Home / Computer Science / ADVANCED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR SOFTWARE EVALUATION USING WEIGHTED SUM

ADVANCED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR SOFTWARE EVALUATION USING WEIGHTED SUM

 

Table Of Contents


Chapter ONE

1.1 Introduction
1.2 Background of Study
1.3 Problem Statement
1.4 Objective of Study
1.5 Limitation of Study
1.6 Scope of Study
1.7 Significance of Study
1.8 Structure of the Research
1.9 Definition of Terms

Chapter TWO

2.1 Overview of Decision Support Systems
2.2 Evolution of Decision Support Systems
2.3 Types of Decision Support Systems
2.4 Importance of Decision Support Systems
2.5 Software Evaluation Methods
2.6 Weighted Sum Method for Software Evaluation
2.7 Applications of Weighted Sum Method
2.8 Challenges in Software Evaluation
2.9 Integration of Decision Support Systems in Software Evaluation
2.10 Future Trends in Decision Support Systems

Chapter THREE

3.1 Research Methodology Overview
3.2 Research Design
3.3 Data Collection Methods
3.4 Sampling Techniques
3.5 Data Analysis Procedures
3.6 Reliability and Validity
3.7 Ethical Considerations
3.8 Limitations of the Research Methodology

Chapter FOUR

4.1 Data Analysis and Interpretation
4.2 Findings on Software Evaluation using Weighted Sum
4.3 Comparison with Other Evaluation Methods
4.4 Impact of Decision Support Systems on Software Evaluation
4.5 Case Studies on Software Evaluation
4.6 Recommendations for Software Evaluation Improvement
4.7 Implications for Decision Support System Development
4.8 Managerial Insights from the Findings

Chapter FIVE

5.1 Summary of Findings
5.2 Conclusions
5.3 Contributions to Knowledge
5.4 Practical Implications
5.5 Recommendations for Future Research

Project Abstract

Abstract
Software evaluation is a critical process in the development and deployment of software systems. To aid in this process, decision support systems (DSS) have been developed to provide guidance and support to decision-makers. In this research, an advanced decision support system for software evaluation using the weighted sum method is proposed. The system aims to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of software evaluation by incorporating weighted criteria based on their relative importance. The proposed system utilizes a multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate software based on various predefined criteria such as functionality, usability, performance, reliability, and cost. These criteria are assigned weights based on their significance in the evaluation process. The weighted sum method aggregates the scores of individual criteria to calculate an overall score for each software alternative. One of the key advantages of the proposed system is its ability to handle subjective evaluations by allowing decision-makers to input their preferences and weights for each criterion. This flexibility enables the system to accommodate varying perspectives and priorities, leading to more personalized and accurate evaluations. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the system, a case study was conducted using a set of software alternatives. The results showed that the advanced decision support system provided consistent and reliable evaluations across different scenarios. The system's capability to handle uncertainties and varying preferences was particularly highlighted as a strength in complex decision-making situations. Furthermore, the system's user-friendly interface and interactive features were well-received by the participants in the case study. The visualization tools and decision-making support functions were found to facilitate the evaluation process and help decision-makers understand the rationale behind the software recommendations. In conclusion, the proposed advanced decision support system for software evaluation using the weighted sum method offers a robust and flexible approach to software evaluation. By incorporating weighted criteria and accommodating subjective preferences, the system provides decision-makers with a comprehensive tool to make informed decisions in software selection. Future research directions include exploring additional decision-making methods and expanding the system's capabilities to address more complex evaluation scenarios.

Project Overview

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

A successful evaluation is not simply picking a product based on intuition. It involves a formal process, the right mixture of evaluators, and a specific quantifiable set of evaluation criteria. The process should include how to handle differences in scoring by the evaluators. The task of choosing a software component for a specific function in order to integrate it in a software system is a typical case of multi-criteria decision making that frequently occurs in Software Engineering. Consider a decision maker with a set of components to fulfill a function in a software system, for example creating digital signatures on files. A number of decision factors will come into play such as functional suitability, security, performance efficiency, interoperability and costs. Some of these may pose conflicts: For example, increased security may come at the price of decreased performance efficiency or increased price. The decision maker has to follow a trustworthy and repeatable procedure to choose the component that best fulfills the objectives at hand (Becker et al, 2013). The domain of component selection presents an interesting case of multiple criteria decision support systems (MCDSS) since it exhibits a number of peculiarities:

  1. A comparably large number of decisions of a very similar kind is made.
  2. The number of alternatives and decision criteria can be quite large.
  • The decision criteria are rather well understood in terms of the facets and quality aspects that are evaluated.

However, the individual assessment of each criterion’s utility towards these aspects varies substantially among cases. In these scenarios, the problem of eliciting, specifying, evaluating and weighing the criteria becomes challenging, and the complexity of making a choice is correspondingly high. Given the scale of the decision making problem, the primary goals for improving decision support are the decision makers’ efficiency and effectiveness in reaching a choice on software components evaluation and selection (Becker et al, 2013).

Evaluation as a general endeavor can be characterized by the following features:

  1. Evaluation is a task, which results in one or more reported outcomes.
  2. Evaluation is an aid for planning, and therefore the outcome is an evaluation of different possible actions.
  • Evaluation is goal oriented. The primary goal is to check results of actions or interventions, in order to improve the quality of the actions or to choose the best action alternative.

Software can be evaluated with respect to different aspects, for example, functionality, reliability, usability, efficiency, maintainability, portability.  In earlier times evaluation of software took place at the end of the developing phase, using experimental designs and statistical analysis, evaluation is nowadays used as a tool for information gathering within iterative design: β€œExplicit human-factors evaluations of early interactive systems (when they were done at all) were poorly integrated with development and therefore ineffective. They tended to be done too late for any substantial changes to the system still be feasible and, in common with other human-factors contributions to development, they were often unfavourably received. Instruments for evaluation are not primarily used for global evaluation of an accomplished product, but these instruments are applied during the development of a product. Indeed, most experts agree nowadays that the development of usable software can only be done by a systematic consideration of usability aspects within the life-cycle model. One prominent part is the evaluation of prototypes with respect to usability aspects, employing suitable evaluation techniques in order to find usability errors and weaknesses of the software at an early stage (Bandor, 2006).

Decision Supports Systems (DSS) are computer-based information systems designed in such a way that help managers to select one of the many alternative solutions to a problem. It is possible to automate some of the decision making processes in a large, computer-based DSS which is sophisticated and analyze huge amount of information fast. It helps corporate to increase market share, reduce costs, increase profitability and enhance quality. The nature of problem itself plays the main role in a process of decision making. A DSS is an interactive computer based information system with an organized collection of models, people, procedures, software, databases, telecommunication, and devices, which helps decision makers to solve unstructured or semi-structured business problems. Adopting decision support system to software evaluation guarantees accurate evaluation of the software (Abdelkader, 2006).

1.2 Statement of the Problem

As institutions and organizations spend huge amount on Enterprise resource planning (ERP) packages and other computer software that cost hundreds of thousands and even millions of dollars, purchasing a software solution is a high expenditure activity that consumes a significant portion of companies’ capital budgets. Selecting the right solution is an exhausting process for companies. Therefore, selecting a software package that meets the requirements needs a full examination of many conflicting factors and it is a difficult task. Most times the software bought do not meet the needs of the institution or organization despite the huge amount. To avoid the problem of software ineffectiveness, this has led researchers to investigate better ways of evaluating and selecting software packages.

1.3 Aim and Objectives of the Study

The aim of the study is to develop an improved decision support system for software evaluation that will help organizations to determine the effectiveness of a software product based on its features and capabilities. The following are the objectives of the study:

  1. To design a decision support system for software evaluation using quantitative method for software evaluation and selection .
  2. To develop a software that will assess the software features to determine their level of effectiveness?
  3. To compare a system that will maintain record of software evaluation records

1.4 Scope of the Study

This study covers advanced decision support system for software evaluation using weighted sum. It is limited to the capturing of the weighted sum of software features and the determination of the best software option based on the total weight of its features. Evaluation is based on three different criteria categories which are: The vendor, hardware/ software requirements and cost/benefits of the software system.

1.5 Significance of the Study

The significance of the study is that it will help institutions and organizations evaluate the effectiveness of a software product. The study will also serve as a useful reference material to other researchers seeking for information concerning the subject.

1.6 Organization of Research

This research work is organized into five chapters. Chapter one is concerned with the introduction of the research study and it presents the preliminaries, theoretical background, statement of the problem, aim and objectives of the study, significance of the study, scope of the study, organization of the research and definition of terms.

Chapter two focuses on the literature review, the contributions of other scholars on the subject matter is discussed.

Chapter three is concerned with the system analysis and design. It presents the research methodology used in the development of the system, it analyzes the present system to identify the problems and provides information on the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed system. The system design is also presented in this chapter.

Chapter four presents the system implementation and documentation, the choice of programming language, analysis of modules, choice of programming language and system requirements for implementation.

Chapter five focuses on the summary, constraints of the study, conclusion and recommendations are provided in this chapter based on the study carried out.

1.7 Definition of Terms

Software  Programs and applications that can be run on a computer system, e.g. word processing or database packages

Evaluation  The act of considering or examining something in order to judge its value, quality, importance, extent, or condition

System: An assembly of computer hardware, software, and peripherals functioning together to solve a common problem



Blazingprojects Mobile App

πŸ“š Over 50,000 Project Materials
πŸ“± 100% Offline: No internet needed
πŸ“ Over 98 Departments
πŸ” Software coding and Machine construction
πŸŽ“ Postgraduate/Undergraduate Research works
πŸ“₯ Instant Whatsapp/Email Delivery

Blazingprojects App

Related Research

Computer Science. 2 min read

Predicting Disease Outbreaks Using Machine Learning and Data Analysis...

The project topic, "Predicting Disease Outbreaks Using Machine Learning and Data Analysis," focuses on utilizing advanced computational techniques to ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more β†’
Computer Science. 2 min read

Implementation of a Real-Time Facial Recognition System using Deep Learning Techniqu...

The project on "Implementation of a Real-Time Facial Recognition System using Deep Learning Techniques" aims to develop a sophisticated system that ca...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more β†’
Computer Science. 4 min read

Applying Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detection...

The project topic "Applying Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detection" focuses on utilizing machine learning algorithms to enhance the detectio...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more β†’
Computer Science. 4 min read

Analyzing and Improving Machine Learning Model Performance Using Explainable AI Tech...

The project topic "Analyzing and Improving Machine Learning Model Performance Using Explainable AI Techniques" focuses on enhancing the effectiveness ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more β†’
Computer Science. 3 min read

Applying Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Stock Market Trends...

The project topic "Applying Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Stock Market Trends" revolves around the application of cutting-edge machine le...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more β†’
Computer Science. 4 min read

Application of Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance in Industrial IoT Systems...

The project topic, "Application of Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance in Industrial IoT Systems," focuses on the integration of machine learn...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more β†’
Computer Science. 3 min read

Anomaly Detection in Internet of Things (IoT) Networks using Machine Learning Algori...

Anomaly detection in Internet of Things (IoT) networks using machine learning algorithms is a critical research area that aims to enhance the security and effic...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more β†’
Computer Science. 3 min read

Anomaly Detection in Network Traffic Using Machine Learning Algorithms...

Anomaly detection in network traffic using machine learning algorithms is a crucial aspect of cybersecurity that aims to identify unusual patterns or behaviors ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more β†’
Computer Science. 2 min read

Predictive maintenance using machine learning algorithms...

Predictive maintenance is a proactive maintenance strategy that aims to predict equipment failures before they occur, thereby reducing downtime and maintenance ...

BP
Blazingprojects
Read more β†’
WhatsApp Click here to chat with us