EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT COMPOSTS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF GREEN BEANS
Table Of Contents
<p> <b>TABLE OF CONTENTS </b></p><p>DECLARATION………………………………………………………………… .ii </p><p>DEDICATION…………………………………………………………………… iii </p><p>ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ……………………………………………………… iv </p><p>ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………… v </p><p>TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………… vi</p><p> LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………… x </p><p>LIST OF FIGURES ………………………………………………………………xi </p><p>
Chapter ONE
: INTRODUCTION
1.1 General Background………………………………………..1 </p><p>1.2 Problem Statement…………………………………………………………….3 </p><p>1.3 Justification …………………………………………………………………... 4 </p><p>1.4 Objectives……………………………………………………………………... 4 </p><p>1.5 Research questions…………………………………………………………….5 </p><p>1.6 Significance…………………………………………………………………….5 </p><p>
Chapter TWO
: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction……………………………………………6 </p><p>2.2 Origins and Definitions of waste ……………………………………………. 6 </p><p>2.3 Waste management……………………………………………………………7 </p><p>2.3.1 Municipal solid waste………………………………………………………... 9 </p><p>2.3.1 Waste generation and disposal…………………………………………….. 10 </p><p>2.3.3 Landfilling…………………………………………………………………..10 </p><p>2.4 Origin and chemical content of Digestate…………………………………..11 </p><p>2.4.1 Origins and definitions…………………………………………………….. 11 </p><p>2.4.2 Composition of digestate…………………………………………………... 13 </p><p>2.4.3 pH of digestate……………………………………………………………... 13 </p><p>2.4.4 Macro element content of digestate………………………………………... 15 </p><p>2.4.5 Micro element content of digestate…………………………………………16 </p><p>2.4.6 Organic matter content of digestate………………………………………... 16 </p><p>2.5 Effects of digestate on soil properties……………………………………….17 </p><p>2.5.1 Effect of digestate on soil pH ……………………………………………... 17 </p><p>2.5.2 Effect of digestate on soil macro element content………………………… 18 </p><p>2.5.3 Effect of digestate on soil microelement………………………………….. 18 </p><p>2.5.4 Effect of digestate on soil organic matter content…………………………. 19 </p><p>2.5.5 Effect of digestate on the microbiological activity of soil………………….19 </p><p>2.5.6 Effects of digestate on crop yield………………………………………….. 20 </p><p>2.5.7 Effects of digestate on the quality of crops…………………………………21</p><p> 2.6 Composting methods………………………………………………………... 22 </p><p>2.6.1 Turned windrow composting ……………………………………………... 24 </p><p>2.6.2 Vermicomposting………………………………………………………….. 24 </p><p>2.6.3 Co-composting……………………………………………………………. 25 </p><p>2.7 Cultivation of beans…………………………………………………………. 26 </p><p>2.8 Conceptual framework……………………………………………………... 27 </p><p>
Chapter THREE
: MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.1 Study area………………………………30 </p><p>3.1.1. Location of Study Area……………………………………………………... 30 </p><p>3.1.2 Climate………………………………………………………………………..30 </p><p>3.1.3 Geology, Soils and vegetation……………………………………………….. 30 </p><p>3.2 Compost……………………………………………………………………….. 31</p><p> 3.3 Experimental design………………………………………………………….. 31 </p><p>3.3.1 Treatment application and crop management ………………………………..32 </p><p>3.4 Data collection…………………………………………………………………34 </p><p>3.4.1 Types and sources of data…………………………………………………….34 </p><p>3.4.2 Determination of dry matter…………………………………………………. 34 </p><p>3.4.3 Determination of plant nutrients by analytical methods……………………. 35 </p><p>3.4.4 Growth and yield…………………………………………………………….. 36 </p><p>3.5 Data analysis…………………………………………………………………...36 </p><p>
Chapter FOUR
: RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
4.1 Introduction……………………………37 </p><p>4.2 Effects of various treatments on plant growth……………………………... 37 </p><p>4.2.1 Treatment effect on plant height……………………………………………...37 </p><p>4.2.2 Treatment effect on number of leaves……………………………………….. 38 </p><p>4.2.3 Treatment effect on biomass dry matter……………………………………... 40 </p><p>4.3 Treatment effect on nutrient content of plants……………………………... 41 </p><p>
Chapter FIVE
: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Conclusion……………….. 45 </p><p>5.2 Recommendations……………………………………………………………. 45</p><p> References………………………………………………………………………….46 </p><p>Appendix I………………………………………………………………………… 60 </p><p>Appendix II………………………………………………………………………...61 </p><p>Appendix III………………………………………………………………………. 64 </p><p>Appendix IV………………………………………………………………………. 74
<br></p>
Project Abstract
<p> <b>ABSTRACT</b> </p><p>Composting of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) has received renewed attention as a result
of increasing waste disposal cost and the environmental concerns associated with using
landfills. A targeted end use of the compost is for horticultural crop production.
Currently, quality standards for MSW compost are lacking and there is the need to
establish them. Elevated heavy metal concentrations in MSW compost have been
reported; however, through proper sorting and recycling prior to composting,
contamination by heavy metals can be reduced Compost has been shown to be useful in
horticultural crop production as it improves soil physical properties, such as lowering
bulk density and increasing water-holding capacity. Compost enhances supply of
essential nutrients to some extent. However, supplemental fertilizer, particularly N, is
usually required. A pilot dry digestion composting plant was thus established on the
campus of the University of Nigeria, Nuskka. The setup was to assess the
effectiveness of processing of organic municipal waste to obtain biogas for domestic use
and digestate for the purposes of composting. The different composts obtained were then
used in planting green beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). The aim of this work was to assess
the effects of the different composts on the performance of green beans. Results of this
work identified and highlighted the superiority of fertilized crops over non-fertilized
ones in terms of growth and dry matter accumulation. A long term research should be
carried out on the effects of prolonged use of composts produced by vermicomposting,
co-composting and windrow composting on crop and soil. Public awareness on the
effects of compost on soil, crop yield and environment should be intensified.
<br></p>
Project Overview
<p>
<b>1.0 INTRODUCTION </b></p><p><b>1.1 BACKGROUND STUDY</b></p><p>Rapid population growth and urbanization worldwide, have led to an enormous increase
in solid waste generation per unit area (Kassim & Ali, 2006). The management of
specific waste streams such as biodegradable waste represents an important element of
the strategy to help reduce the impact of waste on the environment. Considering the fact
that the largest fraction of waste in developing countries is organic in nature and
therefore amendable to anaerobic digestion, it makes environmental and economic sense
to survey this option (Mbuligwe & Kassenga, 2004).
Biological treatment of biodegradable waste such as composting and anaerobic digestion
(AD), has several advantages. It contributes to the reduction of greenhouse effect, as it
diverts biodegradable waste from landfills where methane is produced and emitted in an
uncontrolled manner to the atmosphere (Burri & Martius, 2011). When used as soil
amendment in agriculture it maintains or restores soil productivity. Its humified organic
matter provides a unique property of compost itself. Another promising treatment option
is anaerobic digestion which produces an energy-rich biogas and digestate. The latter one
can be used as a soil amendment or fertilizer for arable land.
Anaerobic digestion is a biological process where a diverse group of micro-organism
convert the complex organic matter into a simple and stable end product in the absence
of oxygen. This process is very attractive because it yields biogas, i.e. a mixture of
methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) which can be used as renewable energy source.
The dry anaerobic digestion (AD) process is an innovative waste-recycling method to
treat high-solid content bio-wastes. It is done at a solid concentration higher than 10%
and enables a higher volumetric organic loading rate, minimal material handling, lower
energy requirements for heating, limited environmental consequences and energetically
effective performance. Dry anaerobic digestion [>15% total solid (TS)] has an advantage
over wet digestion (<10% TS) because it allows for the use of a smaller volume of
reactor and because it reduces waste water production. Additionally, it produces a
fertilizer that is easier to transport.
<br></p><p>
Soil fertility is a limiting factor to agricultural productivity in many parts of the
developing world. Among the problems of tropical soils, soil acidity, characterized by
low pH, excessive aluminium, deficient calcium and low organic matter are most
prominent (Hue, 1992). Tropical soils are often prone to strong phosphate fixation which
renders phosphorus unavailable to plant. Such soils require extremely high phosphate
application in order to alleviate the effect of phosphate fixation. Soil acidity and mineral
deficiencies can be corrected by applying lime and fertilizers to the soil. Unfortunately,
lime and fertilizers are not always easy options available to resource-poor farmers (Hue,
1992). However it is reported that green manures and composted organic material
increase soil organic matter (SOM), provides nutrients for plant growth, alleviate
aluminium toxicity and render phosphorus more available to crops (Beltran et al., 2002).
This increased availability of phosphorus is probably caused by the reaction of organic
matter-derived molecules with soil minerals (Hue, 1992).
<br></p><p> The interests of
urban waste recycling go well with the promotion of urban agriculture since urban and
peri-urban farmers are in need of organic matter as soil conditioner. In a region of
abundant rainfall, Nuskka possesses great potential for implementing planned organic
waste collection and processing for local food production.
<br></p><p>
<b>1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM</b> </p><p>According to UNEP (2005) the rate of waste generation generally increases in direct
proportion to that of a nation’s advancement in development, and failure to provide a
management system could result in greater environmental degradation with increase
health risk to the urban population (UNEP, 2005).
In Nigeria, all district, municipal and metropolitan assemblies give urban sanitation and
waste management a priority in their development objectives. </p><p>However, their ability to
contain the problems of waste management is declining, because of rising capital cost for
plant and equipment, increasing operation and maintenance cost, the rapid spatial and
population growth of most urban areas with decreasing coverage levels, and increase in
levels of waste generated, confronted by increasing public demand for improved services
(Salifu, 1995).
<br></p><p>
Due to Nuskka's inability to handle SWM adequately, it has been supported largely in
the delivery of environmental sanitation services over the past decade by central
government/external donor interventions. However, as with other infrastructure and
service sectors, the overuse of equipment and facilities to terminal ruin is the practice
(Salifu, 1995). A pilot dry digestion composting plant was thus established on the
campus of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN). The aim of this setup was to
assess the effectiveness of processing of organic municipal waste. The primary purpose
was to obtain biogas for domestic use. One of the potential benefits of the produced
digestate is its potential to be used for the purpose of composting. The produced
digestate thus had to be evaluated in terms of its agronomic potential and benefits. This
is what necessitated this study which seeks to evaluate and compare the effects of using
the fresh and post-treated (composted) digestates for crop production.
<br></p><p>
<b>1.3 JUSTIFICATION</b></p><p>Agricultural systems produce organic wastes for which the soil has the capacity to
assimilate as well as waste from different sources (Soliva, 1994, Soliva & Felipo, 2003).
The proper management of organic waste through soil management could lead to
economic and environmental benefits which contribute to sustainable development. It is
therefore necessary to take into account conservation and crop nutritional needs when
dealing with agro-waste.
<br></p><p>
<b>1.4 OBJECTIVE</b></p><p>The main objective of the study was to assess the impact of unprocessed and composted
digestate from dry fermentation as an alternative to synthetic fertilizers on green beans
yield.
<br></p><p>
The specific objectives of the study were to:
<br></p><p>
1. Compare the effects of different unprocessed and composted digestates on
growth parameters of green beans. </p><p>2. Compare the effects of different unprocessed and composted digestates on
biomass and nutrient levels of green beans.
<br></p>