Project Abstract

Abstract
Compulsory acquisition and compensation laws play a crucial role in balancing the rights of property owners with the needs of the public for development projects. This research project examines the intersection of the law of compulsory acquisition and compensation with the principles of equity. The aim is to analyze how equity principles can inform and influence the application of compulsory acquisition laws to ensure fair outcomes for all parties involved. The concept of compulsory acquisition allows government authorities to acquire private property for public purposes, such as infrastructure projects, urban development, or environmental conservation. While such acquisitions serve the public interest, they often involve a limitation or deprivation of property rights, raising questions of fairness and just compensation. The law of compensation seeks to provide a remedy by requiring authorities to compensate property owners for the value of their property taken or affected by the acquisition. Equity, as a legal principle, focuses on fairness, justice, and equality in the application of laws. By incorporating equity considerations into the law of compulsory acquisition and compensation, the research explores how the balance between public interest and private property rights can be maintained. Equity may require authorities to consider factors such as the impact of the acquisition on vulnerable or disadvantaged property owners, the proportionality of compensation to the loss suffered, and the procedural fairness in the acquisition process. The research project employs a comparative legal analysis to examine how different legal systems incorporate equity principles into their compulsory acquisition laws. By studying case law, statutory provisions, and scholarly commentary, the research aims to identify best practices and challenges in balancing the competing interests at play in compulsory acquisition cases. The project also considers the role of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, such as mediation or arbitration, in resolving disputes between authorities and property owners in a fair and efficient manner. Overall, this research project contributes to the ongoing discourse on the intersection of compulsory acquisition and compensation laws with equity principles. By highlighting the importance of fairness and justice in the application of these laws, the research seeks to provide insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, and scholars on how to achieve a balance between public interests and property rights in compulsory acquisition cases.

Project Overview

INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR THE STUDY Although the various governments in the federation could acquire land at any time by working their power of eminent domain they still (most in the south) face the problem of rigidity associated with native laws and customs. In an attempt to breakdown these rigidity the various land laws were enacted by government among which are public land acquisition decree No 33 of 1976 the state land compensation decree No 38 and the latest of the laws concerning the acquisition of land by government and compensation there to. By section 1 of this act all land comprised in the territory of each state except land vested in the federal government or its agencies are vested in the governor of that state and such land shall be held in trust and administered for the use and common benefit of all Nigeria in accordance with the provisions of the act. The governor laving been vested with all land in his state of jurisdiction is further empowered by section 28 of the act to revoke a right of occupancy (statutory or customary) for over rigidity public interest under section 29 of the act the revocation of a right of occupancy for the cause set out in section 29 entitles the holding and occupier to compensation for vale of their unexhausted improvement at the data of revoke as accordingly provided in section 29 sub section 4 paragraph 6 compensation with respect to building installation or improvement shall be for the amount of the replacement on the basic of the presented method of assessment as determined by the approve it could be seen from the above that the act state explicitly that the assessment of comp sensation payable for compulsory acquisition of real property shall be and according to value cost approach.