AGRICULTURAL YOUTH SENSITIVE POLICIES: THE WAY FORWARD IN ENHANCING YOUTHS INCLINATION TOWARDS AGRICULTURE
Table Of Contents
Project Abstract
<p></p><p> <b>ABSTRACT</b></p>
<p><i>Youths constitute a formidable force
in the agricultural production process, constituting a sizeable proportion of
the workforce especially in the rural areas. While their contribution towards
attaining food security cannot be underestimated yet their apparent lukewarm
attitude towards agriculture is a source of concern. Majority of agricultural
policies and programmes formulated in Nigeria do not consider stirring up the
interests of youth, this has also made youths to seek employment in other
sectors of the economy in order to empower themselves economically, and leaving
the bulk of agricultural practices in the hands of old people. The paper
reveals inadequacies in past agricultural policies and highlight ways to stir
up the interest of youths in the field. The paper among many other recommendations
says that ICT should be promoted among youths to uplift the face of agriculture
from playing the second fiddle to other professions.</i></p>
<p><b><i>Keywords</i></b><i> Youth, Agriculture, Policies, Empowerment,
Nigeria</i></p>
<br><p></p>
Project Overview
<p></p><p><b>1.0 INTRODUCTION</b></p><p><b>1.1 BACKGROUND STUDY</b></p>
<p>Agriculture
is a known profession in Nigeria and the largest employer of labour in the
country. Yet from observation, most people practicing it as a means of
livelihood are often the old and uneducated youths. The youth at present,
constitute about 60% of Nigeria’s population and have over the years made
significant contributions to National Development (Vision 2010 report, 2005). </p>
<p>The
poor state of youth participation in agricultural activities in Nigeria has
been a matter of great concern among agriculturists, agricultural researchers
as well as administrators. The decline in the number of students entering the
field of agriculture has been on the rise over the years, many students
unfortunately look down on agriculture, even despising it, hence resulting in
non-challant attitude towards Agriculture. Agricultural
transformation will not take place in developing countries such as Nigeria
unless there is improved technical knowledge and willingness of youth to be in
the sector. Idachaba (1995). </p>
<p>As
a result of the main focus of Nigerian economy on oil, while agriculture is
neglected, youths do not tend to see any potential in agriculture. Hence, a lot
of young people have no interest in farming because they don’t see it as a
lucrative business (Mohammed-Lawal et al, 2009). According to Abdulsalam-Saghir
et al (2008), the youth see agricultural practice as inferior, unfulfilling and
very hard. There is an urgent need to address the issue so as to change the
negative view of youth towards agriculture and encourage them to embrace the
vocation. This is because the development and future of agriculture like other
sectors of life depends on the youths. Youths have the potential to overcome
some of the major constraints to expanding animal production in developing countries
such as pest control, feeding, genetic improvement and protection against
predators because they are often more open to new ideas and practices than
adult farmers. They play an important role in awareness raising on different
subjects (Ijere, 1992). </p>
<p>Mobilizing
the youths for national development is a common phenomenon amongst the western
and developing countries. In such countries as Great Britain, Netherlands,
Denmark, Germany, the United States of America and Tanzania, the involvement of
youths in agricultural production through youth programmes had contributed
significantly to agricultural development and empowering the citizenry and
youths to always meet the full needs and deep seated aspiration to be self
sufficient in food production (FAO, 1990). Indeed, since the youths are the
future of any country, it is useful to develop them into patriotic citizens,
future progressive farmers and better citizens.</p>
<p><b>1.2 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND DEFINITIONS</b></p>
<p>A
lot of scholars have different views about the group that constitute youth and
as a result of this, it is not an easy task to define or identify who is a
youth. Eremie (2002) described youth as a state or time of being young, a
transition between childhood and adulthood. Similarly, Gwarry et al (2008)
described youth as a state of transition between children and adulthood
characterized by energy, intelligence and hope. According to Ijioma and Ibezim
(2010) youth is a stage in one’s life when one is agile, energetic, determined
and adventous in experimenting different perspective of life. They further
stressed that youths have high enthusiasm and learn very fast. They are prone
to innovativeness, less risk-shy and eager to change. Nwachukwu (2008) defined
youth as people within the age of 15 and 24 years, Adegboye et al (2010)
considers a youth to be anybody between 12 and 30 years of age. According to
Onuekwusi (2005) the youths have been identified as contributing the major
resource base for any country who wants to embark on any meaningful
agricultural and rural development projects. This is because they can easily
develop the skills, knowledge and attitude that enable them to take an active
role in the society.<b> </b>Adegboye and
Eniolorunda (2006) opined that incorporating youths in agricultural production
will facilitate capacity building and empowering them for agricultural
productivity which will predispose them to a favorable attitude and future
career in agriculture. </p>
<p><b>1.3 INADEQUACIES OF PAST AGRICULTURE POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES</b></p>
<p>Earlier attempts at improving agricultural
production in Nigeria such as the operation feed the nation, the green
revolution programme and other laudable interventions in the agricultural
sector emphasized increased production without commensurate efforts at
post-harvest management and industrial utilization. Most of them handled the
various aspects of the post-harvest system such as processing, packaging,
marketing, storage, distribution and transportation in isolation from one
another. There was no effort to make the system comprehensive and holistic in
its management.</p>
<p>Also, industrial utilization of
agricultural commodities is constrained by inadequate linkage of agriculture to
industrial sector. Each programme followed haphazard implementation that creates
more problems without achieving anticipated goals. Although, most of the
programmes yielded seasonal increases in agricultural output, inefficient and
ineffective post-harvest management and generally low level of industrial
utilizations have always resulted in substantial agricultural wastages, food
losses, reduction in available food, restriction in its spread over the year,
and also reduction in employment and rural income.</p>
<p>The difficulty confronting the local
industrial utilization of agricultural commodities is how to initiate and
sustain the momentum for diversification of raw agricultural commodities into
agro-industry for transformation into high value added products in order to
realize and optimize high growth potential that undoubtedly exists in
agricultural commodities. This remained worrisome by the dilapidating state of
rural infrastructures that hampered effective linkage of agriculture to the
industry. This undoubtedly makes investment unattractive to the private sector
and thus limiting agricultural development in the country.</p>
<p>Excessive dependence on a narrow range of
products as sources of income and foreign exchange earnings bring about a
number of unfavourable consequences on the economy. Firstly, it exposes farmers
unduly to the vagaries of climate, pests and diseases and to price
fluctuations. Secondly it leads to fluctuations in farm income and government
revenue. Thirdly, it contributes to environmental degradation. Fourthly, it may
result in failure to take advantage of complementarities (e.g. between
livestock and crops) and has negative effects on diet, food security and
welfare of Nigerians.</p>
<p>In addition, an adverse international term
of trade facing the primary agricultural commodity sector is a further
constraint to growth of the sector. There is a clear need to diversify
production and export base, both horizontally and vertically, from low value
added to high value added products.</p>
<p>High growth potentials and opportunities
available in diversifying agricultural commodities to agro-industry for
generation of high value added products had been limited and thus
underexploited in Nigeria due to irregular supply of raw materials from the
agricultural sector to the agro-industrial firms. Available evidence depicts
that there had been poor linkage of agricultural sector to the industrial
sector. This had aggravated the low domestic utilization of agricultural
commodities by the agro-allied firms, which is being reflected by a general
decline in the average capacity utilization rates by the firms. For instance,
average capacity utilization rates had declined from 54.3per cent in 1980 to
19.0 percent in 2005 in cocoa confectionary industry.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><b>1.4 AGRICULTURE POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES
THAT WILL ATTRACT YOUTHS MUST ENSURE THE FOLLOWING: </b></p>
<p><b>1.4.1 SUSTAINABLE
AGRICULTURAL INFRASTUCTURE</b></p>
<p>Sustainable agricultural development in developing
countries like Nigeria to uplift young small-scale farmers and create
sustainable rural economy requires access to productive infrastructures such as
land, roads, electricity, marketing facilities, irrigation facilities, specialized
agricultural careers across the value chains, etc. Access to land for example is extremely
important for young people trying to earn a livelihood in agriculture Land
access is not only the number one requirement for starting farming, but it can
also contribute to household food security and is a means for employment
creation and income generation. Youth from all around the world see secure
access to land as fundamental for entering farming. The sector is seen as
highly unattractive due to ignorant assumptions which often times limit it to
labour intensive engagement; ignoring many other professional and
entrepreneurial opportunities across the value chain (Obert, 2012). Promotion
and support of advocacy work that is aimed at creating entrepreneurial
awareness among youths about countless opportunities existing across the value
chain remains paramount. </p>
<br><p></p>