INTRODUCTION Background of the Study Decision making is a process of selecting from among a set of alternatives in the light of given objectives. It can be viewed as a mental process resulting in the selection of a course of action among several alternatives (Burker and Miller, 1999). Decision making is also defined as a judgment, a process of formulating and implementing decision a conscious selection among alternatives and a process of problem solving. The process of decision making includes the use of complex, logical and mathematical process (Okeke, 2007) Decisions are classified into policy decisions, administrative or managerial decisions and operational or executive decisions. Ogbonnaya (2002) defined policy decisions as decisions made by public officials which give direction to public policy actions. While administrative decisions are decisions which determine the means to be used in achieving organizational goals (Obi, 2003). Operational decisions according to Okeke (2007) are decisions which are made on daily basis a cases arise. He added that executive or operational decisions are concerned with the ways in which different programmes of the institutions are carried out. Administration is a process of coordinating the efforts of human and material resources systematically to achieve set goals (Ezeocha, 1990) while management is defined by Peretomode (1996) as a social and interactional process 1 14 14 involving a sequence of coordinated events planning, organizing, coordinating and controlling or leading in order to use available resources to achieve a desired goal in the fastest possible way. Administration and management are related because both involve the coordination of human and material resources to achieve set goals in any organization. However management is more embracing in the sense that it involve planning, organizing, controlling, leading among others while administration involve more of the coordination of human and material resources in the process of implementing programme (Ejiogu, 1990). In this study, however management and administration mean the same thing. Administrative decisions making in educational institutions are normally embarked upon by university administrators, provost, or principals for the day to day running of their institutions (Obi, 2003). In the universities in particular administrative decisions covers such areas as regulation of teaching and learning activities courses assigned to faculty staff, promotion of research, admission of students, students discipline, welfare of students, and the regulation of their conduct, budgeting and spending (Okeke, 2007). These decisions are made by university administrators and staff. However administrative decision-making for students participation in this study covers students representation in the disciplinary committees of their universities, students participation in formulation of rules and regulation on students’ union government, students participation in administrative decision-making on accommodation matters, students participation 15 15 in decision-making on internally generated revenue like tuition fee development fee, examination fee, library fee, and students participation in administrative decision-making on the selection of students leaders. In his decision making theory called competencies decision making theory Abbot (1974) taught that leaders should identify and differentiate between types of decisions in an organization, determine the type of information needed for the decision and consider the involvement of all stake holders in the institution in making decisions in order to avoid the negative consequences of taking decisions without the consideration of some stake holders in organizations. The researcher therefore anchored this study on Abbot competencies decision-making theory and on Hodgett and Altman (1979) bounded rationality decision making theory which seek to identify and select the best alternative from different organizational temperament and experiences before a decision is made. It should be noted that the desire of the federal and state governments to provide higher education for her citizens has led to the establishment of universities in all parts of Nigeria. The major aims of which are to produce high level manpower for overall national development, to inculcate the best values for the survival of individual and society, to develop the intellectual capacity of individual to understand and appreciate their local and external environment among others. (FRN, 2004).
Table Of Contents
Thesis Abstract
<p>
</p><p>This study sought to examine the due process compliance by the federal and state<br>inspectorate of education in the North Central Zone of Nigeria. Five research questions<br>and five null hypothesis (tested at p<05) guided the study. The design of the study was a<br>descriptive survey. The sample was made up of 306 respondents comprising 116<br>inspectors of education and 190 school heads from the North Central Zone of Nigeria.</p><p>Questionnaire titled due process compliance questionnaire (DPCQ) was the instruments<br>used in the study to elicit opinions of the respondents on the due process compliance by<br>federal and state inspectorate. The items of the questionnaire were validated by experts<br>from Faculty of Education University of Nigeria, Nsukka. The internal consistency<br>reliability of the (DPCQ) was established using Cronbach Alpha procedure and<br>reliability coefficient estimate of 0.62, 0.54, 0.51, and 0.80 respectively was obtained.<br>The data obtained were analyzed using mean scores, standard deviation and t-test<br>statistics. Major findings, of the study include the inspectors of education and school<br>heads agreed that due process practices were complied with in the personnel<br>administration of the federal and state inspectorate service in such areas like recruitment<br>of inspectors; posting and transfer of inspectorate staff not being punitive; promotion<br>based on year of experience; specialist posting to zones; planning; in-service training<br>and supervision of the performance of the inspectors by stakeholders; and recognition<br>visits; due process practices were complied with in financial management activities such<br>as payment of staff salaries and other allowances; involving subordinates in budget<br>preparation; regular conduct of yearly auditing; effective monitoring of project fund;<br>management of cash flow; proper recording of financial matters and preparation of<br>annual account; the major problems facing the North Central Zone of the inspectorate of<br>education in due process compliance were accommodation constraints; lack of running<br>cost; poor road network; inadequate inspectors in some specific subject areas;<br>monitoring the distribution of stationeries and office equipment; poor communication of<br>information and management skills; and inability to act on complaints; the inspectors<br>and school heads differed significantly on due process practices complied with to<br>improve the functions and code of conduct for inspectors such as organizing seminars;<br>workshops and conferences; training skills; making inspection materials available;<br>giving allowances and incentives to inspectors; both inspectors and school heads<br>however agreed on reviewing the existing guidelines for school inspection in order to<br>improve the functions and code of conduct of the inspectors; both inspectors and school<br>heads agreed on the perceived strategies to improve due process practices for inspectors<br>such as punctuality to duty; prudent management of fund; publishing annual state of<br>education; accurate and reliable report; and confidentiality of information. Among the<br>educational implications of the findings of the study was that the recruitment of<br>inspectors could be based not just on showing of certificates alone, but this could be<br>combined with recruitment examinations which would expose the applicants to realities<br>of their jobs. It was thus recommended that the recruitment of inspectors should be based<br>not just on showing of certificates alone, but this should be combined with recruitment<br>examinations which would expose the applicants to realities of their jobs.<br>13<br>13</p>
<br><p></p>
Thesis Overview
<p>
</p><div><p><strong>INTRODUCTION</strong></p><p><strong>Background of the Study</strong></p><p>The Federal Government of Nigeria has adopted education as an instrument<br>“par excellence” for effecting national development. The Federal Republic of<br>Nigeria in the National Policy on Education (FRN, 2004) states that any successful<br>system of education must be hinged on proper planning, efficient administration,<br>good organization and adequate financing. This demand the due process<br>compliance of the inspectorate of education. The Public Procurement Act (2007)<br>looked at Due Process as a mechanism for ensuring strict compliance in other to<br>harmonize and update the rules and procedures that should guide the<br>implementation of educational policy and contract award with the federal<br>government of Nigeria.</p><p>Nigerian since the early 80s has been confronted with magnitude of<br>educational problems. This problem in brief include low priority accorded to<br>inspection Un-wanted interference in the school administration by the political<br>leaders, multiplication of school with few inspectors, refusal to implement the laid<br>down plan and poor financial management practices, Nigeria therefore has been<br>battling with how to achieve its major educational objectives. These objectives<br>1<br>14<br>14<br>include improving educational standard, quality assurance and reformation of the<br>federal and state inspectorate of education. It has not been easy for Nigeria to<br>realize the above objectives some of the factors responsible for this are poor<br>performance because of the following reasons: Unwillingness of stake holders in<br>education to enforce innovation due to political instability, misplacement of<br>priorities, shortage of basic infrastructural amenities and utilities and problem of<br>qualified personnel government use due process policy and implementation<br>mechanism to address a number of issues. Including budget implementation<br>service delivery, quality assurance, reformation of the inspectorate of education<br>and several developmental concerns.</p><p>Due process started by the budget monitoring and price intelligence unit<br>under madam Obiageli Ezekwesili 2007. Anumber of new rules and standards have<br>been put in place by the inspectorate while there have been effort at sensitizing the<br>state branches of the federal inspectorate of the education. The prime objective of<br>the Due process is to harmonize and update all the federal and state inspectorate of<br>education policies and practices on inspection. Also to strictly enforce the Due<br>process principles of transparency, in other to ensure efficient and integrity based<br>monitoring of the implementation of FIS and SIE guide line with Due process<br>principles.<br>15</p></div><h3></h3><br>
<br><p></p>