Thesis Abstract

Abstract
Policy implementation in Nigeria faces various challenges that hinder its effectiveness and successful execution. This research study aims to explore these challenges in-depth to provide insights for policymakers and stakeholders. The primary focus is on identifying the key obstacles that impede policy implementation in Nigeria and analyzing their impact on governance and development outcomes. Through a comprehensive review of existing literature, interviews with policymakers, and analysis of relevant data, this research identifies several critical challenges facing policy implementation in Nigeria. These challenges include corruption and lack of accountability, inadequate funding and resource constraints, weak institutional capacity, political instability and policy reversals, as well as poor coordination and communication among government agencies. Corruption and lack of accountability pose significant obstacles to effective policy implementation in Nigeria. Mismanagement of resources, embezzlement, and lack of transparency undermine the trust in government institutions and impede the successful execution of policies. Addressing corruption and improving accountability mechanisms are essential steps towards enhancing policy implementation in the country. Inadequate funding and resource constraints also limit the implementation of policies in Nigeria. The lack of financial resources, as well as insufficient infrastructure and human capital, hinder the government's ability to deliver essential services and achieve development goals. Addressing these resource constraints through improved budgetary allocations, efficient resource management, and partnerships with the private sector is crucial for successful policy implementation. Weak institutional capacity further complicates policy implementation in Nigeria. Government agencies often lack the necessary expertise, skills, and technical know-how to effectively implement policies and programs. Strengthening institutional capacity through training, recruitment of qualified personnel, and institutional reforms can help overcome this challenge and improve the implementation process. Political instability and policy reversals also pose challenges to policy implementation in Nigeria. Changes in government leadership, shifts in policy priorities, and inconsistent decisions can disrupt the implementation process and lead to delays and inefficiencies. Ensuring political stability, continuity in policies, and stakeholder engagement are essential for enhancing the effectiveness of policy implementation. Additionally, poor coordination and communication among government agencies hinder the seamless implementation of policies in Nigeria. Fragmentation, duplication of efforts, and lack of information sharing among different departments and levels of government lead to inefficiencies and gaps in policy execution. Enhancing coordination mechanisms, establishing clear communication channels, and promoting inter-agency collaboration are crucial for improving policy implementation outcomes in Nigeria. In conclusion, addressing the challenges of policy implementation in Nigeria requires a multi-faceted approach that tackles corruption, resource constraints, institutional capacity, political instability, and coordination issues. By overcoming these obstacles, policymakers can enhance the effectiveness and impact of policies, ultimately driving sustainable development and governance improvement in the country.

Thesis Overview

1.0     INTRODUCTION

1.1     Background of the Study

In every society, there must exist some problems. These problems could be in the areas of politics, commerce, education, agriculture, communication, housing, transportation, health etc. In order to solve these problems as they might exist at given points in time, government is always seen formulating policies in response to them and in relation to the objectives of growth, national development and well being of the citizens. This is necessary because if attempts are not made to address these problems as they arise, they may degenerate into uncontrollable stages with the society’s social-economic growth and development endangered.(Okoli and Onah, 2002). For this, the scope and effects of public policy is usually very pervasive and dominant particularly in developing nations like Nigeria with a very weak private sector (Ikelegbe 2006, Abah, 2010). For instance, it is the making and implementation of public policies that determine, for instance, the level of provision of social services, the availability of financial services for economic activities, the level of industrialization, the level of employment opportunities, the level of social or economic inequality, the availability of health facilities, the level of social security, the pace of educational development etc. Fundamentally, a public policy is a government action or proposed action directed at achieving certain desired goals or objectives (Ikelegbe, 2006). In the light of a given societal problem, public policy guides and determines present and future public decisions as well as private individual or private business institutional actions, decisions or behavior. In essence, a public policy determines the activities of government and given private institutions in relation to providing services designed to solve a given problem. Usually, policies are made or formulated by the legislative arm of the government in both the federal, state or local government tiers and implemented by the public bureaucracy or designated private institutions. In most cases, however, it is the public bureaucracy that is saddled with the responsibility of policy implementation. Indeed, in virtually every country of the world, public polices are implemented primarily by the public bureaucracy and specifically by the bureaucrats or career civil servants that work in them (Ezeani, 2006). To this extent, therefore, the role of government in development is, to a very large extent, the role of the public bureaucracy (Abah, 2010). This role the public bureaucracy, plays through the effective implementation of government policies, projects and programmes aimed at achieving development goals and objectives. Most often in Nigeria, however, policies are well and brilliantly formulated but ineffectively implemented by the bureaucracy (Obodoechi, 2009; Ikelegbe, 2006). This leads to the failure of public policies to achieve their target goals and objectives and to ultimately alleviate the problems for which they were designed. Indeed, there is usually wide gaps between formulated policy goals and the achievement of those goals as a result of ineffective implementation in almost all facets of public administration in Nigeria (Ozor, 2004; Mankinde, 2005). Initially, the emphasis in the literature of policy studies was more on the policy formulation stage. In contemporary times, however, emphasis has shifted to policy implementation following the realization that effective implementation of policies is not an automatic affair (Egonmwan, 1984; Ikelegbe, 2006; Nweke, 2006). Again policy implementation has become of greater concern to its formulation particularly in developing nations like Nigeria where the government is increasingly looked upon by the citizens to effectively implement development projects and programmes and where, contrarily, ineffective implementation of policies has become very critical and worrisome. Against this back ground, and in line with the argument of Ugo and Ukpere (2011) that an adequate solution to the problem of effective policy implementation failures in Nigeria must stem logically from a rigorous examination and analysis of its causes, the study is set to look at policy implementation as a major stage in the policy process, to highlight the need and the role of public bureaucracy in effective implementation of polices, examine obstacles that constrain the effective implementation of policies by the public bureaucracy in Nigeria and to make recommendations on how to address the challenges and strengthen the capability of the Nigerian public bureaucracy towards effective implementation of formulated policies.

1.2     Statement of the Problem

Most government policies/reforms in Nigeria have failed to achieve the desired objectives because of either lopsided implementation or total failure to give effect to the motive of the policy or reform. The Nigerian Public servants have expressed doubt as to the government’s sincerity in carrying out the implementation of the monetization policy to a logical conclusion. It is expected that the reform program will minimize the massive waste, misuse, abuse and fraud that characterized the provision of fringe benefits to the public servants. The reform will encourage public servants to own personal houses; enable public servants to plan for more comfortable service life; reduce capital cost and reduce expenditure on rent as public servants who constitute majority of tenants in the urban centers would have developed their personal houses. The realization of these benefits would depend on the effectiveness of the implementation of the reform. The reform process places special strains on the civil service, which must undergo major adjustment that may increase uncertainty and lower moral in the transition period. The government has planned to down-size its workforce by 30,056 (The Guardian Sunday September 4, 2005 p.1), about 90 per cent will be the lower cadre of civil servants within the poverty bracket, especially those without basic entry qualifications for the positions they occupy. This will have adverse effect on those to be affected and will worsen the unemployment situation in the country. Thus, the exercise is elitist, both in conception and implementation. Those in the echelon of administration will enjoy higher percentage of monetized allowances. There is a very low prospect for junior workers to buy their quarters through the bidding process. Therefore, the intention of providing houses and reducing poverty of public servants will not be achieved, especially, when the junior workers constitute more than half of government workforce.

1.3     Objectives of the Study

The main objectives of the Study is to find out the challenges of implementing government policy in Nigeria, specifically the study intends to:

1. Find out the challenges of policy implementation in Nigeria
2. Analyze the effect of those challenges on Nigeria economy
3. Investigate the factors influencing those challenges
4. Proffer solutions to the challenges

1.4     Reseach Questions

The following research questions are formulated to guide this study

1. What are the challenges of policy implementation in Nigeria
2. Is there any significant effect of those challenges on Nigeria economy
3. What are the factors influencing those challenges
4. What solution can be proffered to the challenges

1.5     Research Hypothesis

Ho: there is no significant effect of those challenges on Nigeria economy

Hi: there is significant effect of those challenges on Nigeria economy

1.6     Significance of the study

The central focus of these notions of public policy is that it is a course of action arising from environmental challenges or stimuli. Monetization policy is therefore a course of action; a plan aimed at revamping the ailing economy of the country through the application of money spent on provision of incentives to public servants to the funding of social projects.

This study will also serve as an open eye to the whole economy and finally the study will serve as a reference point for other researchers who will embark on the same research topic.

1.7     Scope of the Study

This study will cover the challenges of policy implementation in Nigeria, the factors that influence those challenges on and the effect of those problems on Nigeria economy.

1.8     Limitation of the Study

The challenge of finance for the general research work will be a challenge during the course of study. However, it is believed that these constraints will be worked on by making the best use of the available materials and spending more than the necessary time in the research work. Therefore, it is strongly believed that despite this constraint, its effect on this research report will be minimal, thus, making the objective and significance of the study achievable.

1.9     Definition of Terms

Policy Implementation: can be defined as the third stage of policy cycle its means the stage of the policy process immediately after the passage of a law, or the action that will be taken to put the law into effect or that the problem will be solved