INVESTIGATING THE IMPACTS OF RECYCLED WATER ON LONG LIVED CONIFERS
Table Of Contents
Thesis Abstract
<p></p>
<b>ABSTARCT </b><div>Recycled wastewater is a popular alternative water resource. Recycled water typically has higher salinity
than potable water and therefore may not be an appropriate water source for landscapes planted with salt-intolerant
plant species. Coast redwoods (Sequoia sempervirens) are an important agricultural, horticultural and ecological
species assumed to be salt intolerant. However, no studies have analysed how salinity impacts coast redwood
growth. To determine salt-related growth limitations, as well as susceptibility to particular salt ions, we divided 102
S. sempervirens ‘Aptos Blue’ saplings evenly into 17 salinity treatments a control and four different salts (sodium
chloride, calcium chloride, sodium chloride combined with calcium chloride, and sodium sulfate). Each salt type
was applied at four different concentrations 1.0, 3.0, 4.5 and 6.0 dS m21
. Trees were measured for relative growth,
and leaves were analysed for ion accumulation. Results showed that the relative stem diameter growth was inversely
proportional to the increase in salinity (electrical conductivity), with R2 values ranging from 0.72 to 0.82 for different
salts. Analysis of variance tests indicated that no particular salt ion significantly affected growth differently than the
others (P . 0.1). Pairwise comparisons of the means revealed that moderately saline soils (4–8 dS m21
) would
decrease the relative height growth by 30–40 %. Leaf tissue analysis showed that all treatment groups accumulated
salt ions. This finding suggests reduced growth and leaf burn even at the lowest ion concentrations if salts are not
periodically leached from the soil. Regardless of the specific ions in the irrigation water, the results suggest that growth
and appearance of coast redwoods will be negatively impacted when recycled water electrical conductivity exceeds
.1.0 dS m21
. This information will prove valuable to many metropolitan areas faced with conserving water while at
the same time maintaining healthy verdant landscapes that include coast redwoods and other long-lived conifers.
Keywords California; drought; Mediterranean climate; reclaimed water; urban forestry; urban horticulture.
<p>
<br></p></div>
Thesis Overview
<p>
<b></b></p>
<b><i></i>1. INTRODUCTION</b> <div>Water used to irrigate important verdant, social landscapes (e.g. arboreta, public parks and golf courses)
faces competition with other uses of fresh water including
increasing agricultural and urban demands (Hamilton
et al. 2005). Recycled wastewater has been highlighted
as one of the most affordable alternative resources for
agricultural, industrial and urban non-potable purposes
in arid and semi-arid regions like California, where current
fresh water reserves are at a critical limit (Lazarova et al.
2001). In California natural prolonged periods of summer
drought have been exacerbated in recent years by low winter rainfall. California’s 2014 Water Year, which ended
30 September 2014 was the third driest in 199 years of
record; and was the warmest year on record (USGS
2015). In addition, California’s population is estimated to
increase by 15.4 million residents (a 39 % increase) over
the next 50 years (Palmer and Schooling 2013). Both the
rise in population and the uneven distribution of these
new inhabitants will cause an increase in water demand
(Hanak and Davis 2006). </div><div><br></div><div>To mitigate the effects of
increased competition for limited potable water, horticulturalists and municipalities in California and in arid and
semi-arid climates around the world are developing
sources of recycled wastewater (Hamilton et al. 2005;
Miller 2006; Toze 2006).
Types of waste waters used for recycling include treated
and untreated sewage effluent, storm water runoff,
domestic grey water and industrial wastewater (Toze
2006). Although recycled water meets many social and
environmental objectives by reducing competition for
fresh water, there are some drawbacks that make it less
suitable than potable water for horticultural applications.
Primarily, recycled water often has a greater salt concentration than potable water. </div><div><br></div><div>Although the salinity of
recycled water is not usually high enough to make it
unsuitable for irrigation (Vartanian 2008), it can contain
10 times more salt (e.g. 1.0–2.0 dS m21
) than potable
water (0.1 dS m21
). Thus, recycled water can be harmful to salt-intolerant plants (Maas 1986).
Salinity in low concentrations (,2.0 dS m21
) has been
shown to have adverse effects on growth and physiology
of many plants (Kozlowski 1997; Chaves et al. 2009).
Salinity impacts plant growth by decreasing the osmotic
potential of the soil and imposing physiological drought,
or through toxic effects from high concentrations of particular ions, such as sodium or chloride that can injure the
plant (Chaves et al. 2009). Although there is an extensive
literature on the negative effect of salt on plant growth
for many agricultural crops (Sohan et al. 1999; Sultana
et al. 1999; Katerji et al. 2003; Zheng et al. 2008), there
is a limited amount of information quantifying growth
responses to salt for important horticultural species. In
particular, there is only one report published about the
salt tolerance of the coast redwood tree (Sequoia sempervirens) (Wu and Guo 2006), which is surprising given this
species’ important ecological and horticultural value.
The coast redwood is emblematic of western US conifers known for its towering height (.100 m) and longevity (.1500 years). This charismatic tree species’ native
range extends along the fog-belt of the Pacific coast
from southern Oregon to central California. The coast redwood is an important timber species, prized in building for
its burnt-sienna coloured wood that is naturally decay
resistant. Coast redwoods are also used extensively in
Pacific horticulture (CA, OR, WA), in public parks, golf
courses, highways and private landscapes; and are popular
horticultural specimens used throughout the USA and
in temperate climates around the world. Although the
coast redwood is indigenous within a Mediterranean
climate, which is typified by long periods of summer
drought, coast redwoods thrive in areas with significant
summertime moisture, typically derived from abundant
marine fog. Moisture input from fog drip in the summer
can constitute 30 % or more of the total water input
each year (Dawson 1998). </div><div>The coast redwood is characterized as having low to moderate drought tolerance (Sunset
Books 2000) and requires supplemental irrigation where
fog or summer precipitation events are lacking. Without
natural precipitation (rain or fog) or supplemental irrigation, dry summer conditions may inhibit the performance
of mature individuals of coast redwood in urban settings
where signs of water stress often include leaf senescence
and stem die back (Litvak et al. 2011) (Fig. 1).
The work presented herein was initiated to fill a knowledge gap by determining the level of tolerance of coast
redwood to sodium and chloride. The research was
designed in response to reports from water districts in
the San Francisco Bay Area, which claimed that coast redwoods within public parks had shown signs of decline or
death after irrigation with recycled water. To determine
the effects of sodium and chloride ions on the growth
and health of redwoods, Sequoia sempervirens ‘Aptos
Blue’ specimens were placed in a greenhouse and irrigated daily with one of 17 treatments represented by a
non-saline nutrient solution that was used as the control
treatment plus four different salt solutions at four different concentrations. We hypothesized that redwoods
would be classifiable as a ‘salt-sensitive’ species, demonstrated by declines in growth at soil salinity concentrations
,3.0 dS m21
. Further, we hypothesized that different salt
solutions would be more toxic than others, represented by
statistically different growth responses.</div><div><br></div><div>
<b>2.</b> <b>DESIGN METHOD</b></div><div>The experiment was conducted in a glasshouse at the UC
Davis Environmental Horticulture Complex (Davis, CA, USA).
Greenhouse daytime low and high temperatures were
maintained between 21 and 24 8C, and night-time low
and high temperatures were maintained between 13 and
17 8C. No artificial lighting was supplied to the plants. The
glasshouse was divided into two blocks to control for natural gradients of sunlight, temperature and humidity. Pots
were placed 1 m apart throughout the two blocks. One
hundred and two Sequoia sempervirens ‘Aptos Blue’ saplings in 8 L pots (21 cm tall, with a 21 cm diameter tapering to 18.5 cm) were obtained from Generation Growers,
Modesto, CA, USA. Potting media contained a mix of
humus and sand in a 4 : 1 volumetric ratio, 6.0 kg m23
dolomite, 0.6 kg m23 calcium nitrate, 1.2 kg m23 ferrous
sulfate heptahydrate, 3.0 kg m23 nitroform, 2.4 kg m23
double super phosphate and 1.2 kg m23 oyster shell lime.
The salinity treatments consisted of a control, as well as
four different salts: sodium chloride (NaCl), calcium chloride (CaCl2), sodium chloride and calcium chloride (NaCl +
CaCl2) and sodium sulfate (Na2SO4). </div><div><br></div><div>Each salt was applied
at four different concentrations represented by electrical
conductivity (EC) of 1.0, 3.0, 4.5 and 6.0 dS m21
. NaCl was
selected because it is the most common salt in recycled
water. Na2SO4 was used to isolate Na symptoms, whereas
CaCl2 served to isolate Cl symptoms. The combination of
NaCl and CaCl2 provided a treatment simulating environmental conditions, where combinations of monovalent
and multivalent cations would be present in the irrigation
water and/or soil. Each salt type was added to a onequarter strength Hoagland’s fertilizer ‘Solution 2’ which
had an EC of 0.5 dS m21 (Epstein and Bloom 2005). The
control treatment received only the modified Hoagland’s,
without additional salt. Six trees were replicated in
each of 17 treatments. Treatments were initialized on
15 October 2005.
Dosatronw DI-16 injectors (Dosatron USA, Clearwater,
FL, USA) were used to mix the salinity treatments
into the irrigation water. Three Netafimw Woodpecker
pressure-compensating emitters (Netafim Irrigation,
Fresno, CA, USA, rated 4 L h21
) at each pot produced an
average total flow rate of 12.8 L h21 (SE ¼ 0.08, n ¼ 9).
Multiple emitters at each pot allowed for uniform saturation of the container medium. Daily irrigations were </div><div><br></div><div>
Table 1. Mean (+SE) cumulative treatment and leachate EC values
from the testing period 12 July 2005 to 1 September 2007. A leaching
fraction of 0.4–0.5 was applied to all treatments independently.
Irrigation treatment salinity concentrations were evaluated weekly
by collecting solute from an emitter tube at each tree prior to the
day’s irrigation cycle. </div><div><br></div><div>Treatment Cumulative mean
treatment EC
Cumulative mean
leachate EC</div><div><u> (dS m21)+1 SE (dS m21)+1 SE </u></div><div><br></div><div>Control 0.5 dS m21 0.57+0.01 0.66+0.01 </div><div>NaCl 1.0 dS m21 1.05+0.01 1.67+0.05 </div><div>NaCl 3.0 dS m21 3.12+0.03 4.52+0.11 </div><div>NaCl 4.5 dS m21 4.32+0.05 5.71+0.11 </div><div>NaCl 6.0 dS m21 5.72+0.08 7.08+0.12 </div><div>CaCl2 1.0 dS m21 1.06+0.01 1.54+0.02 </div><div>CaCl2 3.0 dS m21 2.95+0.02 5.08+0.13 </div><div>CaCl2 4.5 dS m21 4.52+0.04 7.10+0.16 </div><div>CaCl2 6.0 dS m21 6.12+0.04 8.83+0.17</div><div> NaCl + CaCl2 1.0 dS m21 1.09+0.01 1.61+0.03 </div><div>NaCl + CaCl2 3.0 dS m21 2.94+0.03 4.60+0.11 </div><div>NaCl + CaCl2 4.5 dS m21 4.59+0.03 6.83+0.16 </div><div>NaCl + CaCl2 6.0 dS m21 6.10+0.04 8.40+0.15 </div><div>Na2SO4 1.0 dS m21 1.09+0.01 1.73+0.05 </div><div>Na2SO4 3.0 dS m21 3.10+0.04 4.68+0.11 </div><div>Na2SO4 4.5 dS m21 4.71+0.01 6.08+0.09 </div><div>Na2SO4 6.0 dS m21 6.10+0.02 7.37+0.11 </div><div><br></div><div>
scheduled with a Hunterw ICC irrigation timer (Hunter
Industries Inc., San Marcos, CA, USA). A leaching fraction
of 0.4–0.5 was applied to all treatments independently.
The leaching fraction is defined as the ratio of the quantity of water draining past the root zone to that infiltrated
into the soil’s surface. This fraction was used to isolate
symptoms related to the salt treatments by eliminating
stress due to both insufficient water and increasing container EC due to evapo-transpiration. Further, this leaching
fraction was designed to provide sufficient irrigation
treatment volume to allow for uniform saturation of the
container medium. Irrigation treatment salinity concentrations were evaluated weekly by collecting solute
from the emitter tube at each tree during the day’s irrigation cycle. After the irrigation cycle, a portable meter was
used to test the EC and pH of each sample leachate
(Table 1).
</div><div><br></div><div>
<b><i>Data collection </i></b></div><div>Stem diameter and stem length (i.e. tree height) were
measured every second week starting on 25 September
2005 and ending 3 January 2007. A set of digital calipers
(Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) was placed around
the trunk at a height of 3 cm above the potting medium in
a constant orientation for each tree. The trunk was
marked to indicate the points of contact for the calipers
and the diameter was measured across these points
each time. Tree height was evaluated every third week
starting 15 September 2005 and ending 8 January
2007. Height was measured with a tape from an indicated
point on the pot rim to the apex of the central leader of
the tree. </div><div><br></div><div>
The concentration of salt ions accumulated in the
leaves was determined from analyses of leaves sampled
from the previous flush of growth. These leaves were
identified as originating from lignifying stem segments
occurring directly behind the youngest, light green leaves
on solid green stems. Consistency of tissue maturity has
been shown to be an important characteristic for obtaining comparable results (Mills and Jones 1996). Leaf
tissue-sampling events occurred on 17 October 2005, 9
January 2006, 18 May 2006, 22 September 2006 and 15
January 2007. The experiment was terminated shortly
after the fifth sampling. Both proximal (P) and distal (D)
leaf blade sections were collected on each date. The distal
portions of leaves were removed first; the halfway cut
point was determined visually. Then the basal sections
of the cut leaves were removed by cutting them as closely
to the stem as possible. A minimum of 1.5 g dry weight
(3.8 g fresh weight, 39 % dry: fresh weight ratio) was collected for each sample. The dried samples were analysed
for % Ca+, % Cl2 and % Na+ by using the ‘Nitric/Perchloric
Wet Ashing Open Vessel’ (P – 3.10) technique, and Cl was
analysed using the ‘2 % Acetic Acid Extraction’ (P – 4.20)
technique by Dellavallew Laboratory, Inc. (Fresno, CA,
USA). Ion accumulation rates were evaluated for the
different concentrations within each salinity treatment
type (e.g. 1.0 dS m21 NaCl vs. 6.0 dS m21 NaCl), as well
as within treatment concentration level between the
various salinity treatment types (e.g. 1.0 dS m21 NaCl
vs. 1.0 dS m21 CaCl2).
<br>
<p>
<br></p></div>