Thesis Abstract

Abstract
The rapid advancement of technology has led to the adoption of cashless policies in many countries, aiming to reduce the dependence on physical currency and promote digital transactions. This study examines the impact of cashless policy on banks' liquidity, focusing on how the shift towards electronic payments affects the liquidity position of banks. The research analyzes data from various banks before and after the implementation of cashless policies to determine the changes in their liquidity levels. The findings suggest that the adoption of cashless policies has both positive and negative implications for banks' liquidity. On the one hand, the shift towards digital transactions can improve liquidity management for banks by reducing the need for physical cash reserves and streamlining payment processes. This can lead to cost savings and operational efficiencies for banks, ultimately enhancing their liquidity positions. On the other hand, the transition to cashless transactions can also pose challenges for banks in terms of managing liquidity. Electronic payment systems may introduce new risks related to cyber threats and operational disruptions, which can impact banks' liquidity management strategies. Additionally, the reliance on digital platforms for transactions may expose banks to liquidity risks associated with system outages or technical failures. Furthermore, the study explores the implications of cashless policies on traditional banking services and the overall financial ecosystem. The research highlights the need for banks to adapt their liquidity management practices to accommodate the changing landscape of digital payments. By investing in robust infrastructure and risk management systems, banks can mitigate the liquidity risks associated with cashless policies and capitalize on the opportunities for enhancing liquidity through digital channels. In conclusion, the impact of cashless policy on banks' liquidity is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires careful consideration of the benefits and challenges involved. While the transition to digital payments can offer opportunities for improving liquidity management, banks must also address the potential risks and vulnerabilities associated with cashless transactions. By adopting a proactive approach to liquidity management and embracing technological advancements, banks can navigate the changing financial landscape effectively and ensure their liquidity resilience in a cashless economy.

Thesis Overview

INTRODUCTION

1.1   BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY

Cashless economy is an economy where transaction can be done without necessarily carrying physical cash as a mean of exchange of transaction but rather with the use of credit or debit card payment for goods and services. Omotunde et al (2013) posits that cashless economy policy initiative of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) is a move to improve the financial terrain but in the long run sustainability of the policy will be a function of endorsement and compliance by end-users which can which can be aimed at reducing bank liquidity risks. According to Tunde Lemon, the Deputy Governor of CBN, the CBN cash policy stipulates a daily cumulative limit of N150, 000 and N1, 000, 000 on free cash withdrawals and lodgments by individual and corporate customers respectively in the Lagos state since March 30, 2012. Individuals and corporate organizations that make cash transactions above the limits will be charged a service fee for amounts above the cumulative limits. Furthermore, 3rd party cheques above N150, 000 shall not be eligible for encashment over the counter with effect from January 1, 2012. Value for such cheques shall be received through the clearing house. All Nigerian banks were expected to cease cash in transit lodgment services rendered to merchants and customers from January 1, 2012. Omotunde et al (2013) further clarified that the policy through the advanced use of information technology facilitates fund transfer, thereby reducing time wasted in Bank(s). Wizzit, a fast growing mobile banking company in South Africa has over three hundred thousand customers across South Africa. Likewise, M-PESA was introduced in Kenya as a small value electronic system that is accessible from ordinary mobile phones. According to them, it has experienced exceptional growth since its introduction by mobile phone operator (Safaricam) in Kenya in March, 2007 and has already been adopted by nine million customers, which is about 40% of Kenya‟s adult population. Wizzit and other mobile financial services including M-PESA in Kenya are helping low income Africans make financial transaction across long distance with their cell-phones, thereby reducing their travel cost and eliminating the risks of carrying cash and also avoiding most banking charges (Akintaro, 2012).

Banks play a central role in all modern financial systems. To perform it effectively, banks must be safe and be perceived as such. The single most important assurance is for the economic value of a bank’s assets to be worth significantly more than the liabilities that it owes. The difference represents a cushion of “capital” that is available to cover losses of any kind. However, the recent financial crisis underlined the importance of a second type of buffer, the “liquidity” that banks have to cover unexpected cash outflows. A bank can be solvent, holding assets exceeding its liabilities on an economic and accounting basis, and still die a sudden death if its depositors and other funders lose confidence in the institution.

In banking, liquidity is the ability to meet obligations when they come due without incurring unacceptable losses (Odior & Banuso, 2012). Managing liquidity is a daily process requiring bankers to monitor and project cash flows to ensure adequate liquidity is maintained. Maintaining a balance between short-term assets and short-term liabilities is critical. For an individual bank, clients’ deposits are its primary liabilities (in the sense that the bank is meant to give back all client deposits on demand), whereas reserves and loans are its primary assets (in the sense that these loans are owed to the bank, not by the bank). The investment portfolio represents a smaller portion of assets, and serves as the primary source of liquidity. Investment securities can be liquidated to satisfy deposit withdrawals and increased loan demand. Banks have several additional options for generating liquidity, such as selling loans, borrowing from other banks, borrowing from a central bank, such as the US Federal Reserve bank, and raising additional capital. In a worst-case scenario, depositors may demand their funds when the bank is unable to generate adequate cash without incurring substantial financial losses. In severe cases, this may result in a bank run. Most banks are subject to legally mandated requirements intended to help avoid a liquidity crisis.

1.2   STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Banks can generally maintain as much liquidity as desired because bank deposits are insured by governments in most developed countries. A lack of liquidity can be remedied by raising deposit rates and effectively marketing deposit products. However, an important measure of a bank’s value and success is the cost of liquidity. A bank can attract significant liquid funds. Lower costs generate stronger profits, more stability, and more confidence among depositors, investors, and regulators. This is the first research that is examining the relationship between the cashless policy and bank liquidity in Nigeria.

1.3   OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The following are the objectives of this study:

1. To examine the impact of cashless policy on banks liquidity.
2. To examine the effect of cashless policy on the Nigerian economy.
3. To find out the challenges confronting cashless policy in Nigeria.

1.4   RESEARCH QUESTIONS

1. What is the impact of cashless policy on banks liquidity?
2. What is the effect of cashless policy on the Nigerian economy?
3. What are the challenges confronting cashless policy in Nigeria?

1.5   HYPOTHESIS

HO: There is no significant relationship between cashless policy and bank liquidity

HA: There is significant relationship between cashless policy and bank liquidity

1.6   SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The following are the significance of this study:

1. The outcome of this study will educate the bankers and other stakeholders in the management of banks on the relationship between cashless policy and bank liquidity.
2. This research will be a contribution to the body of literature in the area of the effect of personality trait on student’s academic performance, thereby constituting the empirical literature for future research in the subject area.

1.7   SCOPE/LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

This study will cover the relationship between cashless policy and bank liquidity.

LIMITATION OF STUDY

Financial constraint– Insufficient fund tends to impede the efficiency of the researcher in sourcing for the relevant materials, literature or information and in the process of data collection (internet, questionnaire and interview).

Time constraint– The researcher will simultaneously engage in this study with other academic work. This consequently will cut down on the time devoted for the research work.