ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF SESAME PRODUCTION AMONG SMALL- HOLDER FARMERS IN BENUE STATE, NIGERIA
Table Of Contents
<p>
</p><p> <b>TABLE OF CONTENTS </b></p><p><b>Contents Pages </b></p><p>TITLE PAGE…………………………………………………………………………….i</p><p> DECLARATION………………………………………………………………………..ii </p><p>CERTIFICATION…………………………………………………………………........iii </p><p>DEDICATION…………………………………………………………..……...............iv </p><p>ACKNOWLEDGEMENT…………………………………………………..……..……v </p><p>TABLE OF CONTENT…...……………………………………………………………vi </p><p>LISTS OF TABLES…………………………………………………………………....vii </p><p>LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………viii </p><p>LIST OF APPENDICES……………………………………………………………....ix </p><p>ABSTRACT……………………………………………………...……………….….. x <br></p><p><b>
Chapter ONE
…………………………………………………..………………….1</b></p><p> INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………….…………..….1 </p><p>1.1 Background to the Study…………………………………………………..….1 </p><p>1.2 Problem Statement........................................................................…..........3 </p><p>1.3 Objectives of the Study…………………………………………………............6 </p><p>1.4 Justification of the Study……………………………….……………………….6 </p><p>1.5 Hypotheses………………………………………………………………………7 </p><p>5.4 Limitation of the study ……………..….……………………………………….7 <br></p><p><b>
Chapter TWO
………..…………………………………………………………….8</b> </p><p>LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………………………………………8 </p><p>2.1 Origin and Morphology of Sesame……………………………………………...9 </p><p>2.2. Economic Importance of Sesame ………………………………….………….11 </p><p>2.3 Sesame Production in Nigeria………….. ...……………………………...…...12 </p><p>2.4 The concept of Efficiency in Agricultural Production ….………………….…14 </p><p>2.5 Measurement of Production Efficiency…………………………………….…16 </p><p>2.5.1 The Non- parametric Approach: Data Envelop Analysis………………..16 </p><p>2.5.2 The Parametric Approach: Stochastic Frontier Models………………….……19 <br></p><p>2.6 Empirical Application of Stochastic Frontier Production Function In Efficiency and Economics studies………………………………………...........................................................22 </p><p>2.7 Profitability Analysis…....……………………………………………………...23 </p><p>2.8 Constraints Associated with Sesame Production……………………………....24 </p><p><b>
Chapter THREE
…………………………………………………………………..28 </b></p><p>METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………………….28 </p><p>3.1 Study Area…………………………………………………………..................28 </p><p>3.2 Sampling Procedure…………………………………………….……………...30 </p><p>3.3 Data Collection .…………….……..…………………………………………..30 </p><p>3.4.1 Descriptive Statistics …………………………………………………………..31 </p><p>3.4.2 Net Farm Income …….…………..……………………………………….…...32 </p><p>3.4.3 Stochastic Frontier Cobb-Douglas Production Function………………………33 </p><p>3.4.4 Stochastic Frontier Cobb-Douglas Cost Function………….………………….34 </p><p>3.4.5 Definition of Variable and their A prori Expectation………………..………...36 </p><p><b>
Chapter FOUR
……………………………………………………………………41 </b></p><p>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………………………………………41 </p><p>4.1 Socio-economic characteristics of Respondents………………………………41 </p><p>4.1.1 Sex of the Respondents…………………………………………………..……41 </p><p>4.1.2 Marital Status...…………………………………………...................................41</p><p> 4.1.3 Age Distribution………………….………………………………….................42 </p><p>4.1.4 Level of Education……………………………………………………………..42 </p><p>4.1.5 Household Size...……………………………………………………………….43 </p><p>4.1.6 Extension Visit ………………………………………………………………...44 </p><p>4.1.7 Farm Size……… ……………………………………………………………....44 </p><p>4.1.8 Farming Experience ….………………………………………………………...45 </p><p>4.1.9 Membership of cooperative Society …………………………………………...46 </p><p>4.1.10 Access to Credit ………….…………………………………………………....46 </p><p>4.2 Cost and Return Analysis………………………………………………………47 </p><p>4.2.1 Cost of Production …………………………………………………………….47 </p><p>4.2.2 Returns ………………………………………………………………………...48 <br></p><p>4.3 Estimates of Stochastic Frontier Production Function ………..………………50 </p><p>4.3.1 Determinants of Technical Inefficiency ……………….……….……………...53 </p><p>4.3.2 The Estimates of Stochastic Cost Function …………………..……………….55 </p><p>4.3.3 Determinants of Allocative Inefficiencies ……………………………………..57 </p><p>4.3.4 Distribution of Farm-specific Efficiency Levels among Sesame Farmers …….58 </p><p>4.3.4.1 Technical Efficiency …………………………………………………………...58 </p><p>4.3.4.2 Allocative Efficiency …………………………………………………………..58 </p><p>4.3.4.3 Economic Efficiency …………………………………………………………..59 <br></p><p>4.4 Constraints Associated with Sesame Production ………………………………61 </p><p><b>
Chapter FIVE
…………………………………………………………………..64 </b></p><p>SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS…………………..64 </p><p>5.1 Summary………………………………………………………………………..64</p><p> 5.2 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………....65 </p><p>5.3 Contribution to Knowledge ……………………………………………..……..66 </p><p>5.5 Recommendation ………………………………………………………………66</p><p> REFERENCES…………………………………………………………….......68 </p>
<br><p></p>
Thesis Abstract
<p> <b>ABSTRACT </b></p><p>The broad objective of the study was to examine the Economics of Sesame Production
among small-holder famers in Benue State, Nigeria. Specifically, the study examined
the socio-economic characteristics of farmers in the study area, profitability, technical,
allocative and economic efficiencies and constraints of sesame production in the study
area. A multi-stage sampling procedure was used to randomly select 180 farmers from
12 villages in the state. Primary data were collected using structured questionnaire and
analyzed using net farm income and stochastic frontier production function. The results
revealed that majority (85.6%) of the farmers were male with a mean age of 37. About
97.8% of the respondents were literate with a mean farm size of 3.13 hectares. The
gross farm income, net farm income per hectare and the return per every naira invested
were found to be of N121, 435.20, N67,261.95 and N1.24. Labour was the most
prominent cost item and it accounts for 57.85% of the total cost. The estimate of the
technical efficiency indicates that farm size was positive and statistically significant at
1% while the coefficients for fertilizer and herbicide were statistically significant at 5%
and 10% level of probability. Farming experience, extension contact and membership of
cooperative society were found to influence technical efficiency. The analysis of
allocative efficiency revealed that seed, fertilizer and herbicide were all statistically
significantly at 1%. The inefficiency model indicates that education, farming experience
and extension service were significantly related to allocative efficiency. The mean
technical, allocative and economic efficiencies estimates were 0.712, 0.968 and 0.689
respectively. The major problems encountered by the sesame farmers in the study area
were inadequate capital (80.5%), poor market pricing (76.7%) and lack of modern
cleaning facilities (73.9%). There is a need for farmers to form cooperative organisation
so as improve their access to production inputs and enhance their marketing efficiency.
Also, strengthening the present extension service will increase efficiency in the long
term.
<br></p>
Thesis Overview
<p>
<b>INTRODUCTION </b></p><p><b>1.1 Background to the Study </b></p><p>Available statistics show that agriculture is the most important Nigerian economic
sector in terms of its contribution to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), after oil. The
sector contributes about 41% to the country‟s GDP, employs about 65% of the total
population and provides employment to about 80% of the rural population. Agriculture
is a major source of food and meat. It is estimated that some 25 million hectares of land
are cultivated each year by small holders for food production and hence the sector plays
an important role in rural livelihood. It is estimated that it accounts for about 70% of
rural household‟s total incomes (Ogen, 2003). Agricultural growth in Nigeria is
increasingly recognized to be central to sustained improvement in economic
development. The sector plays a crucial role in food security, poverty alleviation and
human development chain in Nigeria (Aye and Oboh, 2006).
According to the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2012), Smallholder
farmers are defined in various ways depending on the context, country and even
ecological zone. It is often interchangeably used with „small-scale, „resource poor‟ and
sometimes „peasant farmer‟. In general terms smallholder only refers to their limited
resource endowment relative to other farmers in the sector. It can be defined as those
farmers owning small-based plots of land on which they grow subsistence crops and one
or two cash crops relying almost exclusively on family labour.
One of the main characteristics of the production systems of smallholder farmers are
simple outdated technologies, low returns and high seasonal labour fluctuations. These
smallholder farmers differ in individual characteristics, farm size, resource distribution
between food and cash crops, livestock and off-farm activities, their use of external
inputs and hired labour, the proportion of food crops sold and household expenditure
patterns (DAFF, 2012). </p><p>
In Nigeria, small-holder farmers constitute about 80% of the farming population
(Awoke and Akorji, 2004). According to them, small-holder farmers are those farmers
who produce on a small scale, not involved in commercial agriculture but produce on a
subsistence level, and cultivate less than five hectares annually on the average. Smallholder and family farming agriculture remains the key and leading sector in economic
development of many developing countries in the world (Quan, 2011). According to
Quan (2011), in addition to producing staple food for domestic markets, small-holder
farmers produce larger share of traditional export in these countries, hence, the
economy of many developing countries is still reliant on small-holder agriculture. The
agricultural sector in Nigeria is dominated by small-holder farmers who produce the
bulk of the food requirements in the country (Asogwa, Umeh and Penda, 2011).
<br></p><p>
Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) otherwise known as sesamum or benniseed, a member of
the family padaliaceae, is one of the most ancient oil seed known to mankind. Sesame
plays a major role in human nutrition. Most of the sesame seeds are used for oil
extraction and the rest are used for edible purposes (El Khier, Ishag and Yagoub, 2008).
Sesame is widely grown in the northern and central part of Nigeria as a minor crop
initially until in 1974 when it became a major cash earner in many northern states such
as Benue, Nasarawa, Jigawa, Kano, Katsina, Plateau and Yobe States and in Abuja, the
Federal Capital Territory of Nigeria (NAERLS, 2010). Sesame is commonly grown by
small-holder farmers in the major producing States of Benue, Nasarawa and Jigawa
States.<br></p><p>
Sesame has been reported to be a typical crop for farmers in the developing countries
(Bennet, 2011). This is because it has deep roots and is well adapted to withstand dry
conditions. It grows on relatively poor soils in climate generally unsuitable for other
crops, and so it is widely valued for its nutritional and financial yield. It is well suited to
small-holder farming with a relatively short harvest cycle of 90 – 140 days, allowing
other crops to be grown in the field (Chemonics, 2002; Naturland, 2002; Nigeria‟s
Harvest, 2009) and often intercropped with other grains. This makes it favourable to
Nigerian farmers. Production can thus be sustained by small-holder farmers under
minimum management with average yield of 700kg per hectare (Nigeria‟s Harvest,
2009). The three major languages in Nigeria, Hausa, Igbo and Yoruba call it Ridi, Isasa
and Ekuku respectively. </p><p>1.2 Problem Statement
Sesame seed is an important component of Nigeria‟s agricultural export (Chemonics,
2002). It currently ranks second to cocoa in terms of export volume in Nigeria and is
fast becoming prominent among non-oil exports because it is one of the few cash crops
that can earn the country foreign exchange. Attributed to its high demand, any quantity
of the product offered to the market is easily sold. Although it is quite extensively
cultivated, it is mainly a small-holder crop, often intercropped with others crops (Abu et
al. 2011). Available records showed that Nigeria exported 140,800 tonnes of sesame
seed worth $139 million in 2010. It was also recorded that Nigeria earned N210 billion
from the export of sesame seed products in the first half of 2012 (Ciuci, 2013).
This increasing demand for sesame seed provides Nigeria an opportunity to increase its
production to meet the international demand for the commodity. Market opportunities
exist in Korea, India, the Middle East and Mediterranean countries where sesame seed
oil is in very high demand (Ciuci, 2013). This therefore provides Nigeria with the
opportunity to broaden its market base. Currently only about 300,000 hectares of the
estimated 3.5 million hectares of Nigeria‟s 90 million hectares of arable land that is
suitable for cultivating sesame seed is presently being used in the production of sesame
seed (Tunde-Akintunde et al. 2012). By investing more in sesame seed production, the
Nigerian government could increase annual revenue from sesame seed export from N21
billion to about N86 billion annually (Ciuci, 2013).
<br></p><p>
The realization of the potential of sesame production in the acquisition of foreign
currency for the country made increased production of the crop a prominent priority in
the Agricultural Transformation Agenda of the Federal Government of Nigeria. To this
end, farmers are being encouraged to produce sesame in all agro-ecological zones of the
country. Nigeria has the technology to produce significant output of sesame for export
in view of the yield potentials of the varieties released to farmers (NCRI, 2012).
However, some studies on sesame indicated a wide gap between potential and actual
yields obtained (RMRDC, 2004, Olowe, 2007; NAERLS, 2010; Kanton et al., 2013).
The NAERLS (2010) reported actual sesame yield of 300kg/ha against potential yield
of between 700-1,000 kg/ha which is below the world average yield of 4,900kg/ha and
four times lower than the average yield of other oil seed crops like groundnut and
soybean. Manyong et al. (2005) reaffirmed actual sesame yield of 0.55 tonnes/ha
against a potential yield of 2 tonnes/ha with a yield gap of 264% for North-Central
Nigeria. </p><p>Nigeria‟s inability to fully tap into the economic potentials of the crop might be
a reflection of its inefficient nature in sesame production.
One of the major factors responsible for low agricultural productivity in Nigeria is
farmers‟ limited access to production inputs which are necessary for attaining a high
level of production (Nwaru, 2004). Amaza and Olayemi (2002) observed that crop
farmers mostly carry out their production under conditions involving the use of
inefficient tools and unimproved seed varieties and therefore, maximum efficiency is
elusive to them. Productivity according to Coelli et al. (1998) is a measure of farm
performance which indicates whether a farm uses the best available technology to
obtain maximum output from a given set of inputs. On the other hand, technical
efficiency is the ratio of total output to total inputs; the larger the amount of inputs per
unit of output, the smaller the size this ratio becomes (Ohajianya and Onyenweaku,
2001).
<br></p><p>
Sesame is extensively cultivated in Benue State but there is little information on the
productivity as well as the efficiency of resources used and profitability. One way
farmers can raise productivity is improving the efficiency within the limit of the existing
resource base and technology (Udoh, 2005). Productivity is reduced in the presence of
technical inefficiency whereas the more efficient the firm, the higher its productivity,
ceteris paribus (Kumbhakar, 2004). Boosting sesame production would require that
farm resources be use efficiently since efficiency in the use of the production inputs is
essential for optimum production. Therefore, there is the need to assess the level of
efficiency of resources used in agricultural production in general and sesame production
in particular. This therefore, necessitates answers to the following research questions:
<br></p><p>
i. What are the socio-economic characteristics of sesame producers?</p><p> ii. Is sesame production profitable? </p><p>iii. Are the resources efficiently utilized? </p><p>iv. What are the constraints associated with sesame production in Benue State? </p><p><b>1.3 Objectives of the Study </b></p><p>The broad objective of the study was to examine the economic efficiencies of sesame
production in Benue State.The specific objectives were to:
i. describe the socio-economics characteristics of farmers in the study area;
ii. determine the cost and returns in sesame production;
iii. estimate the economic efficiency in sesame production; and
iv. describe the constraints associated with sesame production in the study area.
<br></p>