Thesis Abstract

Abstract
This thesis investigates the comparison of image quality between digital radiography (DR) and computed radiography (CR) systems in a clinical setting. The study aims to evaluate and compare the image quality produced by these two radiographic modalities to determine their respective strengths and limitations. Chapter One provides an introduction to the research topic, highlighting the background of the study, the problem statement, research objectives, limitations, scope, significance, and the structure of the thesis. Additionally, key terminologies relevant to the study are defined to provide clarity. Chapter Two comprises a comprehensive literature review that explores existing research on DR and CR systems, image quality assessment methods, and studies comparing these modalities in clinical practice. The review includes ten key points that form the foundation for the study and help contextualize the research within the current body of knowledge. Chapter Three outlines the research methodology employed in this study, detailing the research design, data collection methods, sample selection criteria, variables measured, data analysis techniques, and ethical considerations. The chapter also discusses the calibration procedures and quality assurance measures implemented to ensure the reliability and validity of the study findings. Additionally, the chapter presents the instrumentation used for image acquisition and analysis. In Chapter Four, the findings of the study are elaborated upon, with a detailed discussion of the image quality comparisons between DR and CR systems. The results are presented in a clear and systematic manner, highlighting differences in spatial resolution, contrast resolution, noise levels, and overall diagnostic quality between the two modalities. The chapter also addresses any discrepancies or unexpected outcomes, providing insights into the implications of the findings for clinical practice. Chapter Five presents the conclusion and summary of the thesis, encapsulating the key findings, implications, and recommendations derived from the study. The chapter discusses the significance of the research outcomes in enhancing clinical decision-making, optimizing imaging protocols, and improving patient care outcomes. Finally, the limitations of the study are acknowledged, and suggestions for future research directions are proposed. In conclusion, this thesis contributes to the understanding of image quality differences between digital radiography and computed radiography systems in a clinical setting. By evaluating and comparing these modalities, the study provides valuable insights that can inform radiographers, radiologists, and healthcare providers in selecting the most appropriate imaging technique for specific clinical scenarios.

Thesis Overview