</p><p><b> </b></p><p><b></b></p><b><p><b>
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- – Review of Related Literature</b></p><p>
- 2.0 Introduction – – – – – – – – 14</p><p>
- 2.1 Merger and Acquisition definitions – – – – – 14</p><p>
- 2.2 Types of Merger – – – – – – – – 16</p><p>
- 2.3 Strategies for business survival – – – – – 18</p><p>
- 2.4 Motive behind merger and acquisition – – – – 19</p><p>
- 2.5 Reason for merger and acquisition preference<br>over</p><p> investment in new business generated<br>from scratch – – 23</p><p>
- 2.6 Procedure for effective merger – – – – – 26</p><p>
- 2.7 Method of financing merger – – – – – – 28</p><p>
- 2.8 Merger and acquisition investment banking – – – 31</p><p>
- 2.9 Merger and acquisition market place<br>difficulties – – 32 </p><p>
- 2.10The effect of merger and acquisition – – – – 35</p><p>
- 2.11Legal issues in M & A – – – – – – – 36</p><p>
- 2.12Regulation of M & A in Nigeria – – – – – 37</p><p>
- 2.13Summary of the review – – – – – – – 40</p><p><b> </b></p><p><b></b></p><b><p><b>
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- </b></p><p><b></b></p><b><p><b>RESEARCH METHODOLOGY</b></p><p>
- 3.0 Introduction- – – – – – – – – 42</p><p>
- 3.1 Area of study – – – – – – – – 42</p><p>
- 3.2 Research design – – – – – – – – 43</p><p>
- 3.3 Research population – – – – – – – 43</p><p>
- 3.4 Sample and sampling technique – – – – – 44</p><p>
- 3.5 Data collection instruments – – – – – – 44</p><p>
- 3.6 Data collection method – – – – – – – 46</p><p>
- 3.7 Validity and reliability of the instrument – – – – 46</p><p>
- 3.8 Administration of research instruments – – – – 47</p><p>
- 3.9 Techniques of data analysis (mode) – – – – 47</p><p><b>
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- – Presentation and Analysis of<br>Data</b></p><p><b></b></p><b><p>
- 4.0 Introduction – – – – – – – – 49</p><p>
- 4.1 Respondent characteristic and classification – – – 49</p><p>
- 4.2 Presentation and Analysis of data – – – – – 50</p><p>
- 4.3 Testing of hypothesis – – – – – – – 58</p><p>
- 4.4 Summary of findings – – – – – – – 60</p><p><b>
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- – Summary, Conclusion and<br>Recommendation</b></p><p>
- 5.0 Introduction – – – – – – – – 62</p><p>
- 5.1 Summary – – – – – – – – 62</p><p>
- 5.2 Conclusion – – – – – – – – – 65</p><p>
- 5.3 Recommendations – – – – – – – 65</p><p> Bibliography – – – – – – – – – 68</p><p> Appendix</p></b></b></b></b></b></b></b> <br><p></p>
Project Abstract
<p> Merger<br>and acquisition has been widely acclaimed by scholars and professionals in<br>business as the most desirable and effective strategy to revive the difficult<br>situations facing Nigeria<br>economic climate. The situation is so terrible that organizations had to turn<br>around and adopt strategy to survive through this turbulent water. This research work has the objective<br>undertaking to examines, analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of merger and<br>acquisitions as a strategy for organizational survival in Nigeria and<br>investigates whether it can result to economic of scale and increase<br>profitability of the combined firms. To this end, questionnaire were<br>administrated to Oando Nigeria Plc and some few other organizations that<br>merged. The data and information collected were analyzed using simple tables,<br>frequencies and percentages. The findings of this research reveals that merger<br>and acquisitions brings about improve in the productivity of the emerged<br>organizations. The researcher is of the opinion that, based on the findings,<br>the recommendations made if properly followed, it will improve the activities<br>of merger and acquisition for the benefit of the government, proposing<br>organizations and the interested public at large. <br></p>
Project Overview
<p>
<b><b></b></b></p><p><b><b><b>INTRODUCTION</b></b></b></p><p><b><b><b></b></b></b></p><b><b><b><p><b>1.0 BACKGROUND<br>OF THE STUDY</b></p><p>The<br>increase in oil boom in the 70’s was an era of huge and expensive prospect of<br>doubtful utility and viability. However, the heavy dependence on oil and<br>imported input rendered the Nigerian economy to be sensitive to external shocks<br>with the collapse of the world oil market in the mids 1981, an economic crisis<br>emerged in Nigeria, various control measures were put in place in order to<br>correct the disturbing situation between 1982 – 1985 but these measures failed<br>to deal effectively with the fundamental economic and financial problems<br>confronting the economy which was deteriorating.</p><p> </p><p>The<br>nation began to face a situation of persistence and deteriorating balance of<br>payment problem, the external debt continually rise, the emotion of<br>international credit worthiness and the acute shortage of raw materials and<br>consumer goods, as agriculture suffered and severely, neglected, the country<br>(Nigeria) was at the point of collapsing.</p><p>Considering<br>the above circumstances, there is need for national economic reform which the<br>federal government eventually came up with Structural Adjustment Programme<br>(SAP) in 1988 as a strategy to end the deformation of the nation economy and<br>achieve a turn around in the fortunes.</p><p>The<br>current global economic depression facing the world has been described by the<br>world economic and financial experts as the longest and deepest depression in<br>the post war period. Major industrial developed countries share in this performance<br>characterized by declining growth rate, high inflationary pressure, increase in<br>number of unemployment and this trend had serious adverse effect on the<br>economic of developing countries of which Nigeria is included.</p><p>The<br>present development is quite affecting a substantial number of Nigeria<br>contemporary business most of them are on the path of decline, leading to<br>folding up of some companies and many others laying off their staff and<br>equipment as a result of operational hardship with lack of ability to expand<br>and decline in sales volume as well as profit.</p><p>With<br>the present difficult situation in the Nigeria businss environment. There<br>is need for businesses to be re-structured for survival in response to changes<br>that is occurring in the economic environment either a company decide whether<br>to acquire, merge or sell part or whole of its existing business thus, given<br>birth to a stronger, bigger and more profitable outfit that is capable of<br>surviving amidst strong competition.</p><p><b>1.1 HISTORICAL<br>BACKGROUND OF OANDO NIGERIA PLC</b></p><p>Oando<br>Plc commence its business operation as a petroleum marketing company in Nigeria<br>in 1956 under the name “ESSO West Africa Incorporated” a subsidiary of Export<br>Corporation of the USA. In 1969, the company was incorporated under Nigeria laws as<br>“ESSO standard Nigeria Limited. In 1976, the Nigeria Government brought ESSO<br>interest and thus, became the 100% owner of the company. The company was then<br>rename “Unipetrol Nigeria Limited”.</p><p>On 1st March, 1991<br>the company became a public limited company and was known as Unipetrol Nigeria<br>Plc in the same year, 60% of the company’s shares was sold to the Nigeria public<br>under the first phase the then privatization exercise and the company was<br>quoted on the Nigeria<br>stock exchange in February 1992.</p><p>In<br>2000, under the 2nd phase of the Federal Government of Nigeria’s<br>privatization programme, ocean and soil services limited became a core investor<br>by acquiring 305 of the Federal Government’s 40% equity stock in the company,<br>the remaining 10% was sold to the Nigeria public. The investment in<br>the then Unipetrol Nigeria Plc by Ocean Oil Services Limited was with support<br>of its International Technical Partners Compania Espanola De Petroleos (CESPSA)<br>who are currently 2nd largest oil group in Spain and ranks among the<br>top 10 oil group in Europe. CEPSA is a fully Integrated Petroleum Company<br>involved in exploration and production, petrochemicals natural gas, trading,<br>refining, distributing and marketing.</p><p>In<br>August 2002, the company acquired Agip Petrol’s 60% stake of Agip Nigeria Plc,<br>the sale of the 60% interest of Agip Petrol International was the result of an<br>international bid conducted by Agip petrol international B.V with the<br>assistance of an international adviser during which Agip Petroleum<br>International selected to them Unipetrol Nigeria Plc following the acquisition<br>of Agip Nigeria Plc the company was again i.e. branded to Oando Plc in 2003 and<br>emerged as Nigeria<br>2nd largest company in the downstream sector of the oil industry<br>with 15.64% market share.</p><p>1.2<b> STATEMENT<br>OF THE GENERAL PROBLEM</b></p><p>Due to<br>the present economic situation of the country (Nigeria), report indicated that<br>many Nigeria businesses and corporate organizations have closed up while many<br>more may soon close up, even those that have survived, it has been a mergical<br>survival and they are operating far below installed and optimum productive<br>capacities leaving none in doubt that the situation is bad enough, the<br>following problems are notice.</p><p>· <br>There is need to note the fact that many of<br>this organization that are depressed situation can either still be acquired or<br>merged with more prosperous and strong enterprise. In other word, an<br>alternative to this ugly economic woe in<br>the country should have been for companies to come together and continue<br>through merger or acquisition.</p><p>· <br>There is overextension which tend to make the<br>organization fuzzy and unmanageable. There is manager’s hubris, overconfidence<br>about synergies form merger and acquisition which results in overpayment for<br>the target company.</p><p>· <br>There is negative reactions from company’s<br>employees, bankers, suppliers, customers and other which make the process by<br>which a company is bought or sold prove difficult, slow and expensive. Thus,<br>they are not sold as often as they might or should be.</p><p>· <br>Multiple listing service concept has not been<br>applicable to merger and acquisition due to the need for confidentiality.</p><p>· <br>There is lack of proper method, apparatus and<br>techniques for efficiently executing merger and acquisition transactions<br>without compromising the confidentiality of thee parties involved without<br>unauthorized release of information.</p><p>· <br>Lack of good recording keeping of incomes from<br>business undertakings, mostly attributed to illiteracy and in other cases, a<br>deliberate attempt to evade tax is also a problem.</p><p>1.3<b> OBJECTIVE<br>OF THE STUDY</b></p><p><b></b></p><b><p>No<br>business is embarked upon without a set of objectives t</p></b></b></b></b>
<br><p></p>