FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY DILEMMA IN NIGERIA PUBLIC SECTOR: A WARNING MODEL FOR ECONOMIC RETROGRESSION
Table Of Contents
Chapter ONE
INTRODUCTION
- 1.1Introduction
- 1.2Background of Study
- 1.3Problem Statement
- 1.4Objective of Study
- 1.5Limitation of Study
- 1.6Scope of Study
- 1.7Significance of Study
- 1.8Structure of the Research
- 1.9Definition of Terms
Chapter TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2.1Concept of Fiscal Accountability
- 2.2Historical Perspectives on Fiscal Accountability
- 2.3Theoretical Frameworks of Fiscal Accountability
- 2.4Challenges to Fiscal Accountability in the Public Sector
- 2.5Importance of Fiscal Accountability in Economic Development
- 2.6International Best Practices in Fiscal Accountability
- 2.7Technologies for Enhancing Fiscal Accountability
- 2.8Impact of Fiscal Accountability on Government Performance
- 2.9Fiscal Accountability and Transparency
- 2.10Innovations in Fiscal Accountability Reporting
Chapter THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1Research Methodology Overview
- 3.2Research Design and Approach
- 3.3Data Collection Methods
- 3.4Sampling Techniques
- 3.5Data Analysis Procedures
- 3.6Ethical Considerations
- 3.7Limitations of Methodology
- 3.8Validity and Reliability of Data
Chapter FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1Overview of Research Findings
- 4.2Analysis of Data Collected
- 4.3Key Trends and Patterns Identified
- 4.4Comparison with Existing Literature
- 4.5Implications of Findings
- 4.6Recommendations for Future Research
- 4.7Practical Applications of Findings
- 4.8Theoretical Contributions of the Study
Chapter FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 5.1Summary of Findings
- 5.2Conclusions Drawn from the Study
- 5.3Implications for Policy and Practice
- 5.4Contributions to Knowledge in the Field
- 5.5Recommendations for Further Action
Project Abstract
<p> </p><p>The diagnostic survey conducted in 2001 into the Federal Government public procurement revealed that Nigeria lost several hundred billions of Naira over the last few decades due of flagrant abuse of procedures, lack of transparency and merit in the award of contracts in the public sector. Measures like legislative committees, financial audit, ministerial control, judicial reviews, anticorruption agencies, advisory committees, parliamentary questions and public hearing to ensure accountability in the public sector as in developed countries were adopted yet no tangible result has been achieved. This study investigated accountability in the Nigerian Public Sector. The population of the study is Nigeria public sector and the sample frames was drawn from Ministry of Finance, Presidency, Ministry of Works, and National Assembly. Source of data was primary and were collected through structured questionnaire which was distributed to 100 management staff of the above organizations at random. Data were analyzed using Pearson Product Moment Correlation with the aid of SPSS. The result showed that there is weak accountability in Nigeria due to weak accounting infrastructure, poor regulatory framework and attitude of government officials. It was recommended that the government, professional accounting bodies and citizens should work together to have a meaningful resolution on this issue as a matter of urgency</p><br> <br><p></p>
Project Overview
<p>
</p><p>Government exists to serve the needs of the citizens and ensure those needs are provided efficiently and effectively. It accomplishes these goals by providing clear processes and structures for all aspects of executive management (decision-making, strategic alignment, managerial control, supervision and accountability). Governance in both private and public arena has been a hot topic and now hotter due to various recent financial scandals. Citizens and regulators are calling for higher levels of transparency and accountability in all areas of business especially in public service. In a recent study, the World Bank found a significant relationship between good governance and high level of performance (Word Bank 1997). This generated the issue of using appropriate accounting method and today, many countries government are adopting accrual basis of accounting to improve governance and control which is a common practice in the private sector. Accountability is made possible when there is an established clear link between expenditures and performance.</p><p>Accrual accounting helps agencies focus on outcomes and results rather than budgets and spending. Accountability is a concept in ethics and governance with several meanings and it is often used synonymously with such concepts as responsibility, answerability, blameworthiness, liability, and other terms associated with the expectation of account-giving. It stands out as a cherished goal of every civilized and well constituted government all over the world. Accountability is increasingly being used in political discourse and policy documents because it conveys an image of transparency and trustworthiness (Bovens, 2006) and its evocative powers make it indescribable. Government is entrusted with public funds and other resources, and must adhere to the highest ethical standards, honesty, integrity, propriety and objectivity to ensure optimum utilization. These goals can be achieved only through a combination of individual professionalism, personal standards and a rigorous control framework. Openness and transparency help instill public confidence and trust, and are increasingly considered basic operating requirements for any government</p>
<br><p></p>